HDPA (Greece) - 39/2019: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Ar moved page HDPA - 39/2019 to HDPA (Greece) - 39/2019) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | {{DPAdecisionBOX | ||
|Jurisdiction=Greece | |||
|DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff; | |||
|- | |DPAlogo=LogoGR.jpg | ||
|DPA_Abbrevation=HDPA (Greece) | |||
| | |DPA_With_Country=HDPA (Greece) | ||
| | |||
| | |||
| | |Case_Number_Name=39/2019 | ||
|ECLI= | |||
|Original_Source_Name_1=HDPA | |||
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.dpa.gr/portal/page?_pageid=33%2C15453&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL&_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos=2019&_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.arithmosApofasis=&_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.thematikiEnotita=-1&_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.ananeosi=%CE%91%CE%BD%CE%B1%CE%BD%CE%AD%CF%89%CF%83%CE%B7 | |||
|Original_Source_Language_1=Greek | |||
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=EL | |||
|Original_Source_Name_2= | |||
| | |Original_Source_Link_2= | ||
|Original_Source_Language_2= | |||
| | |Original_Source_Language__Code_2= | ||
| | |||
|Type=Other | |||
|Outcome=Rejected | |||
|Date_Started= | |||
|Date_Decided=25.10.2019 | |||
|Date_Published= | |||
|} | |Year=2019 | ||
|Fine=None | |||
|Currency= | |||
|GDPR_Article_1=Article 15 GDPR | |||
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 15 GDPR | |||
|GDPR_Article_2=Article 21 GDPR | |||
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=Article 21 GDPR | |||
|GDPR_Article_3= | |||
|GDPR_Article_Link_3= | |||
|GDPR_Article_4= | |||
|GDPR_Article_Link_4= | |||
|EU_Law_Name_1= | |||
|EU_Law_Link_1= | |||
|EU_Law_Name_2= | |||
|EU_Law_Link_2= | |||
|National_Law_Name_1= | |||
|National_Law_Link_1= | |||
|National_Law_Name_2= | |||
|National_Law_Link_2= | |||
|Party_Name_1=Ergasias S.A | |||
|Party_Link_1=https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/EUROB:GA | |||
|Party_Name_2= | |||
|Party_Link_2= | |||
|Party_Name_3= | |||
|Party_Link_3= | |||
|Appeal_To_Body= | |||
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name= | |||
|Appeal_To_Status= | |||
|Appeal_To_Link= | |||
|Initial_Contributor= | |||
| | |||
}} | |||
The HDPA rejected appeal filed by the Greek bank Eurobank Ergasias S.A. against HDPA's older decision linked to the exercise of the right to access and right to object under GDPR. | The HDPA rejected appeal filed by the Greek bank Eurobank Ergasias S.A. against HDPA's older decision linked to the exercise of the right to access and right to object under GDPR. |
Latest revision as of 15:38, 6 December 2023
HDPA (Greece) - 39/2019 | |
---|---|
Authority: | HDPA (Greece) |
Jurisdiction: | Greece |
Relevant Law: | Article 15 GDPR Article 21 GDPR |
Type: | Other |
Outcome: | Rejected |
Started: | |
Decided: | 25.10.2019 |
Published: | |
Fine: | None |
Parties: | Ergasias S.A |
National Case Number/Name: | 39/2019 |
European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
Appeal: | n/a |
Original Language(s): | Greek |
Original Source: | HDPA (in EL) |
Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The HDPA rejected appeal filed by the Greek bank Eurobank Ergasias S.A. against HDPA's older decision linked to the exercise of the right to access and right to object under GDPR.
English Summary
Facts
The Greek bank Eurobank Ergasias S.A. appealed before the HDPA to challenge HDPA's older decision. The appealed decision provided advises on what measures the Bank should have taken to properly respond to a data subject's access request and to guarantee the exercise of the right to object. The Bank claimed that the appealed decision imposed disproportionate obligations on it and on other creditors violating the former national data protection law and the law on the establishment of debtor notification companies.
Dispute
The issue at stake was mainly the determination of the period within which the Bank had to notify the personal data to the data subjects, in order for the debtors to be able to exercise their rights to access and to object. The appealed decision recommended that the Bank provide the debtors with a reasonable period of 10-15 days starting from the notification of the debtors until the Bank distributes their personal data to the debtor notification companies.
Holding
The HDPA ruled that there is no ground for re-examination of this case. Thus, it rejected the appeal.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
There is no available machine translated decision. Please refer to the Greek original decision for details.