AEPD (Spain) - PS/00098/2019: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX <!--Information about the DPA--> |Jurisdiction=Spain |DPA-BG-Color=#ffffff; |DPAlogo=logoES.jpg |DPA_Abbrevation=AEPD |DPA_With_Country=AEPD (Spain) <!--Inf...") |
m (Ar moved page AEPD - PS/00098/2019 to AEPD (Spain) - PS/00098/2019) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<!--Information about the decision--> | <!--Information about the decision--> | ||
|Case_Number_Name=PS/ | |Case_Number_Name=PS/00098/2019 | ||
|ECLI=n/a | |ECLI=n/a | ||
|Original_Source_Name_1=AEPD | |Original_Source_Name_1=AEPD | ||
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.aepd.es/es/documento/ps- | |Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.aepd.es/es/documento/ps-00098-2019.pdf | ||
|Original_Source_Language_1=Spanish | |Original_Source_Language_1=Spanish | ||
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=es | |Original_Source_Language__Code_1=es | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|Outcome=Upheld | |Outcome=Upheld | ||
|Date_Decided=n/a | |Date_Decided=n/a | ||
|Date_Published= | |Date_Published=25. 2.2020 | ||
|Year=2020 | |Year=2020 | ||
|Fine= | |Fine=none | ||
|Currency= | |Currency= | ||
<!--Information about the applied law--> | <!--Information about the applied law--> | ||
|GDPR_Article_1=Article | |GDPR_Article_1=Article 13 GDPR | ||
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article | |GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 13 GDPR | ||
|GDPR_Article_2= | |GDPR_Article_2= | ||
|GDPR_Article_Link_2= | |GDPR_Article_Link_2= | ||
|GDPR_Article_3= | |GDPR_Article_3= | ||
|GDPR_Article_Link_3= | |GDPR_Article_Link_3= | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
|GDPR_Article_Link_20= | |GDPR_Article_Link_20= | ||
|Party_Name_1=Anoymous | |Party_Name_1=Anoymous | ||
|Party_Link_1= | |Party_Link_1= | ||
|Party_Name_2= | |Party_Name_2=Vs. DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE LA GUARDIA CIVI | ||
|Party_Link_2= | |Party_Link_2= | ||
|Party_Name_3= | |Party_Name_3= | ||
| Line 83: | Line 83: | ||
|Party_Link_5= | |Party_Link_5= | ||
<!--Information about a possible appeal--> | |||
| n/a}} | |Appeal_To_Body=n/a | ||
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name= | |||
|Appeal_To_Status= | |||
|Appeal_To_Link= | |||
| | |||
}} | |||
The | The AEPD issued a reprimand to the Directorate-General of the Spanish Civil Guard for a lack of transparency. The data controller did not provide information to the data subjects who filled out the travel permit form with their personal data, as required by Article 13 GDPR. | ||
==English Summary== | ==English Summary== | ||
===Facts=== | ===Facts=== | ||
A citizen | A citizen had to give his personal details, as well as his daughter’s personal details when filling the official form aimed at authorizing underage children travelling (“travel permit”) provided by the Directorate-General of the Spanish Civil Guard. While completing the travel permit with the personal data required, the citizen noticed that no information was given regarding the collection of personal data, and the purposes of the processing, or about the recipients. The citizen – the complainant – filed a complaint with the AEPD claiming the unlawfulness due to the lack of information concerning personal data required, under Article 13 GDPR. | ||
===Dispute=== | ===Dispute=== | ||
Does the | Does the travel permit form provide for the mandatory information, as foreseen by Article 13 GDPR? | ||
===Holding=== | ===Holding=== | ||
The AEPD ruled that the | The AEPD ruled that the form used to allow underage children travelling did not provide the mandatory information, as required by Article 13 GDPR. | ||
As a consequence, the AEPD issued a reprimand to the Directorate-General of the Spanish Civil Guard for the violation of Article 13 GDPR. | |||
==Comment== | ==Comment== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:59, 13 December 2023
| AEPD - PS/00098/2019 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | AEPD (Spain) |
| Jurisdiction: | Spain |
| Relevant Law: | Article 13 GDPR |
| Type: | Complaint |
| Outcome: | Upheld |
| Started: | |
| Decided: | n/a |
| Published: | 25. 2.2020 |
| Fine: | none |
| Parties: | Anoymous Vs. DIRECCIÓN GENERAL DE LA GUARDIA CIVI |
| National Case Number/Name: | PS/00098/2019 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | n/a |
| Original Language(s): | Spanish |
| Original Source: | AEPD (in es) |
| Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The AEPD issued a reprimand to the Directorate-General of the Spanish Civil Guard for a lack of transparency. The data controller did not provide information to the data subjects who filled out the travel permit form with their personal data, as required by Article 13 GDPR.
English Summary
Facts
A citizen had to give his personal details, as well as his daughter’s personal details when filling the official form aimed at authorizing underage children travelling (“travel permit”) provided by the Directorate-General of the Spanish Civil Guard. While completing the travel permit with the personal data required, the citizen noticed that no information was given regarding the collection of personal data, and the purposes of the processing, or about the recipients. The citizen – the complainant – filed a complaint with the AEPD claiming the unlawfulness due to the lack of information concerning personal data required, under Article 13 GDPR.
Dispute
Does the travel permit form provide for the mandatory information, as foreseen by Article 13 GDPR?
Holding
The AEPD ruled that the form used to allow underage children travelling did not provide the mandatory information, as required by Article 13 GDPR.
As a consequence, the AEPD issued a reprimand to the Directorate-General of the Spanish Civil Guard for the violation of Article 13 GDPR.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the **Spanish** original. Please refer to the **Spanish** original for more details.
to be completed
