HDPA (Greece) - 41/2019: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 25%; margin-left: 10px; float:right;"
{{DPAdecisionBOX
! colspan="2" |HDPA - 43/2019
|-
| colspan="2" style="padding: 20px; background-color:#ffffff" |[[File:logoGR.jpg|center|250px]]
|-
|Authority:||[[HDPA (Greece)]]
[[Category:HDPA (Greece)]]
|-
|Jurisdiction:||[[Data Protection in Greece|Greece]]
[[Category: Greece]]
|-
|Relevant Law:||[[Article 12 GDPR#3|Article 12(3) GDPR]]
[[Category:Article 12(3) GDPR]]


[[Article 12 GDPR#4|Article 12(4) GDPR]]
|Jurisdiction=Greece
[[Category:Article 12(4) GDPR]]
|DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff;
|DPAlogo=LogoGR.jpg
|DPA_Abbrevation=HDPA (Greece)
|DPA_With_Country=HDPA (Greece)


[[Article 15 GDPR#1|Article 15(1) GDPR]]
|Case_Number_Name=43/2019
[[Category:Article 15(1) GDPR]]
|ECLI=


[[Article 15 GDPR#3|Article 15(3) GDPR]]
|Original_Source_Name_1=HDPA
[[Category:Article 15(3) GDPR]]
|Original_Source_Link_1=https://www.dpa.gr/portal/page?_pageid=33,15453&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
|Original_Source_Language_1=Greek
|Original_Source_Language__Code_1=EL
|Original_Source_Name_2=
|Original_Source_Link_2=
|Original_Source_Language_2=
|Original_Source_Language__Code_2=


[[Article 16 GDPR]]
|Type=Complaint
[[Category:Article 16 GDPR]]
|Outcome=Upheld
|-
|Date_Started=
|Type:||Complaint
|Date_Decided=11.12.2019
|-
|Date_Published=
|Outcome:||Upheld
|Year=2019
|-
|Fine=None
|Decided:||11.12.2019
|Currency=
[[Category:2019]]
|-
|Published:||n/a
|-
|Fine:||None
|-
|Parties:||n/a
|-
|National Case Number:||43/2019
|-
|European Case Law Identifier:||n/a
|-
|Appeal:||n/a
|-
|Original Language:||[[Category:Greek]]
Greek
|-
|Original Source:||[https://www.dpa.gr/portal/page?_pageid=33,15453&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL HDPA (GR)]
|}


The HDPA issued a reprimand to the Ministry of Mercantile Marine and Island Policy for the infringement of the right of access.
|GDPR_Article_1=Article 12(3) GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_1=Article 12 GDPR#3
|GDPR_Article_2=Article 12(4) GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_2=Article 12 GDPR#4
|GDPR_Article_3=Article 15(1) GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_3=Article 15 GDPR#1
|GDPR_Article_4=Article 15(3) GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_4=Article 15 GDPR#3
|GDPR_Article_5=Article 16 GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_5=Article 16 GDPR
|GDPR_Article_6=Article 58(2)(b) GDPR
|GDPR_Article_Link_6=Article 58 GDPR#2b
|GDPR_Article_7=
|GDPR_Article_Link_7=
|GDPR_Article_8=
|GDPR_Article_Link_8=
 
|EU_Law_Name_1=
|EU_Law_Link_1=
|EU_Law_Name_2=
|EU_Law_Link_2=
 
|National_Law_Name_1=
|National_Law_Link_1=
|National_Law_Name_2=
|National_Law_Link_2=
 
|Party_Name_1=
|Party_Link_1=
|Party_Name_2=
|Party_Link_2=
 
|Appeal_To_Body=
|Appeal_To_Case_Number_Name=
|Appeal_To_Status=
|Appeal_To_Link=
 
|Initial_Contributor=
|
}}
 
The HDPA issued a reprimand to the Ministry of Mercantile Marine and Island Policy for infringement of the right of access.


==English Summary==
==English Summary==
===Facts===
===Facts===
The Complainant was an employee at the Hellenic Ministry of Mercantile Marine and Island Policy and she claimed that the Ministry violated her right of access according to Article 15 GDPR and her right of rectification according to Article 16 GDPR. She was candidate for an executive position within the Ministry and asked via e-mail that all candidates are provided with the right of objection and the right for an internal administrative appeal. The Head of the Department replied to her that there was no right to objection in this phase and that all candidates have been treated equally. It also noted that the ranking lists of the candidates contain personal data and there is no legal obligation to publish them.   
The Complainant was an employee at the Hellenic Ministry of Mercantile Marine and Island Policy and she claimed that the Ministry violated her right of access according to [[Article 15 GDPR|Article 15 GDPR]] and her right of rectification according to [[Article 16 GDPR|Article 16 GDPR]]. She was candidate for an executive position within the Ministry and asked via e-mail that all candidates are provided with the right of objection and the right for an internal administrative appeal. The Head of the Department replied to her that there was no right to objection in this phase and that all candidates have been treated equally. It also noted that the ranking lists of the candidates contain personal data and there is no legal obligation to publish them.   


===Dispute===
===Dispute===
Line 60: Line 79:


===Holding===
===Holding===
The ranking lists of the candidates contain personal data and there is no legal obligation to publish them. The HDPA invoked the obligations of the data controllers according to Article 12 (3) and (4) GDPR when a data subject may exercise their right of access according to Article 15 (1) and (3) GDPR. Then, it explained that the rights of objection and to internal administrative appeal under public administrative law constitute different legal bases and imply different legal consequences from the right to rectification under Article 16 GDPR. Thus, the data subject can’t exercise them by exercising the right to rectification under Article 16 GDPR. Finally, the DPA issued a reprimand to the Ministry according to Article 58 (2)(b) GDPR for the infringement of Articles 12 and 15 GDPR.  
The ranking lists of the candidates contain personal data and there is no legal obligation to publish them. The HDPA invoked the obligations of the data controllers according to [[Article 12 GDPR#3|Article 12(3) GDPR]] and [[Article 12 GDPR#4|Article 12(4) GDPR]] when a data subject may exercise their right of access according to [[Article 15 GDPR#1|Article 15(1) GDPR]] and [[Article 15 GDPR#3|Article 15(3) GDPR]]. Then, it explained that the right of objection and the right to internal administrative appeal under public administrative law constitute different legal bases and imply different legal consequences from the right to rectification under [[Article 16 GDPR|Article 16 GDPR]]. Thus, the data subject can’t exercise them by exercising the right to rectification under [[Article 16 GDPR|Article 16 GDPR]]. Finally, the HDPA issued a reprimand to the Ministry according to [[Article 58 GDPR#2b|Article 58(2)(b) GDPR]] for the infringement of [[Article 12 GDPR|Article 12 GDPR]] and [[Article 15 GDPR|Article 15 GDPR]].
 


==Comment==
==Comment==
Line 68: Line 86:


==Further Resources==
==Further Resources==
''Share blogs or news articles here!''
''Share blogs or news articles here!''


==English Machine Translation of the Decision==
==English Machine Translation of the Decision==


The decision below is a machine translation of the original. Please refer to the Greek original for more details.
There is no available machine translated decision. Please refer to the Greek original decision for details.


<pre>
<pre>
published decision AP. 43/2019
 


</pre>
</pre>

Latest revision as of 15:39, 6 December 2023

HDPA (Greece) - 43/2019
LogoGR.jpg
Authority: HDPA (Greece)
Jurisdiction: Greece
Relevant Law: Article 12(3) GDPR
Article 12(4) GDPR
Article 15(1) GDPR
Article 15(3) GDPR
Article 16 GDPR
Article 58(2)(b) GDPR
Type: Complaint
Outcome: Upheld
Started:
Decided: 11.12.2019
Published:
Fine: None
Parties: n/a
National Case Number/Name: 43/2019
European Case Law Identifier: n/a
Appeal: n/a
Original Language(s): Greek
Original Source: HDPA (in EL)
Initial Contributor: n/a

The HDPA issued a reprimand to the Ministry of Mercantile Marine and Island Policy for infringement of the right of access.

English Summary

Facts

The Complainant was an employee at the Hellenic Ministry of Mercantile Marine and Island Policy and she claimed that the Ministry violated her right of access according to Article 15 GDPR and her right of rectification according to Article 16 GDPR. She was candidate for an executive position within the Ministry and asked via e-mail that all candidates are provided with the right of objection and the right for an internal administrative appeal. The Head of the Department replied to her that there was no right to objection in this phase and that all candidates have been treated equally. It also noted that the ranking lists of the candidates contain personal data and there is no legal obligation to publish them.

Dispute

Is there an obligation to publish ranking lists of candidates containing personal data?

Holding

The ranking lists of the candidates contain personal data and there is no legal obligation to publish them. The HDPA invoked the obligations of the data controllers according to Article 12(3) GDPR and Article 12(4) GDPR when a data subject may exercise their right of access according to Article 15(1) GDPR and Article 15(3) GDPR. Then, it explained that the right of objection and the right to internal administrative appeal under public administrative law constitute different legal bases and imply different legal consequences from the right to rectification under Article 16 GDPR. Thus, the data subject can’t exercise them by exercising the right to rectification under Article 16 GDPR. Finally, the HDPA issued a reprimand to the Ministry according to Article 58(2)(b) GDPR for the infringement of Article 12 GDPR and Article 15 GDPR.

Comment

Share your comments here!

Further Resources

Share blogs or news articles here!

English Machine Translation of the Decision

There is no available machine translated decision. Please refer to the Greek original decision for details.
Retrieved from "https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=HDPA_(Greece)_-_41/2019&oldid=36990"
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike
Powered by MediaWiki