BVwG - W211 2227144-1

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 10:01, 9 February 2021 by MB (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Austria |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=BVwG |Court_With_Country=BVwG (Austria) |Case_Number_Name=W211 22271...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
BVwG - W211 2227144-1
Courts logo1.png
Court: BVwG (Austria)
Jurisdiction: Austria
Relevant Law: Article 2 GDPR
Article 51 GDPR
Article 55(3) GDPR
Article 77 GDPR
Article 133(4) Federal Constitution of Austria (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz)
Article 94 Federal Constitution of Austria (Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz)
§ 1 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
§ 18 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
§ 31 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
§ 35 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
§ 4 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz - DSG)
Decided: 23.11.2020
Published: 01.02.2021
Parties: unnkown police investigator (data subject and complainant before the DSB)
Austrian Parliament / parliamentary committee of inquiry (controller and respondent before the DSB)
National Case Number/Name: W211 2227144-1
European Case Law Identifier: ECLI:AT:BVWG:2020:W211.2227144.1.00
Appeal from:
Appeal to: Unknown
Original Language(s): German
Original Source: Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (RIS) (in German)
Initial Contributor: Marco Blocher

The Austrian Federal Administrative Court held that the Austrian DPA is competent to handle complaints of a data subject regarding the allegedly unlawful the disclorure of his data by a parliamentary committee of inquiry.

English Summary


Lorem ipsum


Lorem ipsum


Lorem ipsum


Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.