HDPA (Greece) - 1/2023

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 15:58, 17 February 2023 by Anastasia.tsermenidou (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Greece |DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff; |DPAlogo=LogoGR.jpg |DPA_Abbrevation=HDPA |DPA_With_Country=HDPA (Greece) |Case_Number_Name=1/2...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
HDPA - 1/2023
LogoGR.jpg
Authority: HDPA (Greece)
Jurisdiction: Greece
Relevant Law: Article 17 GDPR
Article 21(1) GDPR
Article 21(2) GDPR
Article 51 GDPR
Article 55 GDPR
Article 56(2) GDPR
Type: Complaint
Outcome: Other Outcome
Started: 09.01.2033
Decided: 11.01.2023
Published: 12.02.2023
Fine: n/a
Parties: n/a
National Case Number/Name: 1/2023
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: n/a
Original Language(s): Greek
Original Source: HDPA (in EL)
Initial Contributor: Anastasia Tsermenidou

The Division of the DPA refers the case in its entirety, which concerned the right to be forgotten on the grounds of a particular importance and general significance to the plenary of the DPA.

English Summary

Facts

The complainant submitted a request for deletion on "removals@google.com" of Google, since his personal data were related to his status, affect his personal and professional reputation, violate his right to respect his personal and professional privacy. To this request Google replied she has decided not to cut this content, after having balanced the relevant rights and interest related to the content including the relevance to the complainant's professional life. Google cannot assess the request in question on the basis of defamation and offences against honour and reputation in general, and that any false, inaccurate or defamatory nature of the contested information relied on by the complainant does not, according to the Costeja judgment, establish the existence of the right to erasure of search results, noting that defamation relates to a person's reputation, whereas the right to be forgotten relates to privacy. The complainant raised that is his case a judgment of the CJEU in Google Spain is applied, since his association, as a natural person, with certain publications constitutes processing of personal data within the meaning of the GDPR, which is fully applicable. The Division of the DPA refers the case at hand in its entirety because of the particular importance and general significance to the plenary of the DPA.

Holding

The Division of the DPA refers the case at hand in its entirety because of the particular importance and general significance to the plenary of the DPA.

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the Greek original. Please refer to the Greek original for more details.

We use cookies that are necessary to maintain your connection to the online services of the Authority's Internet Portal (PO) and to store your choices in relation to optional cookies ("Necessary").
Only with your consent will we use any of the following optional cookies you choose ("Analysis", "LinkedIn", "Twitter"). You can see information about each category of cookies by hovering over each option.