CJEU - C-61/22 - Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden

From GDPRhub
Revision as of 09:49, 27 April 2022 by Kc (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{CJEUdecisionBOX |Case_Number_Name=C-61/22 Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden |ECLI= |Opinion_Link= |Judgement_Link=https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?text=&docid=257102&pag...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
CJEU - C-61/22 Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden
Cjeulogo.png
Court: CJEU
Jurisdiction: European Union
Relevant Law: Article 35(10) GDPR
Article 3(5) Regulation (EU) 2019/1157
Article 7 CFR
Article 77(3) TFEU
Article 8 CFR
§ 5 Personalausweisgesetz
§ 9 Personalausweisgesetz
Decided:
Parties:
Case Number/Name: C-61/22 Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden
European Case Law Identifier:
Reference from: VG Wiesbaden (Germany)
Language: 24 EU Languages
Original Source: Judgement
Initial Contributor: n/a

See Holding for questions referred.

English Summary

Facts

Facts pending decision.

Holding

Question referred:

Does the obligation to take fingerprints and store them in identity cards in accordance with Article 3(5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1157 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on strengthening the security of identity cards of Union citizens and of residence documents issued to Union citizens and their family members exercising their right of free movement (OJ 2019 L 188, p. 67) infringe higher-ranking EU law, in particular

(a) Article 77(3) TFEU (b) Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter (c) Article 35(10) of the GDPR and is it therefore invalid on one of those grounds?

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!