BfDI (Germany) - 17.02.2021: Difference between revisions
(Replaced content with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Germany |DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff; |DPAlogo=LogoDE.jpg |DPA_Abbrevation=BfDI |DPA_With_Country=BfDI (Germany) |Case_Number_Na...") Tags: Replaced Visual edit |
m (Ar moved page BfDI (Germany) - KiKxxl GmbH to BfDI (Germany) - 17.02.2021) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
|Party_Link_5= | |Party_Link_5= | ||
|Appeal_To_Body= | |Appeal_To_Body=AG Bonn (Germany) | ||
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name= | |Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name= | ||
|Appeal_To_Status=Pending appeal | |Appeal_To_Status=Pending appeal | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The Federal Network Agency fined the call center KiKxxl GmbH for telephone advertising without permission. | The German Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) fined the call center KiKxxl GmbH €260,000 for violating Article 6 GDPR by telephone advertising without permission. | ||
==English Summary== | ==English Summary== | ||
Latest revision as of 16:41, 12 December 2023
| BfDI - KiKxxl GmbH | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | BfDI (Germany) |
| Jurisdiction: | Germany |
| Relevant Law: | Article 6 GDPR Article 21 GDPR Article 16 Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications § 102 (2) TKG § 149 (1) Nr. 17 (e) TKG § 20 UWG § 7 UWG |
| Type: | Complaint |
| Outcome: | Upheld |
| Started: | |
| Decided: | |
| Published: | 17.02.2021 |
| Fine: | 260000 EUR |
| Parties: | n/a |
| National Case Number/Name: | KiKxxl GmbH |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | Pending appeal AG Bonn (Germany) |
| Original Language(s): | German |
| Original Source: | bundesnetzagentur.de (in DE) |
| Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The German Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) fined the call center KiKxxl GmbH €260,000 for violating Article 6 GDPR by telephone advertising without permission.
English Summary
Facts
The KiKxxl GmbH called consumers to make telephone advertising for different other companies without having any effective consent of the consumers. The company just checked the consents in an insufficient way or in some cases also not at all. They also kept making that calls although the consumers complained about the calls.
Dispute
Holding
The President of the Federal Network Agency Jochen Homann held that call centers also have to obey the law just like their employers.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.
