CNPD (Portugal) - Deliberação 2021/533: Difference between revisions
From GDPRhub
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The Portuguese DPA ordered the National Statistical Institute to stop all data transfers to a | The Portuguese DPA ordered the National Statistical Institute to stop all data transfers to a service provider located in the US. | ||
== English Summary == | == English Summary == | ||
=== Facts === | === Facts === | ||
in | The Portuguese National Statistical Institute gathers data for their census through a [https://censos2021.ine.pt/ form in their website], using the services of Cloudfare, a service provider based in the US. | ||
=== Dispute === | === Dispute === | ||
Revision as of 08:25, 28 April 2021
| CNPD - Deliberação/2021/533 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | CNPD (Portugal) |
| Jurisdiction: | Portugal |
| Relevant Law: | Article 9 GDPR Article 44 GDPR Article 46 GDPR |
| Type: | Investigation |
| Outcome: | Violation Found |
| Started: | |
| Decided: | 27.04.2021 |
| Published: | 28.04.2021 |
| Fine: | None |
| Parties: | lnstituto Nacional de Estatística, l.P. Cloudflare, lnc. |
| National Case Number/Name: | Deliberação/2021/533 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | n/a |
| Original Language(s): | Portuguese |
| Original Source: | CNPD Deliberação (in PT) |
| Initial Contributor: | n/a |
The Portuguese DPA ordered the National Statistical Institute to stop all data transfers to a service provider located in the US.
English Summary
Facts
The Portuguese National Statistical Institute gathers data for their census through a form in their website, using the services of Cloudfare, a service provider based in the US.
Dispute
Holding
in progress
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the Portuguese original. Please refer to the Portuguese original for more details.
AVG12021I01 1
rJ
CNPD
Nacronãl Commission
of PYotData
DELTBERAÇÃO / 2021t533
l. lntroduction
i. The National Data Protection Commission (CNPD) received more than a dozen related participations
to the ongoing census operation - 2021 Censuses - carried out by the National Statistics Institute, l.P.NE), the
which partly takes place by filling in the online form available at the address
httos.//censos2021.ine.pt/ The largest share is linked to the survey's obligation to provide
identification data of all the full name. However, some participations
citizens,
associated the data provision obiigator identified with the transfer of data to a
company based in the United States of America.
2. Also on social networks, the same issue was raised, with media outlets reporting
that the information exposed there was not accurate.
3. CNPD, under the powers conferred by subparagraphs b) and Article 58.0 (1) of Regulation (EU)
20161679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 6 (General Regulation on the Protection
Data - RGPD), in conjunction with the provisions of article 3.0, paragraph 2 of article 4.0 and paragraph b) owner 1
of article6.0, all from Lein.0 58/2019, from August 1 (which has the object of insuring the execution, in
platform
internal law, of the GDPR), proceeded to the analysis of the INE internet site and the one made available there,
having concluded that this entity uses services provided by the company Cloudflare.
information to iNE regarding this operation on personal data.
ll. Analyze
i. Determined facts
4.0 form for collecting data from the 2021 Census is accessed through the available infrastructure
by (hereinafter, a company based in San Francisco, California, the United States
Cloudflare, lnc. Cloudflare),
United States of America. This company provides several security services on the Internet and Content Delivery
Network (CDN).
5. The CDN consists of a network of servers that aims to reduce the latency of access to the
servers- 1.e., the period of time between the user's action and the response to that action. With
effect, through an algorithm that sends information simultaneously to several servers, chooses that one
which requires a shorter response time. with islo, faster information delivery is achieved
and with greater robustness from the point of view of security.
(+351) 400 gerâl@cnpd.pt
Av. D.íosl, 134, 1o Í 213 928
'1200-6Lisboa F (+351) 213976 832 www.cnpd.pt AVGt2021t401 1v
6. Cloudflared has 200 (two hundred) data centers located in more than 100 countries, the vast majority of
which does not have an adequate level of data protection, as provided for in article 4 of the RGpD.
7.0 INE used services provided by the company Cloudflare through the online subscription of its Busmess
P / an '. This plan provides a set of services, with INE currently making use of WAF2, the
CDN, and Rate lrnrit3.
B. This plan is governed by 'self-servesubscription
Agreement'a (main contract for the provision of
services) and the data processing addendum (Data Processing Addendum version 3.0s), dated
1 October 2020, which is part of the main contract (cf. clause 6.1 of the main contract).
9.0 INE justified the execution of this contract with the objective of '(..) responding effectively to
performance and information security needs associated with dimension and complexity
of the operation
2021 Census ".
I0. Notwithstanding the use of these services, it is not, nor ever
was concerned that the information provided
by citizens through
of the 2021 censuses' Imormulários is housed in the lNE's seitores.
11. the citizen
When you access the 2021 Census form, you are forwarded to one of the
Cloudflare according to this algorithm. Even though the criterion underlying this algorithm is the highest
proximity of the servers to the location of the origin of the invocation, there is no guarantee that
of such a success,
since it depends on the load on them at each moment.
Cloudflare infrastructure communicates
with the DOINE server via TLS.
12 name
Censos2021 .ine.pt is associated with lP 172.67.41.182, located in the United States of America,
being assigned to CloudÍlare.0s clients access the site using the secure communication protocol
HTTPS, the associated certificate being issued by Cloudflare, tnECC CA-3, an entity
certifying
Cloudflare itself.
Therefore, this company holds both the private and public keys,
rSplit is presented on the Cloudflar website as a small business website
performance and security that is comercielelronic, eÍequeÍem
advanced, and give priority to .orr ... ãta, óni.o support. veí
2ttps: //www.cloudÍlare.com/plans/business/
A WAF helps protect waofiltremonitor applications from HTT traffic. Píotedos attack as cross regre Reguest Forgery,
Cross S, te Scí, pSoL /r.iectior, among others.
3 protects
Ráte, r? Itlng against Oeofservice (DoS) attacks - brute force attacks and malignant types.
Ihttps: //wwwcloudlare.com/terms/
5
f1
- 'l P 44
DPA v.3 1 in oct 2020odf AVçt2021t401 2
rJ
CNPD
National Commission
deProtedeData
getting enabled that
so the cyber and decryption of all communications between citizens access
to the form and send data to the lNE server.
13. Note that the fact that the encryption key used is from Cloudflare means the encryption is applied by
this entity, maintaining itself during the transit of the information, and is by it, and only by it, deciphered - that is,
before the delivery of all the information (the data packets) to lNE, aCloudflare must proceed with its
any intervention in this process.
decryption, not having INE
14. Incidentally, INE does not provide information between citizens and their service.
o admits control over transmission
Once inside Cloudflare's CDN network, OINE has no way of knowing if the traffic is directed to
servers located in the countries of the European Union, or resident in any other area of the globe.
15. As of the date of this determination, personal data has been collected from more than six million citizens
residing in national territory.
ii. Assessment in the light of the GDPR
16. There is no doubt that the information provided by citizens when filling out the forms
personal data, 1), of the GDPR - for
2021 Census consist of data in the terms of article 4.0, paragraph
information relating to identified natural persons, the census operation is subject to the GDPR, being
INE is responsible for the treatment, in accordance with paragraphs 2) and 7) of the same article.
17. While it is also certain that some of the information falls within the category of special personal data
in Article 9.0 (1) of the GDPR, and data processing is therefore subject to a more stringent protection
therefore, to carry out an impact assessment on data protection
rigorous and, since the obligation
(AIPD), in accordance with paragraph 1 and paragraph b.do paragraph 3 of article 9.0 of the GDPR.
therefore,
18. It should be noted that the AIPD must cover all operations on personal data, including,
the operation corresponding to the transport of information to and from Cloudflare servers, within the scope of
subcontracting relationship.
19.As for this point, INE declared to CNPD that '(..opted for the realization of an Impact Assessment
about Data Protection only to the statistical operation. main.lsto was due to the fact that the tests
(2016,2018,2020) ylsarem re applicational functionalities, are, as far as
just test harvesting processes and
in relation to solutions to plications, partly, therefore they did not allow testing and assessment of the risk related to sludge
the pIocesses. In this sense, only the final operation allowed to carry out a complete and comprehensive assessment
(+351) 213 geral@cnpd.t
Av. 0.arlol, 13410 Í 928 400
120M51 Lisboa F (1351213 976 832 www.cnpd.pt AVG / 2021/401 2 \.
in a scenario in which the Ímâ das decisions, given theandtopic context, were being
changed and optimized.
However, the respective contents
not yet integrated in order to be made available
immediate. Although systematic and continuous monitoring of EpD and RS / Censuses is guaranteed
2021. ',
20. No impact assessment has been carried out on this specific operation on data
INE did not carry out a weighting of the risks to the rights of the data subjects and,
consequently, it has not adopted, with respect to this operation, any
supplementary mitigating measure of these
risks, having only centered
performance and security of the system, including promoting a
consultation with the National Security Office.
21. About this operation,
INE did not consult CNPD, which would have allowed CNpD to comment and so
seek to safeguard the data holders' data.
22. However, even considering the purpose envisaged with this operation, there were other solutions that
would allow to mitigate the risks, guaranteeing INE a greater control over the data, and, from the outset, limiting
O
transit of personal data to the territory of the Member States of the European Union,
not implying your shipment
country third countries.
23. Now, the INE option implies, as demonstrated,
the transit of personal data by third country without
relation to the union that
European Union and do not have the appropriate level of protection. It also implies, by virtue of the
contract concluded, a specific authorization from INE to transfer personal data to the United States
United States of America (USA) and other countries where the servers used by
cloudflare (namely, South Africa, chinaIndia, Jordan, Mexico, Russia,
singapore)
24. As described above, in points 5 and 11, the personal data of resident citizens portugal
in are
sent to Cloudflare servers in different countries
in different unidentified or identifiable by
by the
Statistics Portugal or data holders. In addition, the decryption and decryption key is the property of Cloudflare.
25 0r4, at least
the contract concluded INE and Cloudflare foresees the transfer of personal data to anyone
of the 200 servers used, as well as the transfer of personal data to the USA.
26. With
effective terms of Daía Processing Addendum version 3.0 (hereinafter, DpA), which, it is recalled, integrates
The contract, personal data from the customer (data exporter) is transferred to Cloudflare (importer of
data) in the United States of America, using the international transfer mechanism
standard contractual clauses based on Commission Decision 2010 / 87lUE, of 5 February
2010, applicable AVGt2021t401 3
rJ
CNPD
National Commission
dPÍotqãdêDâdos
transfers of personal data to subcontractors established in third countries6, which do
part by
as part of the addendum and are, to that extent, customer subscriptions (heading m) of clause 1.1 of the DPA) 7.
27. DPA applies insofar as Cloudflare personal data submitted by the client to CloudÍlare
or, as is the case of lNE, collected and treated by the customer using the service, I pass this personal data
are subject to the applicable data protection legislation.
28. Thus, by (sub) contracting the services of Cloudflare, olNE, in his capacity as responsible for the treatment
and at the same time as a customer, accepted the conditions of use of the service, including the addendum to the terms of
processing of personal data, which contains a contact between the controller (lNE) and the
(Cloudflare) for personals for the United States of America.
subcontractor the data transfer the
general country that this
29. Still according to the terms of the DPA, INE granted an authorization to Cloudflare
can resort to others (sub-subcontractors, whether companies inside or outside the Group (clause 4.2),
recognizing and accepting that it might be necessary for the provision of the service to use (sub-
) subcontractors established in third countries (clause 6.4).
30, If standard contractual clauses are, in general, a legal instrument for data transfer
personal data for third countries, under the provisions of article 46.0, paragraph 2, point c), and paragraph 5, of
GDPR, it is necessary to verify, however, whether the legislation of the third State, which obviously overlaps with a
per
instrument of a contractual nature, does not diminish or deflate the guarantees offered by these clauses,
which precisely aim to compensate for the lack of an adequate level of protection in the country of destination
of the data (cf. article 44.0 and 46.0 of the GDPR) 8.
Court of the European Union (CJEU), it is the exporter of data that competes,
31. According to Justice
on a case-by-case basis, with the assistance of the data importer, verify that the specific country of destination
a level of data protection essentially equivalent to that guaranteed by the EU, and should, if possible, adopt
to overcome obstacles and ensure that data protection is
additional safeguards
keep it up. This obligation also stems from the fulfillment of the principle of responsibility, enshrined in
in Article 5.0, paragraph 2 of the GDPR.
ôAs per conseba doebs / leda Cloudflare, pítividad alitideeviste 27 de ocio de020, paÍa (reflection of a change in the
legem instrument that resets the transfer of personal data from the European Union (EU) to the United States to America (USA), which
ceased to be the decree of adequacy to the PÍoteçà of the PIVIVITYPrivacSh / e / d.), validated by the Government of the Union
European Union (CJEU) in July 2020, in the Schíems // case, to pass over the original clauses
7
https: //w',^/w.cioudfiare.com/clocuslomer SCCs odí
8See 92 and 93 of the Schrems House / iem that the Court emphasized and the assessment of the existence of an essential protection
equitable, then guaranteed in the EU in the country of destination of the data must be
report
qransferênciâ in the chapter of RGP0.
See paragraph 134 of the Schr judgment //.
CâÍlosl134 1 T (+ 3s1213928 400 geral@cnpd.pt
Av. D., â / ww.cnpd.pt
120M51 Lisboa F (+ 35i213 976 832 AVG / 2021/401 3v
I
32. According to the CJEU analysis in the Schrems case // the US legislation - which is the country of destination of
international transfers from Cloudflare under standard contractual clauses - allows for interference
on people's fundamental rights,
based on requirements related to national security and interest
which may result in access to personal data transferred from the EU to the USA and the use of such data
data under surveillance programs based on Section 702 of the FtSA (Foreign tntelligence Surveillance
Act) and Executive Decree 1233310.
33.0 CJEU concluded that such interferences are not proportional,
in the light of the Union's right, insofar as
the scope of the limitations on people's rights is not defined, there are no clear and precise rules regarding
application of these measures or minimum requirements for protection against risks of abuse, there is no
1uzo of necessity, and opposable rights are not conferred on holders
data or remedies
jurisdiction, because of the limitations on protection
data resulting from US law do not satisfy
The requirements required by the uElr Charter of Fundamental Rights (cf. articles7.0, g.0.47.0 and 52.0, paragraph 1).
34. Therefore, it would only be possible to carry out a personal data transfer to the USA if the legislation
here concerned, and expressly referred to by the CJEU, were it not directly or indirectly
applicable to Cloudflare
or their (sub-subcontractors, even so)
only through the adoption of supplementary measures that
could
demonstrably proves that this legislation would not be applicable or would have no practical effect
on personal data transferences.
35. However, the services provided by Cloudflare, namely those contracted by INE when
subscribed to Euslness P / an, place the company directly under the
within the scope of US legislation that imposes
the obligation
granting mass access to personal data by sitratados, right from the start as a provider
of electronic communications services r2, without prejudice to other types of services also being covered
other provisions of US surveillance legislation.
36. Cloudflare recognizes in point 7 of the DPA that, in its role as a subcontractor, it may
be the object of
requests for access to personal data, as part of
third parties within the scope of legal procedures, which may
Be "inconsistent" with the application applicable to your client, that is, RGpD. In this case, if there is a conflict,
Cloudflare declares that it will promptly inform the customer, unless such notification is strictly prohibited »
(cf. paragraph a) clause 7.'l).
r0VeÍ n.165 of the quoted acid, in which the grams are quoted by UpSTREAtú
rrSee numbers i 75-176, 1801915,
r2 and] 94 of the judgment.
Cf.Section702 daFISAchanged by paper50 USC s lBBt AVG / 2021/401 4
rJ
CNPD
National Commission
dPÍot @ of Data
37. It is precisely the case with this US legislation that prevents US companies from
inform their clients of the access made by the North American authorities to Íinsde collection of
information about foreigners, in the context of national security activity.
38. It appears, there is no guarantee that the personal data of citizens residing in Portugal,
collected
INE through its website, within the scope of Census 202.l, are not accessed by the authorities
intermediate
of the USA, by Cloudflare due to the services it provides to INEe that imply, as
contract signed, the transfer of such personal data to the USA.
39. In this sense, the standard contractual clauses, under which personal data are
transferred by NINE to Cloudflare, in the USA, if respected in the third country of destination, insofar as
these do not bind the authorities of that country, thus not offering the adequate guarantees required by the
RGPD, CNPD is obliged to prohibit these data transfers, according to the prescribed by ÍJUE.r3
40. In addition, according to the same judiciary, even though INE could demonstrate that the data
personal data were not transferred to the USA, data transit would always depend on the adoption of measures
that they do not verify.
adequate and sufficient, here
41. Under the terms of no. 2 of article 5.0 and article 24.0 of the RGPD, it is the responsibility of INE to comply with the
safe principles of personal data protection, as well as demonstrating compliance with treatments
personal data under your responsibility.
lll. Conclusion
42. In view of the foregoing and because there is no other corective measure capable of safeguarding the rights of titles
to the national institute
data, the CNPD decides, under the paragraph y) of paragraph 2 of article 58.0 of the GDPR, to order
of Statistics1.P.the suspension of the sending of personal data from the 2021 Census to the USA and to other countries
without an adequate level of protection, whether through Cloudflare, lnc., or another company, the term
maximum of 12 hours.
43. The same entity must also ensure, in the context of any subconditions, that the subcontractors
are not obliged to comply with legislation that removes the protection conferred by the RGPD.
r3Vern.0107e 121of the cited action.
ra '183
cf.n.os63e of the same judgment
geral@cnpd.pt
Av.D.Carlos, 134.10 T (+351) 213928400
1200 {51 Lisboa F (+ 35 ', 213 97632 r / vww.cnpd.pt AVG1202I401 4v
44. The hearing is waived, under the terms of paragraph a.) Of no. 1 of article124.0 of the Code of Procedure
Administrative, considering the urgency of the corrective measure, taking into account the time period
gives
what,
online of the Census and otherwise, the ILO would remain for the rights, freedoms and guarantees of
potentially more than four million, who have not yet fulfilled their legal obligation to respond to
census operation.
Approved at the meeting of April 27, 2021
FilipaCalvão (President)
