https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&feed=atom&action=historyOVG Bautzen - 3 B 357/20 - Revision history2024-03-29T06:46:40ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.39.6https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=36685&oldid=prev208.127.175.94: typo2023-11-27T11:22:46Z<p>typo</p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 11:22, 27 November 2023</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l68">Line 68:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 68:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>===Dispute===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>===Dispute===</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Did the defendant have the power to pass the legislation in question, which interferes with the economic life and privacy of citizens? Has the regulation violated the rules of the GDPR, especially the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">priciple </del>of proportionality?</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Did the defendant have the power to pass the legislation in question, which interferes with the economic life and privacy of citizens? Has the regulation violated the rules of the GDPR, especially the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">principle </ins>of proportionality?</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>===Holding===</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>===Holding===</div></td></tr>
</table>208.127.175.94https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=19572&oldid=prevFD: /* Comment */2021-09-15T12:05:29Z<p><span dir="auto"><span class="autocomment">Comment</span></span></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 12:05, 15 September 2021</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l78">Line 78:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 78:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court, referring to the alleged violation of the provisions of the GDPR, pointed out that [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] allow processing of personal data, if the processing is necessary to fulfil a legal obligation. Furthermore, the processing of personal data is permitted to the extent necessary for the performance of a task in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority. In turn, [[Article 6 GDPR#2|Article 6(2) GDPR]] empowers Member States to adopt more detailed rules in this regard. [[Article 6 GDPR#3|Article 6(#0 GDPR]] further provides that the legal basis for processing operations under [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] shall be determined by Union law or by the law of the Member State to which the person responsible is subject. The purposes of the processing must be laid down in that legal basis or, in respect of processing under [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] - it must be necessary for the performance of a task which is in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the person responsible. This legal basis may include specific provisions aimed at adapting the application of the provisions of the GDPR, including those concerning the general conditions governing the lawfulness of data processing by a Member State.</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court, referring to the alleged violation of the provisions of the GDPR, pointed out that [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] allow processing of personal data, if the processing is necessary to fulfil a legal obligation. Furthermore, the processing of personal data is permitted to the extent necessary for the performance of a task in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority. In turn, [[Article 6 GDPR#2|Article 6(2) GDPR]] empowers Member States to adopt more detailed rules in this regard. [[Article 6 GDPR#3|Article 6(#0 GDPR]] further provides that the legal basis for processing operations under [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] shall be determined by Union law or by the law of the Member State to which the person responsible is subject. The purposes of the processing must be laid down in that legal basis or, in respect of processing under [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] - it must be necessary for the performance of a task which is in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the person responsible. This legal basis may include specific provisions aimed at adapting the application of the provisions of the GDPR, including those concerning the general conditions governing the lawfulness of data processing by a Member State.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court held that the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation is indeed a sector-specific national law of the Land legislature concerning the processing of personal data which contains more detailed provisions in accordance with [[Article GDPR <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">6#2</del>|Article 6(2) GDPR]] and [[Article GDPR <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">6#3</del>|Article 6(3) GDPR]] for adaptation to the application of [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]].</div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court held that the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation is indeed a sector-specific national law of the Land legislature concerning the processing of personal data which contains more detailed provisions in accordance with [[Article <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">6 </ins>GDPR|Article 6(2) GDPR]] and [[Article <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">6 </ins>GDPR|Article 6(3) GDPR]] for adaptation to the application of [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]].</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The court stressed that national legislation must comply with constitutional requirements. Whether or not it was possible to regulate the processing of personal data in the area of contact tracing by means of a regulation is an open-ended question, and this is a matter of dispute in the case-law. </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The court stressed that national legislation must comply with constitutional requirements. Whether or not it was possible to regulate the processing of personal data in the area of contact tracing by means of a regulation is an open-ended question, and this is a matter of dispute in the case-law. </div></td></tr>
</table>FDhttps://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=12640&oldid=prevIsabel Hahn at 08:27, 2 December 20202020-12-02T08:27:11Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:27, 2 December 2020</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l58">Line 58:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 58:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Superior Administrative Court of Bautzen (OVG Bautzen) found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation restricted an applicant's freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, which are guaranteed by the Constitution, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Superior Administrative Court of Bautzen (OVG Bautzen) found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation restricted an applicant's freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, which are guaranteed by the Constitution, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, </del>who does not want her data to be collected<del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">, even if it may be illegal</del>. </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant who does not want her data to be collected. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==English Summary==</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==English Summary==</div></td></tr>
</table>Isabel Hahnhttps://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=12639&oldid=prevIsabel Hahn at 08:11, 2 December 20202020-12-02T08:11:38Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 08:11, 2 December 2020</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l56">Line 56:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 56:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Superior Administrative Court Bautzen found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">restricts the </del>applicant's freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, guaranteed by the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Constutution</del>, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </del></div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div><ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">The </ins>Superior Administrative Court <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">of </ins>Bautzen <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">(OVG Bautzen) </ins>found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">restricted an </ins>applicant's freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">which are </ins>guaranteed by the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">Constitution</ins>, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"> </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant, who does not want her data to be collected, even if it may be illegal. </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-side-deleted"></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant, who does not want her data to be collected, even if it may be illegal. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==English Summary==</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>==English Summary==</div></td></tr>
<!-- diff cache key gdprwiki:diff::1.12:old-12536:rev-12639 -->
</table>Isabel Hahnhttps://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=12536&oldid=prevARapcewicz at 17:25, 30 November 20202020-11-30T17:25:26Z<p></p>
<table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="en">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 17:25, 30 November 2020</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l56">Line 56:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 56:</td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>}}</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="−"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Superior Administrative Court Bautzen found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation restricts the <del style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">apliccant</del>'s freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, guaranteed by the Constutution, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. </div></td><td class="diff-marker" data-marker="+"></td><td style="color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>Superior Administrative Court Bautzen found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation restricts the <ins style="font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">applicant</ins>'s freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, guaranteed by the Constutution, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant, who does not want her data to be collected, even if it may be illegal. </div></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant, who does not want her data to be collected, even if it may be illegal. </div></td></tr>
<tr><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td><td class="diff-marker"></td><td style="background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #202122; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><br/></td></tr>
</table>ARapcewiczhttps://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=12535&oldid=prevARapcewicz at 17:24, 30 November 20202020-11-30T17:24:16Z<p></p>
<a href="https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=12535&oldid=12534">Show changes</a>ARapcewiczhttps://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=OVG_Bautzen_-_3_B_357/20&diff=12534&oldid=prevARapcewicz: Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Germany |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=OVG Bautzen |Court_With_Country=OVG Bautzen (Germany) |Case_Number_N..."2020-11-30T16:57:28Z<p>Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Germany |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=OVG Bautzen |Court_With_Country=OVG Bautzen (Germany) |Case_Number_N..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{COURTdecisionBOX<br />
<br />
|Jurisdiction=Germany<br />
|Court-BG-Color=<br />
|Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png<br />
|Court_Abbrevation=OVG Bautzen<br />
|Court_With_Country=OVG Bautzen (Germany)<br />
<br />
|Case_Number_Name=3 B 357/20<br />
|ECLI=<br />
<br />
|Original_Source_Name_1=Sächsisches Oberverwaltungsgericht - Entscheidungssammlung <br />
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.justiz.sachsen.de//ovgentschweb/documents/20B357.B01.pdf<br />
|Original_Source_Language_1=German<br />
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=DE<br />
<br />
|Date_Decided=11.11.2020<br />
|Date_Published=<br />
|Year=2020<br />
<br />
|GDPR_Article_1=Article 5 GDPR<br />
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 5 GDPR<br />
|GDPR_Article_2=Article 6(1)(c) GDPR<br />
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=Article 6 GDPR#1c<br />
|GDPR_Article_3=Article 6(1)(e) GDPR<br />
|GDPR_Article_Link_3=Article 6 GDPR#1e<br />
|GDPR_Article_4=Article 6(2) GDPR<br />
|GDPR_Article_Link_4=Article 6 GDPR#2<br />
|GDPR_Article_5=Article 6(3) GDPR<br />
|GDPR_Article_Link_5=Article 6 GDPR#3<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
|Party_Name_1=Freistaat Sachsen<br />
|Party_Link_1=<br />
|Party_Name_2=<br />
|Party_Link_2=<br />
|Party_Name_3=<br />
|Party_Link_3=<br />
|Party_Name_4=<br />
|Party_Link_4=<br />
|Party_Name_5=<br />
|Party_Link_5=<br />
<br />
|Appeal_From_Body=<br />
|Appeal_From_Case_Number_Name=<br />
|Appeal_From_Status=<br />
|Appeal_From_Link=<br />
|Appeal_To_Body=<br />
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name=<br />
|Appeal_To_Status=<br />
|Appeal_To_Link=<br />
<br />
|Initial_Contributor=Agnieszka Rapcewicz<br />
|<br />
}}<br />
<br />
Superior Administrative Court Bautzen found that although the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation restricts the apliccant's freedom of occupation and in general the right to private undertakings, guaranteed by the Constutution, it is justified by the protection of life and health of a large number of people. The Court also held that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. <br />
It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant, who does not want her data to be collected, even if it may be illegal. <br />
<br />
== English Summary ==<br />
<br />
=== Facts ===<br />
With effect from 2 November 2020, the State Ministry of Social Affairs and Social Cohesion has ordered the defendant to adopt the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation. According to this regulation, it is prohibited to open and operate, with the exception of permitted online offers of, among others, establishments providing body-care services, with the exception of medically necessary treatment and hairdressers. <br />
<br />
The applicant runs a nail studio and cosmetics company, trades in cosmetic products and holds seminars. The applicant considered that the defendant's legislation was discriminatory, violated the Constitution and personal data protection regulations. Therefore, she lodged a complaint with the Court.<br />
<br />
=== Dispute ===<br />
Did the defendant have the power to pass the legislation in question, which interferes with the economic life and privacy of citizens? Has the regulation violated the rules of the GDPR, especially the priciple of proportionality?<br />
<br />
=== Holding ===<br />
The complaint was rejected.<br />
<br />
== Comment ==<br />
The main reason for lodging the complaint was the exclusion of the applicant's beauty salon from normal operation. She claimed that the rules introduced by the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation are discriminatory and, moreover, such restrictions and interference with citizens' privacy can only be introduced by rules issued by Parliament and not by the defendant (Freistaat Sachsen). Additionally, the applicant also complained of a breach of the GDPR, in particular, the principle of data minimisation laid down in [[Article 5 GDPR]].<br />
<br />
The Court, referring to the alleged violation of the provisions of the GDPR, pointed out that [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] allow processing of personal data, if the processing is necessary to fulfil a legal obligation. Furthermore, the processing of personal data is permitted to the extent necessary for the performance of a task in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority. In turn, [[Article 6 GDPR#2|Article 6(2) GDPR]] empowers Member States to adopt more detailed rules in this regard. [[Article 6 GDPR#3|Article 6(#0 GDPR]] further provides that the legal basis for processing operations under [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] shall be determined by Union law or by the law of the Member State to which the person responsible is subject. The purposes of the processing must be laid down in that legal basis or, in respect of processing under [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]] - it must be necessary for the performance of a task which is in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the person responsible. This legal basis may include specific provisions aimed at adapting the application of the provisions of the GDPR, including those concerning the general conditions governing the lawfulness of data processing by a Member State.<br />
<br />
The Court held that the Saxon Corona Protection Regulation is indeed a sector-specific national law of the Land legislature concerning the processing of personal data which contains more detailed provisions in accordance with [[Article GDPR 6#2|Article 6(2) GDPR]] and [[Article GDPR 6#3|Article 6(3) GDPR]] for adaptation to the application of [[Article 6 GDPR#1c|Article 6(1)(c) GDPR]] and [[Article 6 GDPR#1e|Article 6(1)(e) GDPR]].<br />
<br />
The court stressed that national legislation must comply with constitutional requirements. Whether or not it was possible to regulate the processing of personal data in the area of contact tracing by means of a regulation is an open-ended question, and this is a matter of dispute in the case-law. <br />
<br />
The Court stated that provisions of the regulation meet the specific data protection requirements. They define in concrete and normative terms who is to collect and store the data, for which reason data must be collected, which data to collect, and, where appropriate, to be communicated to the competent authorities (name, telephone number or e-mail address and postcode of visitors and the period of the visit), how long the data must be stored (for one month after the end of the visit) and that they must subsequently be deleted, the purpose for which the data must be deleted, who is responsible for the transmission of these<br />
data (the authorities responsible for infection control), the purpose for which this transmission may be requested (to track infections) and how misuse of the data is prevented (by order of the<br />
protection against inspection by third parties and by prohibition of processing for other purposes, unless otherwise provided for by federal law).<br />
<br />
The Court found that the collection and processing of contact details also complies with the principle of proportionality. It is suitable and necessary to enable the tracing of contacts of corona infected persons and thus make a significant contribution to prevent the transmission of the virus.<br />
<br />
The Court pointed out that the applicant complaint of a breach of the requirement to minimise data has not been further explained. Which of the data to be collected should not be necessary for contact tracing is not apparent in any other way either. Doubts may arise in this respect with regard to the visitor's postcode, which may, however, also be relevant for identification purposes if e-mail or phone number should be illegible.<br />
<br />
In the end, the Court found that the collection of contact data as a basis for contact tracing is an essential contribution to combating the spread of the pandemic and to prevent significant risks to life and health of people. It therefore serves the interests of the community, which take precedence over the interests of the applicant, who does not want her data to be collected, even if it may be illegal. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
== Further Resources ==<br />
''Share blogs or news articles here!''<br />
<br />
== English Machine Translation of the Decision ==<br />
The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.<br />
<br />
<pre><br />
<br />
</pre></div>ARapcewicz