Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/03293 (decision 2): Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
|DPA-BG-Color=
|DPA-BG-Color=
|DPAlogo=LogoNO.png
|DPAlogo=LogoNO.png
|DPA_Abbrevation=Datatilsynet (Norway)
|DPA_Abbrevation=Datatilsynet
|DPA_With_Country=Datatilsynet (Norway)
|DPA_With_Country=Datatilsynet (Norway)


Line 11: Line 11:


|Original_Source_Name_1=Datatilsynet
|Original_Source_Name_1=Datatilsynet
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.datatilsynet.no/contentassets/b8f80f9ade934d2b9ec2d51cc165e0b3/vedtak-om-palegg---brevkontroll-med-kriminalomsorgens-behandling-av-personopplysninger.pdf
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.datatilsynet.no/aktuelt/aktuelle-nyheter-2022/varsel-om-vedtak-om-palegg-til-kriminalomsorgsdirektoratet/
|Original_Source_Language_1=Norwegian
|Original_Source_Language_1=Norwegian
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=NO
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=NO
|Original_Source_Name_2=Preliminary inspection report
|Original_Source_Link_2=https://www.datatilsynet.no/contentassets/d7b778fca25d48ffa4ccb7d077c33251/20_03293-42-kontrollrapport-til-publisering.pdf
|Original_Source_Language_2=Norwegian
|Original_Source_Language__Code_2=NO
|Original_Source_Name_3=sdfd
|Original_Source_Link_3=https://www.datatilsynet.no/contentassets/d7b778fca25d48ffa4ccb7d077c33251/20_03293-53-oversendelse-av-forelopig-kontrollrapport-og-varsel-om-vedtak---tilsyn-med-kriminalomsorgen.pdf
|Original_Source_Language_3=Norwegian
|Original_Source_Language__Code_3=NO
|Original_Source_Name_4=
|Original_Source_Link_4=
|Original_Source_Language_4=
|Original_Source_Language__Code_4=


|Type=Investigation
|Type=Investigation
|Outcome=Violation Found
|Outcome=Violation Found
|Date_Decided=26.08.2021
|Date_Started=09.11.2021
|Date_Published=01.09.2021
|Date_Decided=24.06.2022
|Year=2021
|Date_Published=07.07.2022
|Fine=None
|Year=2022
|Fine=
|Currency=
|Currency=


|GDPR_Article_1=Article 30 GDPR
|GDPR_Article_1=
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 30 GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=
|GDPR_Article_2=
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=


|EU_Law_Name_1=
|EU_Law_Link_1=
|EU_Law_Name_2=
|EU_Law_Link_2=


|National_Law_Name_1=Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2000 §14
|National_Law_Name_1=Norwegian Execution of Sentences Act Chapter 1A and 1B
|National_Law_Link_1=
|National_Law_Link_1=https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLE/lov/2001-05-18-21
|National_Law_Name_2=Norwegian Regulation on personal data processing §2-4
|National_Law_Name_2=Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2000
|National_Law_Link_2=https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2018-06-15-876
|National_Law_Link_2=https://lovdata.no/dokument/NLO/lov/2000-04-14-31
|National_Law_Name_3=Norwegian Regulation on personal data processing §2-7
|National_Law_Name_3=Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018
|National_Law_Link_3=https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2018-06-15-876
|National_Law_Link_3=https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-38/%C2%A720
|National_Law_Name_4=Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018
|National_Law_Link_4=https://lovdata.no/lov/2018-06-15-38/%C2%A714
|National_Law_Name_5=Norwegian Regulation on personal data processing §2-7
|National_Law_Link_5=https://lovdata.no/dokument/SF/forskrift/2018-06-15-876
|National_Law_Name_6=Norwegian Regulation on personal data processing Chapter III
|National_Law_Link_6=https://lovdata.no/dokument/LTI/forskrift/2000-12-15-1265
|National_Law_Name_7=
|National_Law_Link_7=
|National_Law_Name_8=
|National_Law_Link_8=


|Party_Name_1=Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service
|Party_Name_1=Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service
Line 40: Line 69:
|Party_Name_3=
|Party_Name_3=
|Party_Link_3=
|Party_Link_3=
|Party_Name_4=
|Party_Link_4=
|Party_Name_5=
|Party_Link_5=


|Appeal_To_Body=
|Appeal_To_Body=
Line 50: Line 75:
|Appeal_To_Link=
|Appeal_To_Link=


|Initial_Contributor=[https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=User:Riealeksandra Rie Aleksandra Walle]
|Initial_Contributor=Rie Aleksandra Walle
|
|
}}
}}


The Norwegian DPA has requested the Directorate of Correctional Service to establish records of processing activities, explain controller roles and responsibilities and document their internal controls.
After auditing the Norwegian Directorate of Correctional Service for 1,5 years, the DPA ordered them to sort out and document their controller responsibilities and update internal controls for managing privacy and personal data protection.


== English Summary ==
== English Summary ==


=== Facts ===
=== Facts ===
On their own initiative, the Norwegian DPA requested information from the Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service (DCS) regarding their processing of personal data, specifically an overview of such processing (equivalent to [[Article 30 GDPR|Article 30 GDPR]]) for purposes related to the Execution of Sentences Act, and details about the controller, the various processing activities in the correctional services, as well as a description of the roles and responsibilities internally.
In December 2020, the Norwegian DPA initiated an audit of the Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service (DCS, the controller) regarding their processing of personal data. The DPA first requested an overview of such processing (equivalent to [[Article 30 GDPR|Article 30 GDPR]]) for purposes related to the Norwegian Execution of Sentences Act, details about the controller, the various processing activities in the correctional services, as well as a description of the roles and responsibilities internally. This lead to a first decision issued in August 2021.


The DCS responded that they lack an overview of personal data processing activities, despite having procured a dedicated system for this purpose. They had initiated the work, but could only document ten processing activities - which are insufficient as per the GDPR, their own view. The DCS further stated that they process several - and many to a great extent - sensitive personal data related to sentencing. Consequently, it's important that the directorate has a good overview and control of personal data processing.
As a second step of the audit, the DPA notified the controller in November 2021 about forthcoming physical inspections at various sites. The inspections were conducted on the basis of the Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018 (which also implements the GDPR in Norway) § 20 for their responsibilities as controller and internal controls for managing privacy and personal data protection in the organization.


=== Holding ===
=== Holding ===
The DPA held that the Directorate of Correctional Service (DCS) must 1) establish records of processing activities in line with the Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2000 § 14 and the associated Regulation on personal data processing § 2-4, 2) describe how the responsibility for personal data processing is structured and distributed in the directorate, both organisationally and practically, cf. the Regulation on personal data processing § 2-7, and 3) send the DPA their internal controls documentation, cf. the Personal Data Act of 2000 § 14. Relevant documentation must be enclosed.
The DPA found several discrepancies relating to the controller's efforts on managing privacy and personal data protection in their organization. During the audit, the controller created an instruction to place their responsibilities throughout the whole organization. The DPA, however, noted that not all underlying organizational units shared the same understanding of this.
 
Further, the DPA noted that the internal control system was insuffienct and outdated, especially since the controller evidently registers very few violations of routines and regulations, likely as a result of lack of training and lack of a personal data security culture in the organization.
 
The DPA also stated that complex and confusing regulations might have lead to the lack of compliance. The Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018 and the GDPR do not apply to the processing of personal data related to sentencing, so the legislator continued the Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2000, with corresponding regulations. The legislator announced in 2018 a new law for the processing of inmates' personal data related to sentencing.
 
In conclusion, the DPA held that controller must sort out and document the responsibilities related to their role as controller, as well as review and update the internal control system for managing privacy and personal data protection in the organization.


== Comment ==
== Comment ==
Line 76: Line 107:


<pre>
<pre>
THE DIRECTOR OF THE CRIMINAL CARE
THE DIRECTOR OF THE CRIMINAL CARE
 
PO Box 694
PO Box 694
4302 SANDNES
4302 SANDNES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 




Their reference Our reference Date
Their reference Our reference Date
20 / 03293-53 24.06.2022


202105340 20 / 03293-13 26.08.2021


 
Submission of preliminary inspection report and notification of decision - Supervision of
 
prison care
Decision on order - Letter control with the Prison and Probation Service's processing of
personal information






     1 Introduction
     1 Introduction
The Danish Data Protection Agency refers to on-site inspections of the probation service on 9 November 2021, 4 April 2022,
April 6, 2022 and April 7, 2022. The inspection was carried out in accordance with


the Personal Data Act 2018 § 20.


We refer to our notification of a decision on an order, dated 28 June 2021. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service
The control concerned processing responsibility and internal control. The deviations from the regulations are closer
had a deadline to submit comments on the notice on 13 August 2021.
described in the attached control report. The control report covers the entire audit, from the opening of
 
 
We have not received any comments, and the decision is identical to the notification. For the record, we take
 
the same text as stated in the notice.
 
    2. Decision on order
 
 
The Data Inspectorate adopts the following order:
 
 
        1. In accordance with the Personal Data Act 2000 § 14 and
        associated regulations § 2-4 establish an overview of all the treatments of
 
        personal data made in the directorate.
 
        2. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service must account for how the responsibility for treatment follows
 
        The Personal Data Act is organizationally and practically located and distributed in
        the organization, cf. the Personal Data Regulations § 2-7. We request that applicable
        delegation documents are attached.
 
 
        3. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service must submit the current internal control to the agency,
 
        cf. the Personal Data Act 2000 § 14.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Postal address: Office address: Telephone: Org.nr: Homepage: 1
PO Box 458 Sentrum Trelastgata 3 22 39 69 00 974 761 467 www.datatilsynet.no
0105 OSLO 0191 OSLOOur legal basis for issuing orders is Article 58 no. 2 of the Privacy Ordinance. We refer to our
review of the legal order later in this letter.
 
The deadline for implementing the orders is September 21, 2021. By this deadline, you must
send us a written confirmation that the orders have been implemented. You must also send
the documents to which the orders apply.
 
 
    Background
 
3.1 The Data Inspectorate's requirements for reporting
 
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority decided on its own initiative to request information from
The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service on the Directorate's processing of personal data. In letter dated
On December 10, 2020, we requested the following:
 
 
- The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service has an overview of the processing of personal data
(corresponding processing protocol according to Article 30 of the Privacy Regulation and Directive
2016/680 article 24) which takes place in the Prison and Probation Service for purposes after
the Penal Code? If this is available, we ask that this be sent to us.
If this is not available, we ask for an explanation of why this is missing.
 
 
- Who is responsible for processing the various treatments that take place in the penal care?
Describe the responsibilities internally in the agency.
 
3.2 Summary of report from the Norwegian Prison and Probation Service
 
The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service writes in the report that as of today there is no central office
overview of processing of personal data in the directorate. The Directorate went to last year
purchase of a computer system (DraftIt) to be used to create a central overview. Directorate
 
present a draft based on the work in the system. This treatment protocol contains ten
treatment activities. The Directorate writes in the report that they do not consider this to be
an adequate overview of processing activities, as required by the privacy regulations.
 
In the report, the directorate emphasizes that many and in some cases very sensitive people are treated
personal data in connection with the execution of sentences. It is therefore important that
the directorate has a good overview and control. Furthermore, the directorate writes that one has happened
 
strengthening of resource input on ICT security.
 
    4. More about the requirements of the Personal Data Act
 
4.1 The Data Inspectorate's competence
 
The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service's processing of personal data after
 
Chapter 1A and 1B of the Execution of Sentences Act are still regulated by Act no. 31 of 14 April 2000
on the processing of personal data with associated regulations, cf. regulations on
transitional rules on the processing of personal data § 1 a. The Execution of Sentences Act
 
 
 
 
                                                                                              2 rules apply to the execution of prison sentences, etc., cf. section 1 of the Act.
Section 4c of the Execution of Sentences Act exhaustively states the purposes through which this can be achieved
processing of personal data in the Prison and Probation Service.
 
The Personal Data Act of 2018 § 20 third paragraph letter a states that the Data Inspectorate's authority
pursuant to Article 58 of the Privacy Regulation, the same applies to supervision of compliance with
provisions given in the Act here and in regulations issued pursuant to the Act.
 
 
The Data Inspectorate therefore finds that our competence to impose measures is stated in
the Personal Data Act 2018 § 20 third paragraph, cf. the Privacy Ordinance article 58 no. 2.
 
4.2 Requirements for treatment protocol
 
Pursuant to Article 30 of the Privacy Regulation (and Article 24 of Directive (EU) 2016/680)


the person responsible for treatment has a duty to have a treatment protocol.
letter control for on-site inspections of prisons and probation offices. The report describes
the observations made by the Norwegian Data Protection Authority during the audit, and include information collected
through documents and group interviews. The control report describes the Data Inspectorate


Corresponding duty to have an overview of the treatments that take place in one
assessments of compliance in penal care. Any objections to the descriptions of
the person responsible for processing follows from the Personal Data Act 2000 § 14 and associated regulations § 2-
factual matters must be addressed to the Norwegian Data Protection Authority in connection with the response to this notification.
4. Such an overview must be considered necessary in order to have a suitable system for internal control.


4.3 Requirements for internal control
    2. Notice of decision


This is a notice that the Data Inspectorate, pursuant to the Personal Data Act § 20, will take
decision on the following order:


Section 14 of the Personal Data Act and Chapter 3 of the Personal Data Regulations provide rules on
    1. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service must ensure that clear responsibilities and
internal control system. Pursuant to the Personal Data Act § 14 first paragraph, it shall
treatment managers «establish and maintain planned and systematic measures that are
necessary to meet the requirements of or pursuant to this Act, including ensuring
the quality of personal data ». A number of different measures may be relevant in this connection,
but a key part of internal control will often be to establish routines to fulfill the duties


and the rights under the law. The data controller must document the measures, and
        authority, cf. section 2-7 of the Personal Data Regulations. We refer to the report
the documentation must be available to employees of the data controller and
        Chapter 6.1.
at the data processor, as well as for the Data Inspectorate and the Privacy Board, cf. section 14, second paragraph.
    2. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service must conduct a review of the internal control system for


In accordance with the regulations § 3-1 first paragraph, the measures shall be adapted to the nature of the business, activities
        information security, and update this to ensure that the Personal Data Act becomes
and size, and special emphasis shall be placed on compliance with the requirements
        complied with in all sections of the agency, cf. the Personal Data Act 2000 § 14 and
information security in the Personal Data Act § 13. The requirements for measures are specified in
        Chapter 3 of the Personal Data Regulations. We refer to Chapter 6.2 of the report.


the regulations § 3-1 second paragraph, which requires that the person responsible for processing, among other things
ensure knowledge of current rules and adequate and up-to-date documentation
implementation of routines. The third paragraph, letters a to f, provides a non-exhaustive overview of
duties and rights the data controller must have routines for, including collection and
control of consent, assessment of the purpose of processing and fulfillment of the request for
insight and information.


The Prison and Probation Service is free to implement measures within the framework of the law. We will ask for one
feedback on the time of implementation of the orders. Furthermore, we will ask for one


4.4 Location of treatment responsibilities


The Execution of Sentences Act § 4e letter c states that the king gives regulations on who is
treatment manager.


Postal address: Office address: Telephone: Org.nr: Homepage:
PO Box 458 Sentrum Trelastgata 3 22 39 69 00 974 761 467 www.datatilsynet.no 1
0105 OSLO 0191 OSLO, feedback from the prison service on the implementation of the orders, with descriptions. See
more about this in point 4 of the notice.




    3. Legal basis
3.1 Current regulations for the processing of personal data in the penal care system
The Prison and Probation Service's processing of personal data is regulated in several different sets of rules.
Chapter 1A of the Execution of Sentences Act and the Personal Data Act of 2000 regulate


                                                                                                3In the preparatory work for the Execution of Sentences Act, Chapters 1a and 1b, the Ministry emphasizes that
processing of personal data about prisoners, convicts, etc. directly related to
it is especially important to regulate who has the responsibility for treatment. Furthermore, it follows:
sentencing and custody. The Personal Data Act of 2000 has otherwise been repealed, however
continued for the purpose of execution of sentence in § 1 of the regulations on transitional rules to
the Personal Data Act of 2018. The Ministry of Justice and Emergency Preparedness has notified a new law
based on Directive (EU) 2016/680.


        A key question is who should have the responsibility for treatment in the penal care.
        Pursuant to section 2 no. 4 of the Personal Data Act, the person responsible for processing is the one who decides
        the purpose of the processing of personal data and what kind of aid can
        used. The definition used by the Ministry in the draft § 4b, take nevertheless, as


        the submission of a new Police Register Act, based on the definition in the Privacy Directive in
For the processing of personal data in the Infoflyt system, separate rules laid down in apply
        instead of the corresponding definition in the Personal Data Act. It
Chapter 1B of the Execution of Sentences Act.
        The person responsible for treatment is after this defined as the one who by law or regulation
        determines the purpose of the treatment. When it comes to the background and the rationale for this
        position, one refers to Ot.prp.nr.108 (2008–2009) «On the Act on the processing of
        information in the police and the prosecuting authority (the Police Register Act) »pages 59-60.


All other processing of personal data, including administrative,


        When the purpose of the processing is determined by law, as the Ministry submits,
administrative and private law purposes, etc., are regulated in KDI's opinion by
        the main tasks of the person in charge of treatment will be to look after and relate to
the Personal Data Act of 2018, cf. Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
        ensure that the regulations for the treatment are followed. The treatment manager has for
        for example, the responsibility for safety and aids, for the treatment to be reported
        The Norwegian Data Protection Authority, and for the protection of the rights that the data subject has by virtue of the law, cf.
        Ot.prp.nr.108 (2008–2009) page 60.


3.2 Regulations to the Execution of Sentences Act, Chapter 1A
When the Execution of Sentences Act was amended in 2009, the legislature proposed further regulations


        The Norwegian Data Protection Authority points out that one best takes care of the processing responsibility by placing
of processing of personal data should be laid down in regulations. One regulation is given in
        responsibility in close connection with the treatment itself, and asks the ministry to reconsider
pursuant to section 4e of the Execution of Sentences Act.
        its position from the consultation note. The ministry is well on its way to
        views from the Data Inspectorate and believes that prison tenants and probation tenants should be
        treatment manager at the local level. But prison care treats
        personal information at several levels - both centrally, regionally and locally. Such


        the ministry sees it, should the specific location of the processing responsibility
The preparatory work for the Execution of Sentences Act § 4b states that the responsibility for processing pursuant to this
        regulated in regulations in the same way as for the police, see below. The question of
the provision could be shared between two data controllers. It appears further
        who is to be responsible for treatment in the penal care system will be considered
        in more detail when the regulations are to be prepared.




    5. The Data Inspectorate's assessment


        The specific division of tasks must be specified in regulations or
        guidelines. The daily responsibility for treatment - the practical
        implementation - can be delegated.


We further assume that the chief executive of the Norwegian Prison and Probation Service has
the processing responsibility for the processing of personal data in the agency.


The Norwegian Data Protection Authority finds that the Norwegian Prison and Probation Service has not presented a satisfactory report
Regulations on treatment responsibility in the penal care have not been issued by the Ministry.
overview of the directorate's processing of personal data.




The requirement for an overview of the treatments that are done in a company is fundamental to
3.3 Comments on the regulations
be able to comply with other obligations under the regulations. The Prison and Probation Service has not provided any
Prior to the audit, as well as along the way, references to various documents have appeared
justification for the lack of this central overview.
both different and incorrect regulations. Among other things, the Data Inspectorate has observed references to
the Personal Data Act of 2018 for processing that is still regulated by the 2000 Act


and Chapter 1A of the Execution of Sentences Act.








                                                                                                4There is also no documentation or description of the internal responsibilities in
1
agencies. The Directorate has only referred to its general right to delegate responsibilities in the steering line in
2Regulations on transitional rules on the processing of personal data, FOR-2018-06-15-877
agencies. This is considered to constitute a deviation from the requirements in the privacy regulations that are reproduced above.
Regulations on the processing of personal data in the penal care, FOR-2013-09-20-1099
As the directorate itself emphasizes in the report, the Prison and Probation Service processes large quantities
personal information. Among other things, many sensitive personal data are processed, including
special categories of personal data. Through what we have experienced through our treatment
of cases concerning the protection of the privacy regulations in the Prison and Probation Service, which


reports of breaches of personal data security, guidance requests and complaints from
inmates, we believe that there is reason to check the Prison and Probation Service's compliance
closer.


In order to investigate the Prison and Probation Service's compliance with the privacy regulations, it is
necessary for the Norwegian Data Protection Authority to be sent an overview of which treatments of
personal information made in the agency, see our notified order no. 1.


                                                                                              2, the Norwegian Data Protection Authority believes that there is reason to assume that a complex and motley set of rules has done so
difficult to understand which rules and laws apply, which has since become significant
compliance.


Furthermore, we find it necessary to receive an overview of how the treatment responsibility is exercised
The Data Inspectorate also believes that a lack of regulatory regulation of the processing responsibility has been given
in practice in the agency, see our notified order no. 2. This means that you must send us one
significance for compliance. The Ministry must bear part of the responsibility for partial deficiencies
overview of where and how responsibility for the processing of personal data, including
compliance with the privacy regulations of the agency. At the same time, it is clear from the preparatory work for
personal data security requirements, are delegated to the various units and subordinate agencies to
The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service.


Section 4 b of the Execution of Sentences Act states that the specific division of tasks must be determined in regulations
or guidelines. No regulations or guidelines have been prepared.


Finally, we also consider it appropriate and relevant to impose Correctional Care
During the consultation round for the amendments to the Execution of Sentences Act in 2009 noted
submit the overall documented internal control that applies to the agency's processing of
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority states that the term "daily processing responsibility" does not exist in the privacy regulations.
personal information. We refer to the requirements that follow from the Personal Data Act § 14, cf.
The legal responsibility must be placed. The Danish Data Protection Agency emphasizes that the responsibility cannot be delegated, i
associated regulations chapters 2 and 3.
as opposed to the tasks related to compliance with the treatment responsibility, which can be delegated.


The documentation you submit will form the basis for our assessment of any


further control of the agency's compliance with the privacy regulations.
If there are no clear instructions for processing personal data in
penal care, it could lead to differential treatment of prisoners' right to privacy.
Compliance with the regulations may differ from unit to unit. It is a
management responsibility to ensure a uniform understanding of the regulations in a composite organization.


     6. Concluding remarks
     4. Deadline for feedback


6.1 Coercive fine
If you have any comments on this notice or the attached inspection report, you must
send us a feedback on this. We ask that you send us a suggested date for when
you can close the discrepancies we describe in the control report. The Norwegian Data Protection Authority will take this into account
the proposal when we in our final decision set a deadline for when all deviations must be closed and
the decision implemented.


We will consider the use of a coercive fine if the orders have not been implemented by the deadline
(cf. the Personal Data Act § 29.)
6.2 Opportunity to appeal
You can appeal the decision. Any complaint must be sent to us within three weeks after this
the letter has been received (cf. the Public Administration Act §§ 28 and 29). If we maintain our decision will
we forward the case to the Privacy Board for complaint processing.
6.3 Transparency and publicity
You have the right to access the case documents (cf. the Public Administration Act § 18). We will also inform
that all documents are in principle public (cf. the Public Access to Information Act § 3.)
                                                                                              5If you believe there are grounds for exempting all or part of the document from public view
insight, we ask you to justify this.
If you have any questions, you can contact Embla Helle Nerland on telephone number 22
39 69 54.


We ask that you send us deadlines for closing deviations and any comments within 15.
August 2022. If it is documented that deviations have been closed within the deadline for feedback, will
we include this in the assessment when we make the final decision.


    5. Transparency and publicity
You have the right to access the case documents, cf. the Public Administration Act § 18. We will also inform
that all documents in the case are in principle public, cf. the Public Access to Information Act § 3.


If you have specific comments to the public about the documents, you can make them
these to the Danish Data Protection Agency.


With best regards
With best regards
Line 379: Line 265:


Camilla Nervik
Camilla Nervik
section chief
section chief
                                                              Embla Helle Nerland
                                                                    Embla Helle Nerland
 
                                                                    legal adviser
                                                              legal adviser


The document is electronically approved and therefore has no handwritten signatures
The document is electronically approved and therefore has no handwritten signatures
Copy to: THE DIRECTOR OF THE CRIME CARE CENTER, Per Ketil Andersen








                                                                                                3, Copy to: THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS


Attachments:


                                                                                          6
Control report from the Norwegian Data Protection Authority, dated 24 June 2022
</pre>
</pre>

Revision as of 05:41, 11 July 2022

Datatilsynet - 20/03293
LogoNO.png
Authority: Datatilsynet (Norway)
Jurisdiction: Norway
Relevant Law:
Norwegian Execution of Sentences Act Chapter 1A and 1B
Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2000
Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018
Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018
Norwegian Regulation on personal data processing §2-7
Norwegian Regulation on personal data processing Chapter III
Type: Investigation
Outcome: Violation Found
Started: 09.11.2021
Decided: 24.06.2022
Published: 07.07.2022
Fine: n/a
Parties: Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service
National Case Number/Name: 20/03293
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: n/a
Original Language(s): Norwegian
Norwegian
Original Source: Datatilsynet (in NO)
Preliminary inspection report (in NO)
Initial Contributor: Rie Aleksandra Walle

After auditing the Norwegian Directorate of Correctional Service for 1,5 years, the DPA ordered them to sort out and document their controller responsibilities and update internal controls for managing privacy and personal data protection.

English Summary

Facts

In December 2020, the Norwegian DPA initiated an audit of the Directorate of Norwegian Correctional Service (DCS, the controller) regarding their processing of personal data. The DPA first requested an overview of such processing (equivalent to Article 30 GDPR) for purposes related to the Norwegian Execution of Sentences Act, details about the controller, the various processing activities in the correctional services, as well as a description of the roles and responsibilities internally. This lead to a first decision issued in August 2021.

As a second step of the audit, the DPA notified the controller in November 2021 about forthcoming physical inspections at various sites. The inspections were conducted on the basis of the Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018 (which also implements the GDPR in Norway) § 20 for their responsibilities as controller and internal controls for managing privacy and personal data protection in the organization.

Holding

The DPA found several discrepancies relating to the controller's efforts on managing privacy and personal data protection in their organization. During the audit, the controller created an instruction to place their responsibilities throughout the whole organization. The DPA, however, noted that not all underlying organizational units shared the same understanding of this.

Further, the DPA noted that the internal control system was insuffienct and outdated, especially since the controller evidently registers very few violations of routines and regulations, likely as a result of lack of training and lack of a personal data security culture in the organization.

The DPA also stated that complex and confusing regulations might have lead to the lack of compliance. The Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2018 and the GDPR do not apply to the processing of personal data related to sentencing, so the legislator continued the Norwegian Personal Data Act of 2000, with corresponding regulations. The legislator announced in 2018 a new law for the processing of inmates' personal data related to sentencing.

In conclusion, the DPA held that controller must sort out and document the responsibilities related to their role as controller, as well as review and update the internal control system for managing privacy and personal data protection in the organization.

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

The decision below is a machine translation of the Norwegian original. Please refer to the Norwegian original for more details.

THE DIRECTOR OF THE CRIMINAL CARE
PO Box 694
4302 SANDNES


Their reference Our reference Date
20 / 03293-53 24.06.2022


Submission of preliminary inspection report and notification of decision - Supervision of
prison care



    1 Introduction
The Danish Data Protection Agency refers to on-site inspections of the probation service on 9 November 2021, 4 April 2022,
April 6, 2022 and April 7, 2022. The inspection was carried out in accordance with

the Personal Data Act 2018 § 20.

The control concerned processing responsibility and internal control. The deviations from the regulations are closer
described in the attached control report. The control report covers the entire audit, from the opening of

letter control for on-site inspections of prisons and probation offices. The report describes
the observations made by the Norwegian Data Protection Authority during the audit, and include information collected
through documents and group interviews. The control report describes the Data Inspectorate

assessments of compliance in penal care. Any objections to the descriptions of
factual matters must be addressed to the Norwegian Data Protection Authority in connection with the response to this notification.

    2. Notice of decision

This is a notice that the Data Inspectorate, pursuant to the Personal Data Act § 20, will take
decision on the following order:

    1. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service must ensure that clear responsibilities and

        authority, cf. section 2-7 of the Personal Data Regulations. We refer to the report
        Chapter 6.1.
    2. The Norwegian Prison and Probation Service must conduct a review of the internal control system for

        information security, and update this to ensure that the Personal Data Act becomes
        complied with in all sections of the agency, cf. the Personal Data Act 2000 § 14 and
        Chapter 3 of the Personal Data Regulations. We refer to Chapter 6.2 of the report.


The Prison and Probation Service is free to implement measures within the framework of the law. We will ask for one
feedback on the time of implementation of the orders. Furthermore, we will ask for one



Postal address: Office address: Telephone: Org.nr: Homepage:
PO Box 458 Sentrum Trelastgata 3 22 39 69 00 974 761 467 www.datatilsynet.no 1
0105 OSLO 0191 OSLO, feedback from the prison service on the implementation of the orders, with descriptions. See
more about this in point 4 of the notice.


    3. Legal basis
3.1 Current regulations for the processing of personal data in the penal care system
The Prison and Probation Service's processing of personal data is regulated in several different sets of rules.
Chapter 1A of the Execution of Sentences Act and the Personal Data Act of 2000 regulate

processing of personal data about prisoners, convicts, etc. directly related to
sentencing and custody. The Personal Data Act of 2000 has otherwise been repealed, however
continued for the purpose of execution of sentence in § 1 of the regulations on transitional rules to
the Personal Data Act of 2018. The Ministry of Justice and Emergency Preparedness has notified a new law
based on Directive (EU) 2016/680.


For the processing of personal data in the Infoflyt system, separate rules laid down in apply
Chapter 1B of the Execution of Sentences Act.

All other processing of personal data, including administrative,

administrative and private law purposes, etc., are regulated in KDI's opinion by
the Personal Data Act of 2018, cf. Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

3.2 Regulations to the Execution of Sentences Act, Chapter 1A
When the Execution of Sentences Act was amended in 2009, the legislature proposed further regulations

of processing of personal data should be laid down in regulations. One regulation is given in
pursuant to section 4e of the Execution of Sentences Act.

The preparatory work for the Execution of Sentences Act § 4b states that the responsibility for processing pursuant to this
the provision could be shared between two data controllers. It appears further



         The specific division of tasks must be specified in regulations or
         guidelines. The daily responsibility for treatment - the practical
         implementation - can be delegated.


Regulations on treatment responsibility in the penal care have not been issued by the Ministry.


3.3 Comments on the regulations
Prior to the audit, as well as along the way, references to various documents have appeared
both different and incorrect regulations. Among other things, the Data Inspectorate has observed references to
the Personal Data Act of 2018 for processing that is still regulated by the 2000 Act

and Chapter 1A of the Execution of Sentences Act.




1
2Regulations on transitional rules on the processing of personal data, FOR-2018-06-15-877
 Regulations on the processing of personal data in the penal care, FOR-2013-09-20-1099



                                                                                               2, the Norwegian Data Protection Authority believes that there is reason to assume that a complex and motley set of rules has done so
difficult to understand which rules and laws apply, which has since become significant
compliance.

The Data Inspectorate also believes that a lack of regulatory regulation of the processing responsibility has been given
significance for compliance. The Ministry must bear part of the responsibility for partial deficiencies
compliance with the privacy regulations of the agency. At the same time, it is clear from the preparatory work for

Section 4 b of the Execution of Sentences Act states that the specific division of tasks must be determined in regulations
or guidelines. No regulations or guidelines have been prepared.

During the consultation round for the amendments to the Execution of Sentences Act in 2009 noted
The Norwegian Data Protection Authority states that the term "daily processing responsibility" does not exist in the privacy regulations.
The legal responsibility must be placed. The Danish Data Protection Agency emphasizes that the responsibility cannot be delegated, i
as opposed to the tasks related to compliance with the treatment responsibility, which can be delegated.


If there are no clear instructions for processing personal data in
penal care, it could lead to differential treatment of prisoners' right to privacy.
Compliance with the regulations may differ from unit to unit. It is a
management responsibility to ensure a uniform understanding of the regulations in a composite organization.

    4. Deadline for feedback

If you have any comments on this notice or the attached inspection report, you must
send us a feedback on this. We ask that you send us a suggested date for when
you can close the discrepancies we describe in the control report. The Norwegian Data Protection Authority will take this into account
the proposal when we in our final decision set a deadline for when all deviations must be closed and
the decision implemented.


We ask that you send us deadlines for closing deviations and any comments within 15.
August 2022. If it is documented that deviations have been closed within the deadline for feedback, will
we include this in the assessment when we make the final decision.

    5. Transparency and publicity
You have the right to access the case documents, cf. the Public Administration Act § 18. We will also inform
that all documents in the case are in principle public, cf. the Public Access to Information Act § 3.

If you have specific comments to the public about the documents, you can make them
these to the Danish Data Protection Agency.

With best regards


Camilla Nervik

section chief
                                                                    Embla Helle Nerland
                                                                    legal adviser

The document is electronically approved and therefore has no handwritten signatures




                                                                                                 3, Copy to: THE MINISTRY OF JUSTICE AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

Attachments:

Control report from the Norwegian Data Protection Authority, dated 24 June 2022