CJEU - C-319/20 - Facebook Ireland Limited v Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 09:32, 11 October 2021 by FA (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
CJEU - C-319/20 Facebook Ireland Limited v Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.
Cjeulogo.png
Court: CJEU
Jurisdiction: European Union
Relevant Law: Article 80(1) GDPR
Article 80(2) GDPR
Article 84(1) GDPR
Decided:
Parties: Facebook Ireland Limited
Bundesverband der Verbraucherzentralen und Verbraucherverbände — Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.
Case Number/Name: C-319/20 Facebook Ireland Limited v Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V.
European Case Law Identifier:
Reference from: BGH (Germany)
Language: 24 EU Languages
Original Source: Judgement
Initial Contributor: n/a

See Holding for the question referred.

English Summary[edit | edit source]

Facts[edit | edit source]

Facts pending decision.

Holding[edit | edit source]

Question referred:

Do the rules in Chapter VIII, in particular in Article 80(1) and (2) and Article 84(1), of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 preclude national rules which — alongside the powers of intervention of the supervisory authorities responsible for monitoring and enforcing the Regulation and the options for legal redress for data subjects — empower, on the one hand, competitors and, on the other, associations, entities and chambers entitled under national law, to bring proceedings for breaches of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, independently of the infringement of specific rights of individual data subjects and without being mandated to do so by a data subject, against the infringer before the civil courts on the basis of the prohibition of unfair commercial practices or breach of a consumer protection law or the prohibition of the use of invalid general terms and conditions?

Comment[edit | edit source]

Share your comments here!

Further Resources[edit | edit source]

Share blogs or news articles here!