Rb. Rotterdam - 9900906: Revision history

From GDPRhub

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

29 November 2022

25 November 2022

  • curprev 12:5912:59, 25 November 2022Jg talk contribs 18,813 bytes +78 added links to the articles Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 12:5712:57, 25 November 2022Jg talk contribs 18,735 bytes +1,514 →‎Holding: I don't understand this sentence: The Court formulated two claims where the claim seeking for name and address details was instituted for the purpose of indemnification. The holding is too short and the facts are taken out of context, making them incorrect. Please read my take on the holding to see if you understand it! Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 12:4412:44, 25 November 2022Jg talk contribs 17,221 bytes +778 Facts: Elaborate more on the controller; it is not sure that the defendant took out the insurance himself (hence 'allegedly'); after introducing the controller by name, refer only to it as 'the controller'; added part about false claims; to the facts, you can also add the arguments of the defendant and the controller. You can divide the facts into two parts: facts before the proceedings and facts during the proceedings and facts during the proceedings. The facts were too short Tag: Visual edit

24 November 2022

16 November 2022