CJEU - T‑553/23, - Latombe v Commission: Revision history

9 July 2026

• curprev 14:3214:32, 9 July 2026 Ds talk contribs m 10,152 bytes +7 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:3214:32, 9 July 2026 Ds talk contribs m 10,145 bytes +7 EU LAW CLEAN-UP Tag: Visual edit

10 September 2025

• curprev 14:0114:01, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,138 bytes −5 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 10:1310:13, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,143 bytes −472 →Established by law Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 08:2708:27, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,615 bytes +133 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 08:2508:25, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,482 bytes +280 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 08:1108:11, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,202 bytes +31 →Holding: major change to title: clarified the tempus regit actum approach of the Court. Seems fair to me given that the Court itself explains this explicitly Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 08:0308:03, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 10,171 bytes +48 →The Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:5907:59, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,123 bytes +1 →The Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework: better clarified the scope of both DPF and Privacy Shield Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:5607:56, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,122 bytes +21 →The Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 07:5507:55, 10 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 10,101 bytes +151 →Latombe's annulment action: clarified: old adequacy decision only covered Privacy Shield certified data importers Tag: Visual edit

9 September 2025

• curprev 15:2315:23, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,950 bytes −9 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:2315:23, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,959 bytes +218 clarified: DPF only covers certified organizations Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:2015:20, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 9,741 bytes −8 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:1815:18, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,749 bytes −6 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:1815:18, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,755 bytes +261 →On Article 32 GDPR Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:1715:17, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 9,494 bytes −1 →On Article 22 GDPR Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:1715:17, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 9,495 bytes +17 →On bulk data collection Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:1615:16, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,478 bytes −112 →On 4 CFREU Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:1215:12, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,590 bytes +140 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 15:0115:01, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,450 bytes +242 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:5214:52, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 9,208 bytes −55 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:5014:50, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,263 bytes +295 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:5014:50, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 8,968 bytes −51 →Facts Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• curprev 14:4914:49, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 9,019 bytes +4 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
• curprev 14:4814:48, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs m 9,015 bytes −16 →Facts Tag: Visual edit: Switched
• curprev 14:4714:47, 9 September 2025 Cci talk contribs 9,031 bytes +9,031 Created page with "{{CJEUdecisionBOX |Case_Number_Name=T‑553/23, Latombe v Commission |ECLI=ECLI:EU:T:2025:831 |Opinion_Link= |Judgement_Link=https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62023TJ0553 |Date_Decided=03.09.2025 |Year=2025 |GDPR_Article_1=Article 22 GDPR |GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 22 GDPR |GDPR_Article_2=Article 32 GDPR |GDPR_Article_Link_2=Article 32 GDPR |GDPR_Article_3=Article 45(2) GDPR |GDPR_Article_Link_3=Article 45 GDPR#2 |GDPR_Article_4=Article 47 G..." Tag: submission [1.0]