HDPA (Greece) - 24/2023: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(Updated broken link) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|Original_Source_Name_1=Hellenic Data Protection Authority | |Original_Source_Name_1=Hellenic Data Protection Authority | ||
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.dpa.gr/ | |Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.dpa.gr/el/enimerwtiko/prakseisArxis/apostoli-proothitikon-minymaton-e-mail-horis-proigoymeni-sygkatathesi | ||
|Original_Source_Language_1=Greek | |Original_Source_Language_1=Greek | ||
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=EL | |Original_Source_Language__Code_1=EL | ||
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
}} | }} | ||
After the data subject had withdrawn a complaint, the Hellenic DPA continued with an ex officio investigation into the sending of unauthorized advertising messages and issued a reprimand on the controller for violation of [[Article 5 GDPR# | After the data subject had withdrawn a complaint, the Hellenic DPA continued with an ex officio investigation into the sending of unauthorized advertising messages and issued a reprimand on the controller for violation of [[Article 5 GDPR#1a|Article 5(1)(a) GDPR]]. | ||
== English Summary == | == English Summary == | ||
=== Facts === | === Facts === | ||
The data subject, a pharmacist, received several emails advertising pharmaceutical products from the company Infinity Pack, the controller. The data subject filed a complaint with the Hellenic DPA, claiming that they had agreed to receive promotional content at some personal email addresses. However, they stated that they never had any commercial relationship with the controller through that other specific email, which was used exclusively for communications with | The data subject, a pharmacist, received several emails advertising pharmaceutical products from the company Infinity Pack, the controller. The data subject filed a complaint with the Hellenic DPA, claiming that they had agreed to receive promotional content at some personal email addresses. However, they stated that they never had any commercial relationship with the controller through that other specific email, which was used exclusively for communications with public bodies. | ||
The DPA notified the controller asking for clarifications on how it became aware of that specific email address. The controller responded that it could not determine the source of the information, but admitted that its representatives travel to many regions in Greece and collect 'market information' such as business cards and contact details of potential clients. | The DPA notified the controller asking for clarifications on how it became aware of that specific email address. The controller responded that it could not determine the source of the information, but admitted that its representatives travel to many regions in Greece and collect 'market information' such as business cards and contact details of potential clients. | ||
Although the data subject withdrew the claim during the course of the procedure, the | Although the data subject withdrew the claim during the course of the procedure, the Hellenic DPA decided to continue with ex officio investigations. | ||
=== Holding === | === Holding === | ||
The DPA highlighted that [[Article 5 GDPR#1|Article 5(1) GDPR]] establishes that personal data must be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner, while also being collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes. Moreover, [[Article 5 GDPR#2|Article 5(2)]] provides that the controller is responsible for demonstrating compliance with these obligations. | The DPA highlighted that [[Article 5 GDPR#1|Article 5(1) GDPR]] establishes that personal data must be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner, while also being collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes. Moreover, [[Article 5 GDPR#2|Article 5(2)]] provides that the controller is responsible for demonstrating compliance with these obligations. | ||
The DPA then reffered to the | The DPA then reffered to the Greek national law. It clarified that, although the law authorizes controllers to send advertising messages to emails legally obtained in the context of their commercial transactions, even without prior consent, it requires that an easy way to object the data processing be made available. | ||
In the case under analysis, the DPA held that the controller was not able to demonstrate the source of the data and, therefore, cannot claim that they were obtained in the context of its commercial activities. Similarly, the controller did not | In the case under analysis, the DPA held that the controller was not able to demonstrate the source of the data and, therefore, cannot claim that they were obtained in the context of its commercial activities. Similarly, the controller did not demonstrate that it had obtained the consent of the data subject. | ||
For these reasons, DPA found a violation of [[Article 5 GDPR#1a|Article 5(1)(a) GDPR]]. However, taking into account the fact that the complaint was of an individual nature and that no other violations were found, as well well as the fact that the controller , soon after being notified, adjusted its conduct, the DPA only issued a reprimand. | For these reasons, DPA found a violation of [[Article 5 GDPR#1a|Article 5(1)(a) GDPR]]. However, taking into account the fact that the complaint was of an individual nature and that no other violations were found, as well well as the fact that the controller , soon after being notified, adjusted its conduct, the DPA only issued a reprimand. | ||
Latest revision as of 05:43, 30 October 2023
| HDPA - 24/2023 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | HDPA (Greece) |
| Jurisdiction: | Greece |
| Relevant Law: | Article 5(1) GDPR |
| Type: | Complaint |
| Outcome: | Upheld |
| Started: | 23.06.2021 |
| Decided: | 28.06.2022 |
| Published: | |
| Fine: | n/a |
| Parties: | Infinity Pack |
| National Case Number/Name: | 24/2023 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | Unknown |
| Original Language(s): | Greek |
| Original Source: | Hellenic Data Protection Authority (in EL) |
| Initial Contributor: | Bernardo Armentano |
After the data subject had withdrawn a complaint, the Hellenic DPA continued with an ex officio investigation into the sending of unauthorized advertising messages and issued a reprimand on the controller for violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR.
English Summary
Facts
The data subject, a pharmacist, received several emails advertising pharmaceutical products from the company Infinity Pack, the controller. The data subject filed a complaint with the Hellenic DPA, claiming that they had agreed to receive promotional content at some personal email addresses. However, they stated that they never had any commercial relationship with the controller through that other specific email, which was used exclusively for communications with public bodies.
The DPA notified the controller asking for clarifications on how it became aware of that specific email address. The controller responded that it could not determine the source of the information, but admitted that its representatives travel to many regions in Greece and collect 'market information' such as business cards and contact details of potential clients.
Although the data subject withdrew the claim during the course of the procedure, the Hellenic DPA decided to continue with ex officio investigations.
Holding
The DPA highlighted that Article 5(1) GDPR establishes that personal data must be processed lawfully, fairly and in a transparent manner, while also being collected for specified, explicit and legitimate purposes. Moreover, Article 5(2) provides that the controller is responsible for demonstrating compliance with these obligations.
The DPA then reffered to the Greek national law. It clarified that, although the law authorizes controllers to send advertising messages to emails legally obtained in the context of their commercial transactions, even without prior consent, it requires that an easy way to object the data processing be made available.
In the case under analysis, the DPA held that the controller was not able to demonstrate the source of the data and, therefore, cannot claim that they were obtained in the context of its commercial activities. Similarly, the controller did not demonstrate that it had obtained the consent of the data subject.
For these reasons, DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. However, taking into account the fact that the complaint was of an individual nature and that no other violations were found, as well well as the fact that the controller , soon after being notified, adjusted its conduct, the DPA only issued a reprimand.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the Greek original. Please refer to the Greek original for more details.
