Rb. Gelderland - C/05/404834 / HA ZA 22-245: Revision history

From GDPRhub

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

23 November 2022

22 November 2022

  • curprev 12:4312:43, 22 November 2022Jg talk contribs 36,630 bytes −38 changed the short summary to make it shorter and more to the point undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 11:2911:29, 22 November 2022Jg talk contribs 36,668 bytes +1,160 I elaborated on the arguments in the Holding. Those can be more detailed than the Facts! You did get to the core of the case in the holding and explained what you wrote well, good summary. I also added a small comment about the part on Rv. undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 09:5609:56, 22 November 2022Jg talk contribs 35,508 bytes −935 Facts: Use simple past consistently. Write an amount of money as '35.000' instead of '35,000.00'. I removed the description of the controller's claims as it is not relevant for the gdprhub. If you read the facts closely you see that defendant 1 and 2 are only 1 person, so 1 data subject. You introduce the data subject and the controller at the beginning of the summary. I removed the last three sentences at the end. undo Tag: Visual edit

17 November 2022

14 November 2022