https://gdprhub.eu/api.php?userExpLevel=unregistered&hidebots=1&urlversion=1&days=7&limit=50&target=Article_42_GDPR&action=feedrecentchanges&feedformat=atomGDPRhub - Changes related to "Article 42 GDPR" [en]2024-03-29T13:57:29ZRelated changesMediaWiki 1.39.6https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_57_GDPR&diff=40641&oldid=38865Article 57 GDPR2024-03-28T15:58:38Z<p></p>
<a href="https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_57_GDPR&diff=40641&oldid=38865">Show changes</a>Nghttps://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=Article_5_GDPR&diff=40605&oldid=40378Article 5 GDPR2024-03-27T14:57:33Z<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">(c) Data minimisation</span></span></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 14:57, 27 March 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l296">Line 296:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 296:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><u>Case Law:</u> In [<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[C-708</del>/<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">18 - TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA|</del>C-708/18 - ''TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA''<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">]</del>] the CJEU had to provide guidance on how to assess whether processing (in that case, a video surveillance system) could be considered "''necessary''" for the purpose of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller. The Court held that the necessity of a processing operation must be examined in conjunction with the data minimisation principle which restricts the controller's options to those "''adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purposes for which they are collected''". In conclusion, the Court clarified that the controller must, amongst other things, examine "''whether it is sufficient that the video surveillance operates only at night or outside normal working hours, and block or obscure the images taken in areas where surveillance is unnecessary''".<ref>CJEU, Case C-708/18, ''TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA'', 11 December 2019 (rectified 13 February 2020), margin number 51 (available [https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=4A9F71BCDFB6F507CC5D0302FA1AE329?text=&docid=221465&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=35786932 here]).</ref></blockquote></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><u>Case Law:</u> In [<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document</ins>/<ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">document.jsf;jsessionid=29A1F14E051DDCFB0F51D3C4070F4564?text=&docid=221465&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=6835843 </ins>C-708/18 - ''TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA''] the CJEU had to provide guidance on how to assess whether processing (in that case, a video surveillance system) could be considered "''necessary''" for the purpose of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller. The Court held that the necessity of a processing operation must be examined in conjunction with the data minimisation principle which restricts the controller's options to those "''adequate, relevant and not excessive in relation to the purposes for which they are collected''". In conclusion, the Court clarified that the controller must, amongst other things, examine "''whether it is sufficient that the video surveillance operates only at night or outside normal working hours, and block or obscure the images taken in areas where surveillance is unnecessary''".<ref>CJEU, Case C-708/18, ''TK v Asociaţia de Proprietari bloc M5A-ScaraA'', 11 December 2019 (rectified 13 February 2020), margin number 51 (available [https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf;jsessionid=4A9F71BCDFB6F507CC5D0302FA1AE329?text=&docid=221465&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=35786932 here]).</ref></blockquote></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The principle of data minimisation does however not mean that any processing of large data quantities is always illegal. If the use of larger quantities of personal data is the only way to achieve a purpose, a controller may use any 'necessary' data.<ref>''Herbst'', in Kühling/Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 5 GDPR, margin number 56 (C.H. Beck 2020)</ref> </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The principle of data minimisation does however not mean that any processing of large data quantities is always illegal. If the use of larger quantities of personal data is the only way to achieve a purpose, a controller may use any 'necessary' data.<ref>''Herbst'', in Kühling/Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, Article 5 GDPR, margin number 56 (C.H. Beck 2020)</ref> </div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key gdprwiki:diff::1.12:old-40378:rev-40605 -->
</table>Im