CNPD (Portugal) - Deliberação 2021/533: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
(Translation reviewed and adapted.)
Line 75: Line 75:


<pre>
<pre>
                                                                                                  AVG12021I01 1
CNPD
National Commission for Data Protection
DELIBERATION/2021 / 533
1. introduction
1.
The National Commission for Data Protection (CNPD) has received more than a dozen participations regarding the ongoing census operation - Census 2021 - carried out by the National Statistics Institute, I.P. (INE), which in part is done by filling out the form available online at https://censos2021.ine.pt/. The greatest number of participations is related to the fact that the survey requires citizens to provide their identification data, namely their full name. However, some respondents associated the requirement to provide identifying data with the transfer of data to a company based in the United States of America.


2.
2. The same question was also asked on social networks, and media outlets reported that the information displayed there was inaccurate.


    rJ
3.
3. The ACNPD, under the powers conferred by Article 58(1)(b) and (e) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), in conjunction with Article 3, Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)(b), all of which are applicable to the processing of personal data, is responsible for the protection of personal data. 1 of article 6, all of Law 58/2019, of 8August (which aims to ensure the implementation, in the internal legal order, of the GDPR), has analyzed the website of Statistics Portugal and the platform made available therein, and concluded that this entity uses services provided by the company Cloudflare. Statistics Portugal was also requested to provide information on this operation regarding personal data.


li.
Analysis


CNPD
i.
  Nacronãl Commission
Facts found
  of PYotData


                                            DELTBERAÇÃO / 2021t533
4.
The Census 2021 data collection form is accessed through the infrastructure provided by Cloudflare, lnc. (hereinafter Cloudflare), a company based in San Francisco, California, in the United States of America. This company provides various Internet security and Content Delivery Network (CDN) services.


5.
The CDN consists of a network of servers that aims to reduce the latency of access to servers -i.e., the period of time between the user's action and the response to that action. In effect, through an algorithm that sends information simultaneously to several servers, it chooses the one with the shortest response time. With this, it is possible to deliver information faster and with greater robustness from the point of view of security.


6.
ACloudflare owns 200 {hundred} datacenters located in over one hundred countries, the vast majority of which do not have an adequate level of data protection, under the terms of article 45.0 of the RGPD.


        l. lntroduction
7.
OINE used the services provided by the company Cloudflare through the onlined subscription to its Business Plan1. This plan provides a set of services, and INE is currently making use of WAF2, the CDN, and Rate Limit3.  


8. This plan is governed by the 'Self-Serve Subscription Agreement'4 (main service provision agreement) and the data processing addendum (Data Processing Addendum version 3.05), dated October 1st, 2020, which is part of the main agreement (see clause 6.1 of the main agreement).


    i. The National Data Protection Commission (CNPD) received more than a dozen related participations
9. INE justified the conclusion of this contract with the objective of "(...) effectively responding to the performance and information security needs associated with the size and complexity of the Census 2021 operation".


    to the ongoing census operation - 2021 Censuses - carried out by the National Statistics Institute, l.P.NE), the
10. Notwithstanding the use of this service, it is not, nor has it ever been, in question that the information provided by citizens through the Censos 2021 forms is hosted in INE's servers.  


    which partly takes place by filling in the online form available at the address
11 . When the citizen accesses the Census 2021 form, it is forwarded to one of Cloudflare's servers according to the referred algorithm. Cloudflare's infrastructure communicates with the INE server by TLS.


    httos.//censos2021.ine.pt/ The largest share is linked to the survey's obligation to provide
12. The name censos2021.ine.pt is associated with IP 172.67.41.182, located in the United States of America, and is assigned to Cloudflare. Customers access the site using the HTTPS secure communication protocol, and the associated certificate is issued by Cloudflare, Inc ECC CA-3, a certification body of Cloudflare itself. Thus, this company holds both the private key and the plastic key,
1 This plan is presented on Cloudflare's website as being aimed at small businesses and e-commerce websites that require advanced performance and security, and that give priority to email support. See httos://www.cloudflare.com/olans/business/ 2A WAF helps secure web applications by filtering and monitoring HTTP traffic. It protects against attacks such as Cross Site Request Forgery,
Cross Site Scripting, SQLlnjection, and others. 3 Rate limiting protects against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, brute force attacks and other types of malicious behavior. 4 httos://www cloudflare.com/terms/
httos://www.cloudflare.com/resources/assets/slt31c6tev37/1 M 1 j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971 b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer OPA v,3 1 -en J Oct 2020.pdf


    identification data of all the full name. However, some participations
13.
                                citizens,
Note that the fact that the encryption key used is Cloudflare's means that the encryption is applied by this entity, remaining during the transit of information, and is deciphered by it, and only by it - i.e., before delivering the whole set of information (the data packages) to INE, Cloudflare has to proceed to its deciphering, and INE has no intervention in this process.


    associated the data provision obiigator identified with the transfer of data to a
14.
Moreover, INE admits that it has no control over the transmission of information between citizens and its server. Once inside Cloudflare's CON network, Statistics Portugal has no way of knowing whether the traffic is being directed to servers located in the territory of European Union countries or residing in any other area of the world.


    company based in the United States of America.
15.
As of the date of this deliberation, personal data of more than six million citizens residing in the national territory has been collected.  




    2. Also on social networks, the same issue was raised, with media outlets reporting
ii. Assessment in light of the RGPD
16 Since the information provided by citizens when filling out the Census 2021 forms constitutes personal data, under the terms of article 4.0, paragraph 1), of the RGPO - since it corresponds to information on identified natural persons -, the census operation is subject to the RGPO, and Statistics Portugal is responsible for the processing, in accordance with paragraphs 2) and 7) of the same article.


    that the information exposed there was not accurate.
17. It is also true that some of the information falls into the category of specific personal data provided for in Article 9(1) of the RGPO, and therefore the data processing is subject to a stricter protection regime and to the obligation to carry out a data protection impact assessment (DPA), in accordance with Article 9(1) and (3)(b) of the RGPO.  


18.
It should be noted that the AIPO must cover all operations on personal data, including, therefore, the operation corresponding to the transport of information to and from Cloudflare's servers, in the scope of the outsourcing relationship. 


    3. CNPD, under the powers conferred by subparagraphs b) and Article 58.0 (1) of Regulation (EU)
19. On this point, INE declared to the CNPO that "(...) it has chosen to carry out a Data Protection Impact Assessment only for the main statistical operation. This was due to the fact that the tests (2016, 2018, 2020) only aimed at testing collection processes and application functionalities, and were, as far as the application solutions were concerned, partial. Therefore, they did not allow for testing and evaluating the risk inherent in all processes. In this sense, only the final operation allowed for a complete and comprehensive assessment
)
in a scenario where the decisions taken, given the pandemic context, were being modified and optimized. However, the respective contents are not yet integrated in such a way as to be made immediately available. Although the systematic and continuous monitoring of the EPD and RSI to the Census 2021 is guaranteed."


    20161679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 6 (General Regulation on the Protection
20.
20. As an impact assessment was not carried out for this specific operation on personal data, Statistics Portugal did not carry out an assessment of the risks for the rights of data subjects and, consequently, did not adopt any additional measures to mitigate these risks, focusing only on the performance and security of the system, including consulting the National Security Office.


    Data - RGPD), in conjunction with the provisions of article 3.0, paragraph 2 of article 4.0 and paragraph b) owner 1
21.
21. Statistics Portugal did not consult the CNPD on this operation, which would have allowed the CNPD to make a statement and thus seek to protect the rights of the data subjects.  


    of article6.0, all from Lein.0 58/2019, from August 1 (which has the object of insuring the execution, in
22.
However, even considering the purpose of this operation, there were other solutions that could have mitigated the risks, ensuring greater control over the data by Statistics Portugal, and, of course, limiting the transit of personal data to the territory of EU Member States, which would not imply sending them to third countries.


                                                                                  platform
23.
    internal law, of the GDPR), proceeded to the analysis of the INE internet site and the one made available there,
However, the choice of the NSI implies, as will be shown, the transit of personal data through third countries in relation to the European Union and which do not have the adequate level of protection. It also implies, by virtue of the contract signed, a specific authorization by INE to transfer personal data to the United States of America (USA) and to other countries where the servers used by Cloudflare are located (namely, South Africa, China, India, Jordan, Mexico, Russia, Singapore).


    having concluded that this entity uses services provided by the company Cloudflare.
24.
As described above, in points 5 and 11, the personal data of citizens residing in Portugal are sent to Cloudflare servers located in different countries that are neither identified nor identifiable by INE or by the data subjects. Moreover, the encryption and decryption key is owned by Cloudflare.  


      information to iNE regarding this operation on personal data.


25. The contract concluded between Statistics Portugal and Cloudflare foresees the transit of personal data to any of the 200 servers used by Cloudflare, as well as the transfer of personal data to the USA.


26. Indeed, under the terms of the Data Processing Addendum version 3.0 (hereinafter 'OPA'), which, it is recalled, forms part of
contract, personal data are transferred from the customer (data exporter) to Cloudflare (data importer), in the United States of America, using as international transfer mechanism the standard contractual clauses based on Commission Decision 2010/87/EU of 5 February 2010, applicable transfers of personal data to processors established in third countries6 , which are an integral part of the Addendum and are to that extent endorsed by the customer (cf. clause 1.1(m) of the DPA)7.


        ll. Analyze
27.
The PPA applies to the extent that Cloudflare processes personal data submitted by the customer to Cloudflare or, as is the case with INE, collected and processed by the customer using the service, where such personal data is subject to applicable data protection legislation.  


28.
Thus, by (sub)contracting Cloudflare's services, INE, in its capacity of controller and simultaneously of client, accepted the conditions of use of the service, including the amendment to the terms of processing of personal data, which contains a contract between the controller (INE) and the subcontractor (Cloudflare) for the transfer of personal data to the United States of America.


          i. Determined facts
29.
Also under the terms of the Tender Offer, INEgranted a general authorization to Cloudflare to use other (sub-)subcontractors, whether companies within or outside the Group (clause 4.2), acknowledging and accepting that it may be necessary for the provision of the service to use (sub-)subcontractors established in third countries (clause 6.4).  


      4.0 form for collecting data from the 2021 Census is accessed through the available infrastructure
30.  
If standard contractual clauses are, in general, a legal instrument for the transfer of personal data to third countries, under the combined provisions of Article 46.0(2)(e) en. 0 5 of the GDPR, it is necessary to verify, however, whether the law of the third country, which obviously overlaps with an instrument of a contractual nature, does not diminish or negate the guarantees offered by these clauses, which aim precisely at compensating for the lack of an adequate level of protection in the country of destination of the data (cf.


      by (hereinafter, a company based in San Francisco, California, the United States
31 . According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), it is for the data exporter, on a case-by-case basis, in cooperation with the data importer, to ascertain whether the country of destination in question ensures a level of data protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed by the EU and, if possible, to adopt additional safeguards to overcome the obstacles and ensure that data protection is maintained9. This obligation also derives from compliance with the principle of accountability, enshrined in
          Cloudflare, lnc. Cloudflare),
Article 5.0.2 of the GDPR.
6 Conformeconstains from Cloudflare's website. the privacy policy was revised on October 27, 2020, to "reflect- a change in the legal instrument underpinning the transfer of personal data from the European Union (EU) to the United States of America (US), which is no longer the Privacy Sh,eld adequacy decision invalidated by the Court of Justice of the European Union (T JEU) in July 2020. in the Schrems li case, to become the standard contractual clauses 7 httos://www.cloudflare.com/cloudflare customer sccs.pdf 8 See nrs. 92 and 93 of the Schrems li Judgment, in which the Court stressed that the assessment of the existence of a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed in the EU in the country of destination of the data must be made regardless of whether a transfer mechanism provided for in Chapter V of the GDPR is used. 9 See paragraph 134 of the Schrems II judgment.


      United States of America. This company provides several security services on the Internet and Content Delivery
32.
According to the CJEU analysis in the Schrems li case, the law of the US -which is the destination country for Cloudflare's international transfers under the standard contractual clauses- allows for interference with the fundamental rights of individuals based on national security and public interest requirements, which may result in access to personal data transferred from the EU to the US and the use of such data in surveillance programs, based on Section 702 of the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) and Executive Order 123331.


      Network (CDN).
33.
The TJEU concluded that such interference is not proportionate under EU law as there is no definition of the scope of the limitations on individuals' rights, no clear and precise rules on the application of such measures and no minimum requirements to protect against risks of abuse, no assessment of necessity, no enforceable rights for data subjects and no judicial remedies, so that the limitations on data protection under US law do not meet the requirements of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights11 (cf. Articles 7, 8, 47 and 52(1)). 1).  


34.
Therefore, a transfer of personal data to the U.S. would be possible if the legislation at stake here, and expressly referred to by the CJEU, were not directly or indirectly applicable to Cloudflare or its (sub-)subcontractors, and even then only by taking additional measures that could demonstrably show that this legislation would not be applicable or would have no practical effect on transfers of personal data.


      5. The CDN consists of a network of servers that aims to reduce the latency of access to the
35.  
However, the services provided by Cloudflare, namely those contracted by INE when it subscribed to the Business Plan, put the company directly under US law, which imposes on it the obligation to grant bulk access to the personal data it processes, already as a provider of electronic communications services12 , without prejudice to other types of services also being covered by other provisions of the US surveillance legislation.


      servers- 1.e., the period of time between the user's action and the response to that action. With
36.
Cloudflare acknowledges in point 7 of the Tender Offer that, in its role as a subcontractor, it may be subject to requests for access to personal data by third parties in the context of legal proceedings, which may be "inconsistent" with the law applicable to its customer, i.e., the GDPR. In such a case, where a conflict of laws exists, Cloudflare declares that it will immediately inform the Customer, "unless such notification is legally prohibited" (cf. a) clause 7.1 ).  


      effect, through an algorithm that sends information simultaneously to several servers, chooses that one


      which requires a shorter response time. with islo, faster information delivery is achieved
10 See paragraph 165 of the cited judgment, where the PRISM andUPSTREAM programs are cited. 11 See paragraphs 175-176, 180-185, 191 and 94 of the cited judgment. 12 Cf. Section 702 of FISA as amended by 50 use§ 188P.


      and with greater robustness from the point of view of security.
37.
This is precisely the case with this US legislation that prevents US companies from informing their customers of access by US authorities for the purpose of gathering information on foreigners in the context of national security activity.  


38.
Therefore, there is no guarantee that the personal data of citizens residing in Portugal, collected by INE through its website, in the context of Censos 2021, will not be accessed by the US authorities, through Cloudflare, due to the services it provides to INE and which imply, according to the contract signed, the transfer of such personal data to the USA.


39.
In this sense, as the standard contractual clauses under which personal data are transferred by the NSI to Cloudflare in the USA cannot be respected in the third country of destination, insofar as they are not binding on the authorities of that country, thus not offering the appropriate guarantees required by the GDPR, the CNPD is obliged to prohibit these data transfers, as prescribed by the CJEU.13


40.
Furthermore, according to the same case law 14, even if the NSI could demonstrate that the personal data was not transferred to the U.S., the transit of the data would always depend on the adoption of adequate and sufficient additional measures, which are not present here.


                                                                                (+351) 400 gerâl@cnpd.pt
                                                    Av. D.íosl, 134, 1o Í 213 928
                                                        '1200-6Lisboa F (+351) 213976 832 www.cnpd.pt AVGt2021t401 1v


41 . Under Article 5(2) and Article 24 of the GDPR, Statistics Portugal is obliged to comply with the principles and rules on personal data protection and to demonstrate compliance with the processing of personal data under its responsibility.


III. Conclusion
42.
In view of the above and as there is no other corrective measure capable of safeguarding the rights of data subjects, the CNPD, under paragraph}) of Article 58(2) of the GDPR, hereby orders Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P., to suspend the sending of personal data from Censos 2021 to the USA and to other third countries without an adequate level of protection, whether through Cloudflare, lnc. or another company, within a maximum period of 12 hours.


43.
The same entity shall also ensure, in the scope of any subcontracting, that subcontractors are not obliged to comply with a legislation that departs from the protection conferred by the RGPD.


44.
The hearing is waived, in accordance with Article 124.1 a) of the Administrative Procedure Code, considering the urgency of the corrective measure, taking into account the time period of the online collection of the Census and that, otherwise, the risk to the rights, freedoms and guarantees of citizens, potentially more than four million, who have not yet fulfilled their legal obligation to respond to the census operation, would remain.




13 See paras. 107 and 121 of the cited judgment. 14 Cf. nos. 63 and 183 of the same accd.
Approved at the meeting of April 27, 2021


<
Filipa Galvão (Chair)


  6. Cloudflared has 200 (two hundred) data centers located in more than 100 countries, the vast majority of
  which does not have an adequate level of data protection, as provided for in article 4 of the RGpD.
  7.0 INE used services provided by the company Cloudflare through the online subscription of its Busmess
  P / an '. This plan provides a set of services, with INE currently making use of WAF2, the
  CDN, and Rate lrnrit3.
  B. This plan is governed by 'self-servesubscription
                                                            Agreement'a (main contract for the provision of
  services) and the data processing addendum (Data Processing Addendum version 3.0s), dated
  1 October 2020, which is part of the main contract (cf. clause 6.1 of the main contract).
  9.0 INE justified the execution of this contract with the objective of '(..) responding effectively to
  performance and information security needs associated with dimension and complexity
                                                                                                of the operation
  2021 Census ".
  I0. Notwithstanding the use of these services, it is not, nor ever
                                                                  was concerned that the information provided
  by citizens through
                        of the 2021 censuses' Imormulários is housed in the lNE's seitores.
  11. the citizen
      When you access the 2021 Census form, you are forwarded to one of the
  Cloudflare according to this algorithm. Even though the criterion underlying this algorithm is the highest
  proximity of the servers to the location of the origin of the invocation, there is no guarantee that
                                                                                          of such a success,
  since it depends on the load on them at each moment.
                                                                    Cloudflare infrastructure communicates
  with the DOINE server via TLS.
  12 name
      Censos2021 .ine.pt is associated with lP 172.67.41.182, located in the United States of America,
  being assigned to CloudÍlare.0s clients access the site using the secure communication protocol
  HTTPS, the associated certificate being issued by Cloudflare, tnECC CA-3, an entity
                                                                                                certifying
  Cloudflare itself.
                              Therefore, this company holds both the private and public keys,
rSplit is presented on the Cloudflar website as a small business website
performance and security that is comercielelronic, eÍequeÍem
                                  advanced, and give priority to .orr ... ãta, óni.o support. veí
2ttps: //www.cloudÍlare.com/plans/business/
A WAF helps protect waofiltremonitor applications from HTT traffic. Píotedos attack as cross regre Reguest Forgery,
Cross S, te Scí, pSoL /r.iectior, among others.
3 protects
Ráte, r? Itlng against Oeofservice (DoS) attacks - brute force attacks and malignant types.
Ihttps: //wwwcloudlare.com/terms/
5
              f1
        - 'l P 44
DPA v.3 1 in oct 2020odf AVçt2021t401 2
    rJ
CNPD
  National Commission
  deProtedeData
    getting enabled that
            so the cyber and decryption of all communications between citizens access
    to the form and send data to the lNE server.
    13. Note that the fact that the encryption key used is from Cloudflare means the encryption is applied by
    this entity, maintaining itself during the transit of the information, and is by it, and only by it, deciphered - that is,
    before the delivery of all the information (the data packets) to lNE, aCloudflare must proceed with its
                                any intervention in this process.
    decryption, not having INE
    14. Incidentally, INE does not provide information between citizens and their service.
              o admits control over transmission
    Once inside Cloudflare's CDN network, OINE has no way of knowing if the traffic is directed to
    servers located in the countries of the European Union, or resident in any other area of the globe.
    15. As of the date of this determination, personal data has been collected from more than six million citizens
    residing in national territory.
        ii. Assessment in the light of the GDPR
    16. There is no doubt that the information provided by citizens when filling out the forms
                                    personal data, 1), of the GDPR - for
    2021 Census consist of data in the terms of article 4.0, paragraph
    information relating to identified natural persons, the census operation is subject to the GDPR, being
    INE is responsible for the treatment, in accordance with paragraphs 2) and 7) of the same article.
    17. While it is also certain that some of the information falls within the category of special personal data
    in Article 9.0 (1) of the GDPR, and data processing is therefore subject to a more stringent protection
                      therefore, to carry out an impact assessment on data protection
    rigorous and, since the obligation
    (AIPD), in accordance with paragraph 1 and paragraph b.do paragraph 3 of article 9.0 of the GDPR.
                                                                                                        therefore,
      18. It should be noted that the AIPD must cover all operations on personal data, including,
    the operation corresponding to the transport of information to and from Cloudflare servers, within the scope of
      subcontracting relationship.
      19.As for this point, INE declared to CNPD that '(..opted for the realization of an Impact Assessment
      about Data Protection only to the statistical operation. main.lsto was due to the fact that the tests
      (2016,2018,2020) ylsarem re applicational functionalities, are, as far as
                                just test harvesting processes and
      in relation to solutions to plications, partly, therefore they did not allow testing and assessment of the risk related to sludge
      the pIocesses. In this sense, only the final operation allowed to carry out a complete and comprehensive assessment
                                                                                  (+351) 213 geral@cnpd.t
                                                      Av. 0.arlol, 13410 Í 928 400
                                                          120M51 Lisboa F (1351213 976 832 www.cnpd.pt AVG / 2021/401 2 \.
in a scenario in which the Ímâ das decisions, given theandtopic context, were being
                                                                                changed and optimized.
However, the respective contents
                                  not yet integrated in order to be made available
immediate. Although systematic and continuous monitoring of EpD and RS / Censuses is guaranteed
2021. ',
20. No impact assessment has been carried out on this specific operation on data
INE did not carry out a weighting of the risks to the rights of the data subjects and,
consequently, it has not adopted, with respect to this operation, any
                                                                  supplementary mitigating measure of these
risks, having only centered
                                performance and security of the system, including promoting a
consultation with the National Security Office.
21. About this operation,
                          INE did not consult CNPD, which would have allowed CNpD to comment and so
seek to safeguard the data holders' data.
22. However, even considering the purpose envisaged with this operation, there were other solutions that
would allow to mitigate the risks, guaranteeing INE a greater control over the data, and, from the outset, limiting
                                                                                                        O
transit of personal data to the territory of the Member States of the European Union,
                                                                                not implying your shipment
country third countries.
23. Now, the INE option implies, as demonstrated,
                                                      the transit of personal data by third country without
relation to the union that
                European Union and do not have the appropriate level of protection. It also implies, by virtue of the
contract concluded, a specific authorization from INE to transfer personal data to the United States
United States of America (USA) and other countries where the servers used by
cloudflare (namely, South Africa, chinaIndia, Jordan, Mexico, Russia,
                                                                            singapore)
24. As described above, in points 5 and 11, the personal data of resident citizens portugal
                                                                                        in are
sent to Cloudflare servers in different countries
                                              in different unidentified or identifiable by
      by the
Statistics Portugal or data holders. In addition, the decryption and decryption key is the property of Cloudflare.
25 0r4, at least
        the contract concluded INE and Cloudflare foresees the transfer of personal data to anyone
of the 200 servers used, as well as the transfer of personal data to the USA.
26. With
        effective terms of Daía Processing Addendum version 3.0 (hereinafter, DpA), which, it is recalled, integrates
The contract, personal data from the customer (data exporter) is transferred to Cloudflare (importer of
data) in the United States of America, using the international transfer mechanism
standard contractual clauses based on Commission Decision 2010 / 87lUE, of 5 February
                                                                                          2010, applicable AVGt2021t401 3
    rJ
CNPD
  National Commission
  dPÍotqãdêDâdos
    transfers of personal data to subcontractors established in third countries6, which do
    part by
          as part of the addendum and are, to that extent, customer subscriptions (heading m) of clause 1.1 of the DPA) 7.
    27. DPA applies insofar as Cloudflare personal data submitted by the client to CloudÍlare
    or, as is the case of lNE, collected and treated by the customer using the service, I pass this personal data
    are subject to the applicable data protection legislation.
    28. Thus, by (sub) contracting the services of Cloudflare, olNE, in his capacity as responsible for the treatment
    and at the same time as a customer, accepted the conditions of use of the service, including the addendum to the terms of
    processing of personal data, which contains a contact between the controller (lNE) and the
                    (Cloudflare) for personals for the United States of America.
    subcontractor the data transfer the
                                                                                    general country that this
    29. Still according to the terms of the DPA, INE granted an authorization to Cloudflare
    can resort to others (sub-subcontractors, whether companies inside or outside the Group (clause 4.2),
    recognizing and accepting that it might be necessary for the provision of the service to use (sub-
    ) subcontractors established in third countries (clause 6.4).
    30, If standard contractual clauses are, in general, a legal instrument for data transfer
    personal data for third countries, under the provisions of article 46.0, paragraph 2, point c), and paragraph 5, of
    GDPR, it is necessary to verify, however, whether the legislation of the third State, which obviously overlaps with a
                                                                                            per
    instrument of a contractual nature, does not diminish or deflate the guarantees offered by these clauses,
    which precisely aim to compensate for the lack of an adequate level of protection in the country of destination
    of the data (cf. article 44.0 and 46.0 of the GDPR) 8.
                          Court of the European Union (CJEU), it is the exporter of data that competes,
    31. According to Justice
    on a case-by-case basis, with the assistance of the data importer, verify that the specific country of destination
    a level of data protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed by the EU, and should, if possible, adopt
                              to overcome obstacles and ensure that data protection is
    additional safeguards
    keep it up. This obligation also stems from the fulfillment of the principle of responsibility, enshrined in
    in Article 5.0, paragraph 2 of the GDPR.
    ôAs per conseba doebs / leda Cloudflare, pítividad alitideeviste 27 de ocio de020, paÍa (reflection of a change in the
    legem instrument that resets the transfer of personal data from the European Union (EU) to the United States to America (USA), which
    ceased to be the decree of adequacy to the PÍoteçà of the PIVIVITYPrivacSh / e / d.), validated by the Government of the Union
    European Union (CJEU) in July 2020, in the Schíems // case, to pass over the original clauses
    7
    https: //w',^/w.cioudfiare.com/clocuslomer SCCs odí
    8See 92 and 93 of the Schrems House / iem that the Court emphasized and the assessment of the existence of an essential protection
    equitable, then guaranteed in the EU in the country of destination of the data must be
              report
    qransferênciâ in the chapter of RGP0.
    See paragraph 134 of the Schr judgment //.
                                                            CâÍlosl134 1 T (+ 3s1213928 400 geral@cnpd.pt
                                                        Av. D., â / ww.cnpd.pt
                                                          120M51 Lisboa F (+ 35i213 976 832 AVG / 2021/401 3v
                                                                                                                      I
  32. According to the CJEU analysis in the Schrems case // the US legislation - which is the country of destination of
  international transfers from Cloudflare under standard contractual clauses - allows for interference
  on people's fundamental rights,
                                          based on requirements related to national security and interest
  which may result in access to personal data transferred from the EU to the USA and the use of such data
  data under surveillance programs based on Section 702 of the FtSA (Foreign tntelligence Surveillance
  Act) and Executive Decree 1233310.
  33.0 CJEU concluded that such interferences are not proportional,
                                                                    in the light of the Union's right, insofar as
  the scope of the limitations on people's rights is not defined, there are no clear and precise rules regarding
  application of these measures or minimum requirements for protection against risks of abuse, there is no
  1uzo of necessity, and opposable rights are not conferred on holders
                                                                                data or remedies
  jurisdiction, because of the limitations on protection
                                                  data resulting from US law do not satisfy
  The requirements required by the uElr Charter of Fundamental Rights (cf. articles7.0, g.0.47.0 and 52.0, paragraph 1).
  34. Therefore, it would only be possible to carry out a personal data transfer to the USA if the legislation
  here concerned, and expressly referred to by the CJEU, were it not directly or indirectly
                                                                                          applicable to Cloudflare
  or their (sub-subcontractors, even so)
                                                      only through the adoption of supplementary measures that
  could
            demonstrably proves that this legislation would not be applicable or would have no practical effect
  on personal data transferences.
  35. However, the services provided by Cloudflare, namely those contracted by INE when
  subscribed to Euslness P / an, place the company directly under the
                                                                    within the scope of US legislation that imposes
  the obligation
              granting mass access to personal data by sitratados, right from the start as a provider
  of electronic communications services r2, without prejudice to other types of services also being covered
  other provisions of US surveillance legislation.
  36. Cloudflare recognizes in point 7 of the DPA that, in its role as a subcontractor, it may
                                                                                                  be the object of
  requests for access to personal data, as part of
                                                  third parties within the scope of legal procedures, which may
  Be "inconsistent" with the application applicable to your client, that is, RGpD. In this case, if there is a conflict,
  Cloudflare declares that it will promptly inform the customer, unless such notification is strictly prohibited »
  (cf. paragraph a) clause 7.'l).
r0VeÍ n.165 of the quoted acid, in which the grams are quoted by UpSTREAtú
rrSee numbers i 75-176, 1801915,
r2 and] 94 of the judgment.
  Cf.Section702 daFISAchanged by paper50 USC s lBBt AVG / 2021/401 4
    rJ
CNPD
  National Commission
  dPÍot @ of Data
    37. It is precisely the case with this US legislation that prevents US companies from
    inform their clients of the access made by the North American authorities to Íinsde collection of
    information about foreigners, in the context of national security activity.
    38. It appears, there is no guarantee that the personal data of citizens residing in Portugal,
    collected
                    INE through its website, within the scope of Census 202.l, are not accessed by the authorities
                intermediate
    of the USA, by Cloudflare due to the services it provides to INEe that imply, as
    contract signed, the transfer of such personal data to the USA.
    39. In this sense, the standard contractual clauses, under which personal data are
    transferred by NINE to Cloudflare, in the USA, if respected in the third country of destination, insofar as
    these do not bind the authorities of that country, thus not offering the adequate guarantees required by the
    RGPD, CNPD is obliged to prohibit these data transfers, according to the prescribed by ÍJUE.r3
    40. In addition, according to the same judiciary, even though INE could demonstrate that the data
    personal data were not transferred to the USA, data transit would always depend on the adoption of measures
    that they do not verify.
                    adequate and sufficient, here
    41. Under the terms of no. 2 of article 5.0 and article 24.0 of the RGPD, it is the responsibility of INE to comply with the
    safe principles of personal data protection, as well as demonstrating compliance with treatments
    personal data under your responsibility.
        lll. Conclusion
    42. In view of the foregoing and because there is no other corective measure capable of safeguarding the rights of titles
                                                                                            to the national institute
    data, the CNPD decides, under the paragraph y) of paragraph 2 of article 58.0 of the GDPR, to order
    of Statistics1.P.the suspension of the sending of personal data from the 2021 Census to the USA and to other countries
    without an adequate level of protection, whether through Cloudflare, lnc., or another company, the term
    maximum of 12 hours.
    43. The same entity must also ensure, in the context of any subconditions, that the subcontractors
    are not obliged to comply with legislation that removes the protection conferred by the RGPD.
  r3Vern.0107e 121of the cited action.
  ra '183
    cf.n.os63e of the same judgment
                                                                                                          geral@cnpd.pt
                                                    Av.D.Carlos, 134.10 T (+351) 213928400
                                                        1200 {51 Lisboa F (+ 35 ', 213 97632 r / vww.cnpd.pt AVG1202I401 4v
44. The hearing is waived, under the terms of paragraph a.) Of no. 1 of article124.0 of the Code of Procedure
Administrative, considering the urgency of the corrective measure, taking into account the time period
                                                                                                gives
                    what,
online of the Census and otherwise, the ILO would remain for the rights, freedoms and guarantees of
potentially more than four million, who have not yet fulfilled their legal obligation to respond to
census operation.
Approved at the meeting of April 27, 2021
FilipaCalvão (President)
</pre>
</pre>

Revision as of 08:35, 28 April 2021

CNPD - Deliberação/2021/533
LogoPT.png
Authority: CNPD (Portugal)
Jurisdiction: Portugal
Relevant Law: Article 9 GDPR
Article 44 GDPR
Article 46 GDPR
Type: Investigation
Outcome: Violation Found
Started:
Decided: 27.04.2021
Published: 28.04.2021
Fine: None
Parties: lnstituto Nacional de Estatística, l.P.
Cloudflare, lnc.
National Case Number/Name: Deliberação/2021/533
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: n/a
Original Language(s): Portuguese
Original Source: CNPD Deliberação (in PT)
Initial Contributor: n/a

The Portuguese DPA ordered the National Statistical Institute to stop all data transfers to a service provider located in the US.

English Summary

Facts

The Portuguese National Statistical Institute gathers data for their census through a form in their website, using the services of Cloudfare, a service provider based in the US.

Dispute

Holding

in progress

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the Portuguese original. Please refer to the Portuguese original for more details.

CNPD 
National Commission for Data Protection 
DELIBERATION/2021 / 533 
1. introduction 
1. 
The National Commission for Data Protection (CNPD) has received more than a dozen participations regarding the ongoing census operation - Census 2021 - carried out by the National Statistics Institute, I.P. (INE), which in part is done by filling out the form available online at https://censos2021.ine.pt/. The greatest number of participations is related to the fact that the survey requires citizens to provide their identification data, namely their full name. However, some respondents associated the requirement to provide identifying data with the transfer of data to a company based in the United States of America. 

2. 
2. The same question was also asked on social networks, and media outlets reported that the information displayed there was inaccurate. 

3. 
3. The ACNPD, under the powers conferred by Article 58(1)(b) and (e) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), in conjunction with Article 3, Article 4(2) and Article 6(1)(b), all of which are applicable to the processing of personal data, is responsible for the protection of personal data. 1 of article 6, all of Law 58/2019, of 8August (which aims to ensure the implementation, in the internal legal order, of the GDPR), has analyzed the website of Statistics Portugal and the platform made available therein, and concluded that this entity uses services provided by the company Cloudflare. Statistics Portugal was also requested to provide information on this operation regarding personal data. 

li. 
Analysis 

i. 
Facts found 

4. 
The Census 2021 data collection form is accessed through the infrastructure provided by Cloudflare, lnc. (hereinafter Cloudflare), a company based in San Francisco, California, in the United States of America. This company provides various Internet security and Content Delivery Network (CDN) services. 

5. 
The CDN consists of a network of servers that aims to reduce the latency of access to servers -i.e., the period of time between the user's action and the response to that action. In effect, through an algorithm that sends information simultaneously to several servers, it chooses the one with the shortest response time. With this, it is possible to deliver information faster and with greater robustness from the point of view of security. 

6. 
ACloudflare owns 200 {hundred} datacenters located in over one hundred countries, the vast majority of which do not have an adequate level of data protection, under the terms of article 45.0 of the RGPD. 

7. 
OINE used the services provided by the company Cloudflare through the onlined subscription to its Business Plan1. This plan provides a set of services, and INE is currently making use of WAF2, the CDN, and Rate Limit3. 

8. This plan is governed by the 'Self-Serve Subscription Agreement'4 (main service provision agreement) and the data processing addendum (Data Processing Addendum version 3.05), dated October 1st, 2020, which is part of the main agreement (see clause 6.1 of the main agreement). 

9. INE justified the conclusion of this contract with the objective of "(...) effectively responding to the performance and information security needs associated with the size and complexity of the Census 2021 operation". 

10. Notwithstanding the use of this service, it is not, nor has it ever been, in question that the information provided by citizens through the Censos 2021 forms is hosted in INE's servers. 

11 . When the citizen accesses the Census 2021 form, it is forwarded to one of Cloudflare's servers according to the referred algorithm. Cloudflare's infrastructure communicates with the INE server by TLS. 

12. The name censos2021.ine.pt is associated with IP 172.67.41.182, located in the United States of America, and is assigned to Cloudflare. Customers access the site using the HTTPS secure communication protocol, and the associated certificate is issued by Cloudflare, Inc ECC CA-3, a certification body of Cloudflare itself. Thus, this company holds both the private key and the plastic key, 
1 This plan is presented on Cloudflare's website as being aimed at small businesses and e-commerce websites that require advanced performance and security, and that give priority to email support. See httos://www.cloudflare.com/olans/business/ 2A WAF helps secure web applications by filtering and monitoring HTTP traffic. It protects against attacks such as Cross Site Request Forgery, 
Cross Site Scripting, SQLlnjection, and others. 3 Rate limiting protects against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, brute force attacks and other types of malicious behavior. 4 httos://www cloudflare.com/terms/ 
httos://www.cloudflare.com/resources/assets/slt31c6tev37/1 M 1 j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971 b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer OPA v,3 1 -en J Oct 2020.pdf 

13. 
Note that the fact that the encryption key used is Cloudflare's means that the encryption is applied by this entity, remaining during the transit of information, and is deciphered by it, and only by it - i.e., before delivering the whole set of information (the data packages) to INE, Cloudflare has to proceed to its deciphering, and INE has no intervention in this process. 

14. 
Moreover, INE admits that it has no control over the transmission of information between citizens and its server. Once inside Cloudflare's CON network, Statistics Portugal has no way of knowing whether the traffic is being directed to servers located in the territory of European Union countries or residing in any other area of the world. 

15. 
As of the date of this deliberation, personal data of more than six million citizens residing in the national territory has been collected. 


ii. Assessment in light of the RGPD 
16 Since the information provided by citizens when filling out the Census 2021 forms constitutes personal data, under the terms of article 4.0, paragraph 1), of the RGPO - since it corresponds to information on identified natural persons -, the census operation is subject to the RGPO, and Statistics Portugal is responsible for the processing, in accordance with paragraphs 2) and 7) of the same article.

17. It is also true that some of the information falls into the category of specific personal data provided for in Article 9(1) of the RGPO, and therefore the data processing is subject to a stricter protection regime and to the obligation to carry out a data protection impact assessment (DPA), in accordance with Article 9(1) and (3)(b) of the RGPO. 

18. 
It should be noted that the AIPO must cover all operations on personal data, including, therefore, the operation corresponding to the transport of information to and from Cloudflare's servers, in the scope of the outsourcing relationship.  

19. On this point, INE declared to the CNPO that "(...) it has chosen to carry out a Data Protection Impact Assessment only for the main statistical operation. This was due to the fact that the tests (2016, 2018, 2020) only aimed at testing collection processes and application functionalities, and were, as far as the application solutions were concerned, partial. Therefore, they did not allow for testing and evaluating the risk inherent in all processes. In this sense, only the final operation allowed for a complete and comprehensive assessment 
)
in a scenario where the decisions taken, given the pandemic context, were being modified and optimized. However, the respective contents are not yet integrated in such a way as to be made immediately available. Although the systematic and continuous monitoring of the EPD and RSI to the Census 2021 is guaranteed." 

20. 
20. As an impact assessment was not carried out for this specific operation on personal data, Statistics Portugal did not carry out an assessment of the risks for the rights of data subjects and, consequently, did not adopt any additional measures to mitigate these risks, focusing only on the performance and security of the system, including consulting the National Security Office. 

21. 
21. Statistics Portugal did not consult the CNPD on this operation, which would have allowed the CNPD to make a statement and thus seek to protect the rights of the data subjects. 

22. 
However, even considering the purpose of this operation, there were other solutions that could have mitigated the risks, ensuring greater control over the data by Statistics Portugal, and, of course, limiting the transit of personal data to the territory of EU Member States, which would not imply sending them to third countries. 

23. 
However, the choice of the NSI implies, as will be shown, the transit of personal data through third countries in relation to the European Union and which do not have the adequate level of protection. It also implies, by virtue of the contract signed, a specific authorization by INE to transfer personal data to the United States of America (USA) and to other countries where the servers used by Cloudflare are located (namely, South Africa, China, India, Jordan, Mexico, Russia, Singapore). 

24. 
As described above, in points 5 and 11, the personal data of citizens residing in Portugal are sent to Cloudflare servers located in different countries that are neither identified nor identifiable by INE or by the data subjects. Moreover, the encryption and decryption key is owned by Cloudflare. 


25. The contract concluded between Statistics Portugal and Cloudflare foresees the transit of personal data to any of the 200 servers used by Cloudflare, as well as the transfer of personal data to the USA.

26. Indeed, under the terms of the Data Processing Addendum version 3.0 (hereinafter 'OPA'), which, it is recalled, forms part of 
contract, personal data are transferred from the customer (data exporter) to Cloudflare (data importer), in the United States of America, using as international transfer mechanism the standard contractual clauses based on Commission Decision 2010/87/EU of 5 February 2010, applicable transfers of personal data to processors established in third countries6 , which are an integral part of the Addendum and are to that extent endorsed by the customer (cf. clause 1.1(m) of the DPA)7. 

27. 
The PPA applies to the extent that Cloudflare processes personal data submitted by the customer to Cloudflare or, as is the case with INE, collected and processed by the customer using the service, where such personal data is subject to applicable data protection legislation. 

28. 
Thus, by (sub)contracting Cloudflare's services, INE, in its capacity of controller and simultaneously of client, accepted the conditions of use of the service, including the amendment to the terms of processing of personal data, which contains a contract between the controller (INE) and the subcontractor (Cloudflare) for the transfer of personal data to the United States of America.

29. 
Also under the terms of the Tender Offer, INEgranted a general authorization to Cloudflare to use other (sub-)subcontractors, whether companies within or outside the Group (clause 4.2), acknowledging and accepting that it may be necessary for the provision of the service to use (sub-)subcontractors established in third countries (clause 6.4). 

30. 
If standard contractual clauses are, in general, a legal instrument for the transfer of personal data to third countries, under the combined provisions of Article 46.0(2)(e) en. 0 5 of the GDPR, it is necessary to verify, however, whether the law of the third country, which obviously overlaps with an instrument of a contractual nature, does not diminish or negate the guarantees offered by these clauses, which aim precisely at compensating for the lack of an adequate level of protection in the country of destination of the data (cf. 

31 . According to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), it is for the data exporter, on a case-by-case basis, in cooperation with the data importer, to ascertain whether the country of destination in question ensures a level of data protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed by the EU and, if possible, to adopt additional safeguards to overcome the obstacles and ensure that data protection is maintained9. This obligation also derives from compliance with the principle of accountability, enshrined in 
Article 5.0.2 of the GDPR. 
6 Conformeconstains from Cloudflare's website. the privacy policy was revised on October 27, 2020, to "reflect- a change in the legal instrument underpinning the transfer of personal data from the European Union (EU) to the United States of America (US), which is no longer the Privacy Sh,eld adequacy decision invalidated by the Court of Justice of the European Union (T JEU) in July 2020. in the Schrems li case, to become the standard contractual clauses 7 httos://www.cloudflare.com/cloudflare customer sccs.pdf 8 See nrs. 92 and 93 of the Schrems li Judgment, in which the Court stressed that the assessment of the existence of a level of protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed in the EU in the country of destination of the data must be made regardless of whether a transfer mechanism provided for in Chapter V of the GDPR is used. 9 See paragraph 134 of the Schrems II judgment.

32. 
According to the CJEU analysis in the Schrems li case, the law of the US -which is the destination country for Cloudflare's international transfers under the standard contractual clauses- allows for interference with the fundamental rights of individuals based on national security and public interest requirements, which may result in access to personal data transferred from the EU to the US and the use of such data in surveillance programs, based on Section 702 of the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) and Executive Order 123331. 

33. 
The TJEU concluded that such interference is not proportionate under EU law as there is no definition of the scope of the limitations on individuals' rights, no clear and precise rules on the application of such measures and no minimum requirements to protect against risks of abuse, no assessment of necessity, no enforceable rights for data subjects and no judicial remedies, so that the limitations on data protection under US law do not meet the requirements of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights11 (cf. Articles 7, 8, 47 and 52(1)). 1). 

34. 
Therefore, a transfer of personal data to the U.S. would be possible if the legislation at stake here, and expressly referred to by the CJEU, were not directly or indirectly applicable to Cloudflare or its (sub-)subcontractors, and even then only by taking additional measures that could demonstrably show that this legislation would not be applicable or would have no practical effect on transfers of personal data. 

35. 
However, the services provided by Cloudflare, namely those contracted by INE when it subscribed to the Business Plan, put the company directly under US law, which imposes on it the obligation to grant bulk access to the personal data it processes, already as a provider of electronic communications services12 , without prejudice to other types of services also being covered by other provisions of the US surveillance legislation. 

36. 
Cloudflare acknowledges in point 7 of the Tender Offer that, in its role as a subcontractor, it may be subject to requests for access to personal data by third parties in the context of legal proceedings, which may be "inconsistent" with the law applicable to its customer, i.e., the GDPR. In such a case, where a conflict of laws exists, Cloudflare declares that it will immediately inform the Customer, "unless such notification is legally prohibited" (cf. a) clause 7.1 ). 


10 See paragraph 165 of the cited judgment, where the PRISM andUPSTREAM programs are cited. 11 See paragraphs 175-176, 180-185, 191 and 94 of the cited judgment. 12 Cf. Section 702 of FISA as amended by 50 use§ 188P.

37. 
This is precisely the case with this US legislation that prevents US companies from informing their customers of access by US authorities for the purpose of gathering information on foreigners in the context of national security activity. 

38. 
Therefore, there is no guarantee that the personal data of citizens residing in Portugal, collected by INE through its website, in the context of Censos 2021, will not be accessed by the US authorities, through Cloudflare, due to the services it provides to INE and which imply, according to the contract signed, the transfer of such personal data to the USA. 

39. 
In this sense, as the standard contractual clauses under which personal data are transferred by the NSI to Cloudflare in the USA cannot be respected in the third country of destination, insofar as they are not binding on the authorities of that country, thus not offering the appropriate guarantees required by the GDPR, the CNPD is obliged to prohibit these data transfers, as prescribed by the CJEU.13 

40. 
Furthermore, according to the same case law 14, even if the NSI could demonstrate that the personal data was not transferred to the U.S., the transit of the data would always depend on the adoption of adequate and sufficient additional measures, which are not present here. 


41 . Under Article 5(2) and Article 24 of the GDPR, Statistics Portugal is obliged to comply with the principles and rules on personal data protection and to demonstrate compliance with the processing of personal data under its responsibility. 

III. Conclusion 
42. 
In view of the above and as there is no other corrective measure capable of safeguarding the rights of data subjects, the CNPD, under paragraph}) of Article 58(2) of the GDPR, hereby orders Instituto Nacional de Estatística, I.P., to suspend the sending of personal data from Censos 2021 to the USA and to other third countries without an adequate level of protection, whether through Cloudflare, lnc. or another company, within a maximum period of 12 hours. 

43. 
The same entity shall also ensure, in the scope of any subcontracting, that subcontractors are not obliged to comply with a legislation that departs from the protection conferred by the RGPD. 

44. 
The hearing is waived, in accordance with Article 124.1 a) of the Administrative Procedure Code, considering the urgency of the corrective measure, taking into account the time period of the online collection of the Census and that, otherwise, the risk to the rights, freedoms and guarantees of citizens, potentially more than four million, who have not yet fulfilled their legal obligation to respond to the census operation, would remain. 


13 See paras. 107 and 121 of the cited judgment. 14 Cf. nos. 63 and 183 of the same accd. 
Approved at the meeting of April 27, 2021 

< 
Filipa Galvão (Chair)