Search results
From GDPRhub
- provided the complainant with the opportunity to rebut the arguments made by the [jg On the 1S March 2023, the complainant through her legal counsel, rebutted29 KB (4,620 words) - 14:50, 6 December 2023
- Data Protection Regulation DPC Inquiry Reference: IN-18-5-6 In the matter of JG, a complainant, concerning a complaint directed against WhatsApp Ireland Limited32 KB (4,686 words) - 14:17, 1 February 2023
- liability OLA NETHERLANDS BV , Located in Amsterdam, defendant, attorney mr. JG Reus in Amsterdam. The applicants will hereinafter also be jointly referred57 KB (9,498 words) - 20:42, 28 April 2021
- stated that the term "public way within the meaning of Section 55 Paragraph 2 JG" used in the hunting law by the XXXX state legislature did not always correspond122 KB (20,266 words) - 16:25, 31 October 2023
- such as mail forwarding, mailboxes or storage permits. In this case, it is miJg/ich that we use your data for market research such as satisfaction surveys69 KB (11,077 words) - 16:48, 7 March 2022
- para. 4.6. and 4.7., Rb. Rotterdam 21 January 2020, ECLI:NL:RBROT:2020:515, JG 2020/20 m.nt. C. Raat (X/State) (the annotator is quite critical) and Rb.241 KB (42,617 words) - 14:14, 13 September 2022
- is admissible under § 47 (1) No. 2 VwGO in conjunction with § 24 (1) SächsJG. According to this, the Saxon Higher Administrative Court decides on the validity111 KB (18,198 words) - 11:22, 27 November 2023
