BfDI (Germany) - 11.02.2021: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Ar moved page BfDI (Germany) - mivolta GmbH to BfDI (Germany) - 11.02.2021) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) fined the energy provider mivolta GmbH for telephone advertising without permission. | The German Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) fined the energy provider mivolta GmbH €250,000 for violating Article 6 GDPR by telephone advertising without permission. | ||
==English Summary== | ==English Summary== |
Latest revision as of 16:41, 12 December 2023
BfDI - mivolta GmbH | |
---|---|
Authority: | BfDI (Germany) |
Jurisdiction: | Germany |
Relevant Law: | Article 6 GDPR Article 21 GDPR Article 16 Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications § 102 (2) TKG § 20 UWG § 7 UWG § 149 (1) Nr. 17 (e) TKG |
Type: | Complaint |
Outcome: | Upheld |
Started: | |
Decided: | |
Published: | 11.02.2021 |
Fine: | 250000 EUR |
Parties: | n/a |
National Case Number/Name: | mivolta GmbH |
European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
Appeal: | Unknown |
Original Language(s): | German |
Original Source: | bundesnetzagentur.de (in DE) |
Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The German Federal Network Agency (Bundesnetzagentur) fined the energy provider mivolta GmbH €250,000 for violating Article 6 GDPR by telephone advertising without permission.
English Summary
Facts
The company mivolta GmbH used partners to call hundreds of consumers to make telephone advertising for supply agreements (electricity and gas) of his own product. Thereby the telephoners also acted without and against the consumers wishes. Partially the telephoners used a hidden telephone number. In some cases the telephoners told the consumers that they are from the consumers electricity provider to get necessary data to be able to initiate a change of the provider. So the consumers had to make revocations of contracts they never concluded.
Dispute
Holding
The President of the Bundesnetzagentur Jochen Homann held that it is not acceptable that consumers are concerned that way by impermissible telephone advertising and supposed conclusions of a contract.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.