The High Court - 2021 IEHC 287: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
Line 57: Line 57:


=== Facts ===
=== Facts ===
A short life account on Instagram has posted inappropriate, vulgar and sexual messages about a school staff. The messages were deleted and the account taken down after the school's solicitor posted request on the accounts, The school was able to access the password of the account via a student. The objective of these proceedings is to compel the social media platform, Instagram, to identify the individuals behind one of its user accounts.  The proceedings are taken by the board of management of a secondary school (“the school authorities”).  The school authorities apprehend that the now inactive user account had been operated by individuals who are either students or staff members of the school. The school authorities seek to identify these individuals for the stated purpose of “dealing with” them by way of what the school authorities describe as a “disciplinary or pastoral response”. The school authorities sought to contact the company providing the social media platform and requested information with a view to identifying the individuals who had operated the user account.  Facebook Ireland Ltd.’s position is that Our  client  cannot  disclose  user  information  to  a  private  third  party  without  a  court  order  or  request  from  law  enforcement.    Any  court  order  or  law  enforcement  request  requiring  disclosure  of  account  information must be addressed to and served upon Facebook Ireland, identify the Instagram account at issue by specific uniform resource locator (‘URL’)
A short life account on Instagram has posted inappropriate, vulgar and sexual messages about a school staff. The messages were deleted and the account taken down after the school's solicitor posted request on the account, The school was further able to access the password via a student. The objective of these proceedings is to compel the social media platform, Instagram, to identify the individuals behind one of its user accounts.  The proceedings are taken by the board of management of a secondary school.  The school authorities apprehend that the now inactive user account had been operated by individuals who are either students or staff members of the school. They seek to identify these individuals for the stated purpose of “dealing with” them by way of what they describe as a “disciplinary or pastoral response”. The school authorities sought to contact the company providing the social media platform and requested information with a view to identifying the individuals who had operated the user account.  Facebook Ireland Ltd.’s position is they cannot  disclose  user  information  to  a  private  third  party  without  a  court  order  or  request  from  law  enforcement to be addressed to and served upon Facebook Ireland, to identify the Instagram account at issue by specific uniform resource locator (‘URL’)


=== Dispute ===
=== Dispute ===

Revision as of 17:51, 20 May 2021

The High Court - 2021 IEHC 287
Courts logo1.png
Court: The High Court (Ireland)
Jurisdiction: Ireland
Relevant Law: Article 6(1)(c) GDPR
Article 23 GDPR
Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
Decided: 19.05.2021
Published:
Parties: BOARD OF MANAGEMENT OF SALESIAN SECONDARY COLLEGE (LIMERICK)
FACEBOOK IRELAND LIMITED
FACEBOOK IRELAND LIMITED
National Case Number/Name: 2021 IEHC 287
European Case Law Identifier: 2020 No. 1419 P
Appeal from:
Appeal to:
Original Language(s): English
Original Source: High Court Ireland (in English)
Initial Contributor: Tara Taubman-Bassirian

School request the disclosure of identities of instagram account holders from Facebook. Facebook oppose by requesting a court order. The High Court judge making a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice pursuant to Article 267 of the TFEU. The parties were invited to make submissions in respect of the necessity for same. The school authorities filed written submissions on 22 April 2021. Counsel for the school confirmed, at a directions hearing on 18 May 2021, that his side were content to rest on the written submissions and did not require a further oral hearing.

English Summary

Facts

A short life account on Instagram has posted inappropriate, vulgar and sexual messages about a school staff. The messages were deleted and the account taken down after the school's solicitor posted request on the account, The school was further able to access the password via a student. The objective of these proceedings is to compel the social media platform, Instagram, to identify the individuals behind one of its user accounts. The proceedings are taken by the board of management of a secondary school. The school authorities apprehend that the now inactive user account had been operated by individuals who are either students or staff members of the school. They seek to identify these individuals for the stated purpose of “dealing with” them by way of what they describe as a “disciplinary or pastoral response”. The school authorities sought to contact the company providing the social media platform and requested information with a view to identifying the individuals who had operated the user account. Facebook Ireland Ltd.’s position is they cannot disclose user information to a private third party without a court order or request from law enforcement to be addressed to and served upon Facebook Ireland, to identify the Instagram account at issue by specific uniform resource locator (‘URL’)

Dispute

The disclosure application presents significant legal issues in respect of privacy, data protection and freedom of expression. For the reasons set out in this judgment, I have concluded that it is necessary to make a reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling on these issues. This reference will be made pursuant to Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (“TFEU”)

Holding

making a reference for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justicepursuant to Article 267 of the TFEU. The parties were invited to make submissions in respect of the necessity for same. The school authorities filed written submissions on 22 April 2021. Counsel for the school confirmed, at a directions hearing on 18 May 2021, that his side were content to rest on the written submissions and did not require a further oral hearing.


Comment

It worth to highlight that the facts date back mid October 2019, while to court decision has been made May 2021, a mare one year and 7 months later, the school authorities have been chasing the authors of the publications.

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the English original. Please refer to the English original for more details.