OGH - 6Ob127/20z: Difference between revisions
From GDPRhub
(Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Austria |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=OGH |Court_With_Country=OGH (Austria) |Case_Number_Name=6Ob127/20z...") |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
|National_Law_Name_1=§ 151 Austrian Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung 1994 - GewO) | |National_Law_Name_1=§ 151 Austrian Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung 1994 - GewO) | ||
|National_Law_Link_1=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10007517&FassungVom=2018-06-12&Artikel=&Paragraf=151&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht= | |National_Law_Link_1=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/NormDokument.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=10007517&FassungVom=2018-06-12&Artikel=&Paragraf=151&Anlage=&Uebergangsrecht= | ||
|National_Law_Name_2=§ 228 Austrian Civil Procedure Act (Zivilprozessordnung - ZPO) | |||
|National_Law_Link_2=https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/eli/rgbl/1895/113/P228/NOR12020362t | |||
|Party_Name_1=unknown (claimant) | |Party_Name_1=unknown (claimant) |
Revision as of 08:36, 8 April 2021
OGH - 6Ob127/20z | |
---|---|
Court: | OGH (Austria) |
Jurisdiction: | Austria |
Relevant Law: | Article 4(1) GDPR Article 15(1) GDPR Article 79 GDPR § 151 Austrian Trade Regulation Act (Gewerbeordnung 1994 - GewO) § 228 Austrian Civil Procedure Act (Zivilprozessordnung - ZPO) |
Decided: | 18.02.2021 |
Published: | 01.04.2021 |
Parties: | unknown (claimant) Österreichische Post AG (defendant) |
National Case Number/Name: | 6Ob127/20z |
European Case Law Identifier: | ECLI:AT:OGH0002:2021:0060OB00127.20Z.0218.000 |
Appeal from: | OLG Linz 2 R 35/20k-19 |
Appeal to: | Not appealed |
Original Language(s): | German |
Original Source: | Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes (RIS) (in German) |
Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The Austrian Supreme Court held that a court must not issue a declaratory judgement that a controller has to provide access to certain data under Article 15 GDPR to a data subject if the controller had already fulfilled the data subject's requests for access and deletion and refrained from further processing the data subject's data.
English Summary
Facts
Lorem ipsum
Dispute
Lorem ipsum
Holding
The Austrian Supreme Court overturned a decision of the Higher Regional Court Linz and restored the decision of the first instance court:
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details.