HDPA (Greece) - 36/2019: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 25%; margin-left: 10px; float:right;"
{{DPAdecisionBOX
! colspan="2" |HDPA - 36/2019
 
|-
|Jurisdiction=Greece
| colspan="2" style="padding: 20px; background-color:#ffffff" |[[File:logoGR.jpg|center|250px]]
|DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff;
|-
|DPAlogo=LogoGR.jpg
|Authority:||[[HDPA (Greece)]]
|DPA_Abbrevation=HDPA (Greece)
[[Category:HDPA (Greece)]]
|DPA_With_Country=HDPA (Greece)
|-
 
|Jurisdiction:||[[Data Protection in Greece|Greece]]
|Case_Number_Name=36/2019
[[Category: Greece]]
|ECLI=
|-
 
|Relevant Law:||
|Original_Source_Name_1=HDPA (GR)
National data protection law prior to the GDPR
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.dpa.gr/portal/page?_pageid=33,15453&_dad=portal&_schema
|-
|Original_Source_Language_1=Greek
|Type:||Appeal before the HDPA
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=
|-
 
|Outcome:||Partly upheld
|Type=Complaint
|-
|Outcome=Partly upheld
|Decided:||07. 10. 2019
|Date_Started=
[[Category:2019]]
|Date_Decided=07.10.2019
|-
|Date_Published=
|Published:||n/a
|Year=2019
|-
|Fine=Reduced from 24,000 EUR to 22,000
|Fine:||Reduced from 24,000 EUR to 22,000 EUR
|Currency=EUR
|-
 
|Parties:||[http://www.forthnet.gr/Home.aspx?a_id=256 Forthnet]
|GDPR_Article_1=
|-
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=
|National Case Number:||36/2019
|GDPR_Article_2=
|-
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=
|European Case Law Identifier:||n/a
 
|-
|EU_Law_Name_1=
|Appeal:||n/a
|EU_Law_Link_1=
|-
|EU_Law_Name_2=
|Original Language:||[[Category:Greek]]
|EU_Law_Link_2=
Greek
 
|-
|National_Law_Name_1=Article 11 of L. 3471/2006 (law for the implementation of ePrivacy Directive)
|Original Source:||[https://www.dpa.gr/portal/page?_pageid=33,15453&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL HDPA (GR)]
|National_Law_Link_1=
|}
|National_Law_Name_2=Article 13 of L. 2472/1997 (former law on the protection of personal data)
|National_Law_Link_2=
 
|Party_Name_1=Forthnet
|Party_Link_1=http://www.forthnet.gr/Home.aspx?a_id=256
|Party_Name_2=
|Party_Link_2=
|Party_Name_3=
|Party_Link_3=
 
|Appeal_To_Body=
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name=
|Appeal_To_Status=
|Appeal_To_Link=
 
|Initial_Contributor=
|
}}


The HDPA re-examined complaints against the Greek internet and telecommunications service provider Forthnet.gr upon appeal and decided to reduce the fine it had previously imposed on it.  
The HDPA re-examined complaints against the Greek internet and telecommunications service provider Forthnet.gr upon appeal and decided to reduce the fine it had previously imposed on it.  


==English Summary==
==English Summary==
===Facts===
The HDPA had initially examined forty seven (47) complaints against Forthnet and upheld thirty four (34) of them. It fined the company EUR 24,000 for violation of Article 11 of L. 3471/2006 (law for the implementation of ePrivacy Directive)and Article 13 of L. 2472/1997 (former law on the protection of personal data). 
The company appealed before the HDPA to amend this decision, mainly claiming that the HDPA had violated the company's (as defendant) right to objection which is foreseen under the Greek administrative procedural code.
===Dispute===
===Holding===


The company appealed before the HDPA to amend decision imposing a fine of € 24.000 for violations of the national data protection law, which was in force prior to the GDPR. The HDPA accepted the company's claim that it had not effectively exercised its right to objection according to the Greek administrative procedural code and thus, the case should be examined again. Therefore, based on the new facts, the HDPA reduced the fine to 22.000.
The HDPA accepted the company's claim that it had not effectively exercised its right to objection as defendant, according to the Greek administrative procedural code and it, therefore, decided that the case should be examined again. Based on the new facts which arose after the company effectively exercised its right to objection, the HDPA reduced the fine to EUR 22,000.


==Comment==
==Comment==
Line 53: Line 80:
==English Machine Translation of the Decision==
==English Machine Translation of the Decision==


The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Greek original for more details.
There is no available machine translated decision. Please refer to the Greek original decision for details.


<pre>
<pre>
published decision AP. 36/2019
 


</pre>
</pre>

Latest revision as of 15:37, 6 December 2023

HDPA (Greece) - 36/2019
LogoGR.jpg
Authority: HDPA (Greece)
Jurisdiction: Greece
Relevant Law:
Article 11 of L. 3471/2006 (law for the implementation of ePrivacy Directive)
Article 13 of L. 2472/1997 (former law on the protection of personal data)
Type: Complaint
Outcome: Partly upheld
Started:
Decided: 07.10.2019
Published:
Fine: Reduced from 24,000 EUR to 22,000 EUR
Parties: Forthnet
National Case Number/Name: 36/2019
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: n/a
Original Language(s): Greek
Original Source: HDPA (GR) (in )
Initial Contributor: n/a

The HDPA re-examined complaints against the Greek internet and telecommunications service provider Forthnet.gr upon appeal and decided to reduce the fine it had previously imposed on it.

English Summary

Facts

The HDPA had initially examined forty seven (47) complaints against Forthnet and upheld thirty four (34) of them. It fined the company EUR 24,000 for violation of Article 11 of L. 3471/2006 (law for the implementation of ePrivacy Directive)and Article 13 of L. 2472/1997 (former law on the protection of personal data).

The company appealed before the HDPA to amend this decision, mainly claiming that the HDPA had violated the company's (as defendant) right to objection which is foreseen under the Greek administrative procedural code.

Dispute

Holding

The HDPA accepted the company's claim that it had not effectively exercised its right to objection as defendant, according to the Greek administrative procedural code and it, therefore, decided that the case should be examined again. Based on the new facts which arose after the company effectively exercised its right to objection, the HDPA reduced the fine to EUR 22,000.

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

There is no available machine translated decision. Please refer to the Greek original decision for details.