NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH/2019/5112/15: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Ar moved page NAIH - NAIH/2019/5112/15 to NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH/2019/5112/15) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{ | {{DPAdecisionBOX | ||
|Jurisdiction=Hungary | |||
|DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#7f0037; | |||
|DPAlogo=LogoHU.jpg | |||
|DPA_Abbrevation=NAIH (Hungary) | |||
|DPA_With_Country=NAIH (Hungary) | |||
|Case_Number_Name=NAIH/2019/5112/15 | |||
|ECLI= | |||
| | |Original_Source_Name_1=NAIH | ||
| | |Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.naih.hu/files/NAIH-2019-5112-hatarozat.pdf | ||
| | |Original_Source_Language_1=Hungarian | ||
| | |Original_Source_Language__Code_1=HU | ||
| | |Original_Source_Name_2= | ||
| | |Original_Source_Link_2= | ||
|Original_Source_Language_2= | |||
| | |Original_Source_Language__Code_2= | ||
| | |||
| | |Type=Complaint | ||
| | |Outcome=Upheld | ||
| | |Date_Started= | ||
| | |Date_Decided=18.11.2019 | ||
| | |Date_Published= | ||
| | |Year=2019 | ||
| | |Fine=None | ||
| | |Currency= | ||
| | |||
| | |GDPR_Article_1=Article 5(1)(d) GDPR | ||
| | |GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 5 GDPR#1d | ||
| | |GDPR_Article_2=Article 12(3) GDPR | ||
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=Article 12 GDPR#3 | |||
| | |GDPR_Article_3=Article 15 GDPR | ||
| | |GDPR_Article_Link_3=Article 15 GDPR | ||
|GDPR_Article_4= | |||
|GDPR_Article_Link_4= | |||
|GDPR_Article_5= | |||
|GDPR_Article_Link_5= | |||
|EU_Law_Name_1= | |||
|EU_Law_Link_1= | |||
|EU_Law_Name_2= | |||
|EU_Law_Link_2= | |||
|National_Law_Name_1= | |||
|National_Law_Link_1= | |||
|National_Law_Name_2= | |||
|National_Law_Link_2= | |||
|Party_Name_1=Hospital | |||
|Party_Link_1= | |||
|Party_Name_2= | |||
|Party_Link_2= | |||
|Party_Name_3= | |||
|Party_Link_3= | |||
|Appeal_To_Body= | |||
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name= | |||
|Appeal_To_Status= | |||
|Appeal_To_Link= | |||
|Initial_Contributor= | |||
| | |||
}} | |||
The NAIH confirmed that the exercice of the access right and the accuracy principle do not require to provide certified copies to the data subject. | The NAIH confirmed that the exercice of the access right and the accuracy principle do not require to provide certified copies to the data subject. | ||
| Line 66: | Line 86: | ||
==English Machine Translation of the Decision== | ==English Machine Translation of the Decision== | ||
The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the | The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Hungarian original for more details. | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
to be completed.. | to be completed.. | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
Latest revision as of 10:10, 17 November 2023
| NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH/2019/5112/15 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | NAIH (Hungary) |
| Jurisdiction: | Hungary |
| Relevant Law: | Article 5(1)(d) GDPR Article 12(3) GDPR Article 15 GDPR |
| Type: | Complaint |
| Outcome: | Upheld |
| Started: | |
| Decided: | 18.11.2019 |
| Published: | |
| Fine: | None |
| Parties: | Hospital |
| National Case Number/Name: | NAIH/2019/5112/15 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | n/a |
| Original Language(s): | Hungarian |
| Original Source: | NAIH (in HU) |
| Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The NAIH confirmed that the exercice of the access right and the accuracy principle do not require to provide certified copies to the data subject.
English Summary
Facts
The applicant is a citizen who originally filed a complaint against the Hospital regarding the medical treatment he was subject to. During the investigations concerning the Hospital, the applicant requested a copy of his personal data. The hospital charged the applicant with a fee and sent a copy of the documents requested with undue delay and without certification. As a consequence, the applicant filed a complaint with the NAIH for violation of his access right.
Dispute
Could a data subect be granted of a certified copiy of his personal data under Article 15 GDPR?
Holding
The NAIH found that the data controller has failed to grant the Applicant ‘s right of access within the thirty-days limit, as required by Article 12(3). However, it rejected the applicant’s claims regarding the certified copies requested under Article 15 read in conjunction with Article 5(1)(d) GDPR. Indeed, the DPA found that these articles do not require to provide for certified copies of personal data.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Hungarian original for more details.
to be completed..
