CJEU - C-350/21 - Spetsializirana prokuratura (Retention of traffic and location data): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{CJEUdecisionBOX |Case_Number_Name=C-350/21 Spetsializirana prokuratura |ECLI= |Opinion_Link= |Judgement_Link=https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&doci...") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
=== Holding === | === Holding === | ||
Questions referred: | '''Questions referred:''' | ||
Is national legislation (Article 251b(1) of the Zakon za elektronnite saobshtenia (Law on electronic communications)) providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of all traffic data (traffic data and location data of users of electronic means of communication) for a period of 6 months in order to fight serious crime compatible with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in combination with Article 5(1) and recital 11 thereof, provided that the national legislation contains certain safeguards? | Is national legislation (Article 251b(1) of the Zakon za elektronnite saobshtenia (Law on electronic communications)) providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of all traffic data (traffic data and location data of users of electronic means of communication) for a period of 6 months in order to fight serious crime compatible with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in combination with Article 5(1) and recital 11 thereof, provided that the national legislation contains certain safeguards? |
Revision as of 11:44, 11 October 2021
CJEU - C-350/21 Spetsializirana prokuratura | |
---|---|
Court: | CJEU |
Jurisdiction: | European Union |
Relevant Law: | Article 15(1) Directive 2002/58 Article 5(1) Directive 2002/58 Article 251b(1) of the Zakon za elektronnite saobshtenia (Law on electronic communications) |
Decided: | |
Parties: | Spetsializirana prokuratura |
Case Number/Name: | C-350/21 Spetsializirana prokuratura |
European Case Law Identifier: | |
Reference from: | |
Language: | 24 EU Languages |
Original Source: | Judgement |
Initial Contributor: | n/a |
See Holding for questions referred.
English Summary
Facts
Facts pending decision.
Holding
Questions referred:
Is national legislation (Article 251b(1) of the Zakon za elektronnite saobshtenia (Law on electronic communications)) providing for the general and indiscriminate retention of all traffic data (traffic data and location data of users of electronic means of communication) for a period of 6 months in order to fight serious crime compatible with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in combination with Article 5(1) and recital 11 thereof, provided that the national legislation contains certain safeguards?
Is national legislation (Article 159a of the Nakazatelno-protsesualen kodeks (Code of Criminal Procedure)) which does not limit access to traffic data to what is strictly necessary and does not grant the persons whose traffic data are accessed by the law enforcement authorities the right to be notified thereof, provided that that does not impede criminal proceedings, or the right to a legal remedy against unlawful access compatible with Article 15(1) of Directive 2002/58, read in combination with Article 5(1) and recital 11 thereof?
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!