Search results

an opinion on the certification requirements referred to in Article 43(8); (r) provide the Commission with an opinion on the icons referred to in Article

institution would also fall within the scope of Article 89 GDPR. Under Recital 160 “[w]here personal data are processed for historical research purposes, this Regulation

convictions under Article 10 GDPR. See, Albers, Veit, in BeckOK DatenschutzR, Article 9 GDPR, margin number 18 (C.H. Beck 2021, 38th Edition). The CJEU

Not to be offered to the Recipient Interim opening practicability H o w F o f b o a r d s Treatment round: 27/01/2021,(1 B ru ssel Section Market Court room

16Council of State no. 43.526, June 29, 1993, Arr. R.v.St. 1993, z.p.; BREED. 1993, z.p.; TBP 1994, 225. rPAGE 01-00003026497-0021-0025- □2- □1-� �Jl.� � L

first senate of 15. Dezember 1983 - 1 BvR 209/83, 1 BvR 269/83, 1 BvR 362/83, 1 BvR 420/83, 1 BvR 440/83, 1 BvR 484/83 (in DE) (Abstract in EN) - ECLI:

prosecution is undesirable (a so-called policy dismissal). T he M arket h o w a t w a ck both respect the orm e le and the material obligation to state reasons

§ 3 WG (cf. BGH, judgment of April 10, 2004 - IV ZR 75/03, r+s 2004, 404, 405; OLG Hamm, r+s 1992, 390 each on § 5 WG old version). However, the plaintiff

and Mr W have been involved in a dispute for some years. a dispute. The dispute concerns, inter alia, harassment and verbal aggression by Mr W and the

d violation of articles 11 of Legislative Decree no. 196 of 2003 and 5 of r R egolam ent (U E) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and o Council, because

own profile (applications r) - v)) and - "Group 4": improved means of contacting the defendant for paying doctors (applications w) - x)). With regard to the

period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10, § 100)

article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels - 2019/AR/1600- p. 3 - •

not outweigh the interests of the data subject (op. cit. marginal 101 f. m.w.r.). In this weighing up of interests, not only the type (criticality) and scope

203/22, r+s 2023, 265 Rn. 17; BGH ruling of April 22, 2022 – VI ZR 147/21, r+s 2022, 478 Rn. 6; BGH judgment of March 7, 2017 – VI ZR 125/16, r+s 2017,

data. This is in line with case-law by the Austrian Administrative Court (W 258 2217446-1 on the presumed "affinity for a political party"). the data subject

case of the plaintiff party C***** W*****, represented by T*****, against the defendant party Ö*****, represented by W*****, for EUR 2,500.00 s.A, on the

plaintiff, (Agent: mr. R.J.G. Ensink), and The college of mayor and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name

officio 4. 3R.v.St., June 29, 1993, e.g. Vedesca, no. 43,526. 4 MAREEN, D., The motives of the administrative legal act, TBP 2000, 20-38. See also: R.v.St.,

2018, against the N*** party E***stadt (respondent), represented by Erich R***, for violation of the right to secrecy as follows - The complaint is dismissed