Accurate titles for the decisions of DPAs: Difference between revisions

From GDPRhub
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
|-
|-
|Austria
|Austria
|
|DSB (Austria) - year-0.XXX.XXX
|-
|-
|Belgium
|Belgium
Line 27: Line 27:
|-
|-
|Estonia
|Estonia
|
|AKI (Estonia) - 2.1.-X/XX/XXXX
|-
|-
|European  Union
|European  Union
Line 39: Line 39:
|-
|-
|Germany
|Germany
|
|Each DPA has its own rules
|-
|-
|Greece
|Greece
Line 54: Line 54:
|-
|-
|Italy
|Italy
|
|Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - XXXXXXX
|-
|-
|Latvia
|Latvia
Line 63: Line 63:
|-
|-
|Lithuania
|Lithuania
|
|ADA (Lithuania) - name of the case/of the parties
|-
|-
|Luxembourg
|Luxembourg
Line 72: Line 72:
|-
|-
|Netherlands
|Netherlands
|
|AP (The Netherlands) - name of the case
|-
|-
|News
|News

Revision as of 12:58, 29 June 2023

Given that GDPRhub.eu serves as a research tool for both experts and non-experts, it is important that the decisions uploaded on the platform are easily discoverable. Thus, we aim for that the decisions are named in a uniform way in order to ensure quick and easy searches.

DPA Title of the decision of that DPA
Austria DSB (Austria) - year-0.XXX.XXX
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia AKI (Estonia) - 2.1.-X/XX/XXXX
European Union
Finland
France
Germany Each DPA has its own rules
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - XXXXXXX
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania ADA (Lithuania) - name of the case/of the parties
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands AP (The Netherlands) - name of the case
News
Norway
Other
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
United Kingdom