CJEU - C-560/21 - KISA: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{CJEUdecisionBOX |Case_Number_Name=C-560/21 KISA |ECLI= |Opinion_Link= |Judgement_Link=https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?text=&docid=250942&pageIndex=0&doclang=EN&m...") |
|||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: | If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative: | ||
2. Does the second sentence of Article 38(3) of the GDPR have a | 2. Does the second sentence of Article 38(3) of the GDPR have a | ||
sufficient legal basis, in particular in so far as the provision covers data protection officers who have an employment relationship with the controller? | sufficient legal basis, in particular in so far as the provision covers data protection officers who have an employment relationship with the controller? | ||
Revision as of 10:03, 27 April 2022
| CJEU - C-560/21 KISA | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court: | CJEU |
| Jurisdiction: | European Union |
| Relevant Law: | Article 38(3) GDPR |
| Decided: | |
| Parties: | Zweckverband ‘Kommunale Informationsverarbeitung Sachsen’ KISA |
| Case Number/Name: | C-560/21 KISA |
| European Case Law Identifier: | |
| Reference from: | BAG (Germany) |
| Language: | 24 EU Languages |
| Original Source: | Judgement |
| Initial Contributor: | n/a |
See Holding for questions referred.
English Summary
Facts
Facts pending decision.
Holding
Questions referred:
1. Is the second sentence of Article 38(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the General Data Protection Regulation; ‘the GDPR’) to be interpreted as precluding a provision of national law, such as, in the present case, the first sentence of Paragraph 6(4) of the Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (Federal Law on data protection), which makes dismissal of the data protection officer by the controller, who is his or her employer, subject to the conditions set out therein, irrespective of whether such dismissal relates to the performance of his or her tasks?
If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative:
2. Does the second sentence of Article 38(3) of the GDPR have a sufficient legal basis, in particular in so far as the provision covers data protection officers who have an employment relationship with the controller?
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
