CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-012: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
=== Facts === | === Facts === | ||
In | In May 2019, several media outlets revealed that the Monsanto company was processing personal data of more than 200 public figures like politicians, journalists and scientists involved in the glyphosate debate. | ||
At the same time, the | At the same time, the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés ("CNIL" or "French DPA") received seven complaints from data subjects whose personal information was included in Monsanto's filing system. | ||
The investigation revealed that (i) the filing system had been created on behalf of Monsanto by several companies specialized in public relations and lobbying; (ii) the filing system contained different information about the data subjects including job description, professional email address, mobile phone number, and sometimes Twitter account. Furthermore, (iv) a rating was given to every data subject, to estimate their influence and their support to Monsanto's activities. | |||
Furthermore, a rating was | |||
=== Holding === | === Holding === | ||
==== On the information of data subjects ==== | ==== On the information of data subjects ==== | ||
The CNIL found that the | The CNIL found that the creation of contact files for the purpose of lobbying is not illegal in itself. However, the French DPA found that the company had violated Article 14 GDPR for not having provided the data subjects with the mandatory information as soon as possible. Indeed, even if consent from those public figures was not necessary, they still had to be informed, so they could exercise their rights and especially their right to object. | ||
The CNIL also | The CNIL found that data subject were informed of the existence of the filing system only in 2019, after revelations in the media, even though the Monsanto company had all of their contact information. The CNIL also reminded that the fact of not informing the data subject of the existence of a processing harms the exercise of their others rights guaranteed under the GDPR. | ||
==== On the absence of judicial document between the controller and the processors ==== | ==== On the absence of judicial document between the controller and the processors ==== | ||
The CNIL found that the company | The CNIL found that the company had violated Article 28 GDPR. As a controller, Monsanto had to lead by a judicial document the processing realised by its processor, especially to guarantee security measures. The CNIL found that no contract between the companies contained the terms provided by the Article 28 GDPR. | ||
The CNIL found that no contract between the companies contained the terms provided by the | |||
== Comment == | == Comment == | ||
Revision as of 13:17, 4 August 2021
| CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-012 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | CNIL (France) |
| Jurisdiction: | France |
| Relevant Law: | Article 14 GDPR Article 28 GDPR |
| Type: | Investigation |
| Outcome: | Violation Found |
| Started: | |
| Decided: | 26.08.2021 |
| Published: | 28.08.2021 |
| Fine: | 400000 EUR |
| Parties: | Monsanto Company |
| National Case Number/Name: | SAN-2021-012 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | Unknown |
| Original Language(s): | French |
| Original Source: | Légifrance (in FR) |
| Initial Contributor: | Marco Vermeil |
The French DPA fined Monsanto €400,000 for creating files containing the personal data of more than 200 French and European political figures for the purpose of lobbying, without informing the data subjects, and without executing a data processing agreement with the relevant processor.
English Summary
Facts
In May 2019, several media outlets revealed that the Monsanto company was processing personal data of more than 200 public figures like politicians, journalists and scientists involved in the glyphosate debate.
At the same time, the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés ("CNIL" or "French DPA") received seven complaints from data subjects whose personal information was included in Monsanto's filing system.
The investigation revealed that (i) the filing system had been created on behalf of Monsanto by several companies specialized in public relations and lobbying; (ii) the filing system contained different information about the data subjects including job description, professional email address, mobile phone number, and sometimes Twitter account. Furthermore, (iv) a rating was given to every data subject, to estimate their influence and their support to Monsanto's activities.
Holding
On the information of data subjects
The CNIL found that the creation of contact files for the purpose of lobbying is not illegal in itself. However, the French DPA found that the company had violated Article 14 GDPR for not having provided the data subjects with the mandatory information as soon as possible. Indeed, even if consent from those public figures was not necessary, they still had to be informed, so they could exercise their rights and especially their right to object.
The CNIL found that data subject were informed of the existence of the filing system only in 2019, after revelations in the media, even though the Monsanto company had all of their contact information. The CNIL also reminded that the fact of not informing the data subject of the existence of a processing harms the exercise of their others rights guaranteed under the GDPR.
On the absence of judicial document between the controller and the processors
The CNIL found that the company had violated Article 28 GDPR. As a controller, Monsanto had to lead by a judicial document the processing realised by its processor, especially to guarantee security measures. The CNIL found that no contract between the companies contained the terms provided by the Article 28 GDPR.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the French original. Please refer to the French original for more details.
