AEPD (Spain) - PS/00224/2021
From GDPRhub
| AEPD (Spain) - PS/00224/2021 | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Authority: | AEPD (Spain) |
| Jurisdiction: | Spain |
| Relevant Law: | Article 5(1)(c) GDPR Article 13 GDPR |
| Type: | Complaint |
| Outcome: | Upheld |
| Started: | |
| Decided: | |
| Published: | 13.01.2022 |
| Fine: | 1500 EUR |
| Parties: | n/a |
| National Case Number/Name: | PS/00224/2021 |
| European Case Law Identifier: | n/a |
| Appeal: | Unknown |
| Original Language(s): | Spanish |
| Original Source: | AEPD (in ES) |
| Initial Contributor: | FA |
The Spanish DPA fined an individual €1500 for inadequately installing a video surveillance system in breach of the data minimisation principle.
English Summary
Facts
The complainant is a city council. The respondent is an individual.
The city council filed a complaint with the Spanish DPA regarding two video surveillance cameras that the individual put up on their property. The cameras faced the public highway, and the poster signalling their existence did not contain sufficient information on the data controller for the data they collected as well as on who data subjects would need to contact to enforce their rights.
Holding
After restating the law on installing video surveillance cameras, the Spanish DPA held the respondent violated Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR by intentionally or negligently positioning the cameras to record public areas without justified cause, therefore processing data of identifiable natural persons, and by failing to provide sufficient information as to the identity of the controller and where data subjects can go to exercise their rights under the GDPR.
As such, the DPA imposed a fine of €1500 on the individual and ordered them to move the cameras to comply with the GDPR.
Comment
Share your comments here!
Further Resources
Share blogs or news articles here!
English Machine Translation of the Decision
The decision below is a machine translation of the Spanish original. Please refer to the Spanish original for more details.
1/10
File No.: PS/00224/2021
RESOLUTION OF PUNISHMENT PROCEDURE
Of the procedure instructed by the Spanish Agency for Data Protection and based on
to the following
BACKGROUND
FIRST: Dated November 11, 2020 it is received in this Agency
claim filed by CITY COUNCIL OF ***CITY COUNCIL.1 (as regards
hereafter, the complaining party) against A.A.A. with NIF ***NIF.1 (hereinafter, the part
claimed) for having installed two video surveillance cameras on the facade of his
housing, C/ ***DIRECTORY.1, ***CITY COUNCIL.1, facing the public highway,
with an informative poster without information regarding the owner of the recording file or who
go to exercise the rights established in the regulations for the protection of
data.
For this reason, file E/09874/2020 was opened, sending a letter to the party
claimed informing you of the requirements to carry out treatment of
personal data through such devices. This letter was returned by the
postal service with the annotation "Returned to Origin due to surplus (not withdrawn in
office)".
Likewise, the claimant organization was informed that if the non-compliance
adoption of measures would be initiated, where appropriate, the actions provided for in the
data protection regulations.
On February 9, 2021, it had entry in this Spanish Protection Agency
of Data a document presented by the complaining party, by means of which it formulates
new claim against the claimed party for the installation of a
video surveillance oriented towards public roads and with the incomplete information poster,
There are indications of a possible breach of the provisions of the regulations of
Personal data protection.
It provides a photographic report, and a police report where it is indicated:
“(…) That during the intervention, this officer realizes that the house of the
applicant has two recording video cameras on the facade of the property,
facing public roads, one on ***CALLE.1 street, the other on ***CALLE.2 street,
with the corresponding informative poster established in the regulations on protection
of data (photos are attached), although they are blank, without data related to the
owner of the recording file or who to contact to exercise the rights
established in the regulations on data protection. That in addition to being a
sign not adjusted to current regulations. (…)”
SECOND: Prior to the acceptance of this claim for processing, it is
transferred to the claimed party, in accordance with the provisions of article 65.4 the
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 2/10
Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and
guarantee of digital rights (hereinafter, LOPDGDD), being notified with
dated March 12, 2021, as stated in the proof of delivery issued by the
mail service.
There is no record in this Agency of any response from the party complained against.
THIRD: The claim was admitted for processing by resolution of May 11
of 2021.
FOURTH: On July 9, 2021, the Director of the Spanish Agency for
Data Protection agreed to initiate a sanctioning procedure against the claimed party,
for the alleged infringement of articles 5.1.c) and 13 of the RGPD, typified in the
article 83.5 of the RGPD.
FIFTH: After the period granted for the formulation of allegations to the
agreement to start the procedure, received by the claimed party on 05
August 2021, it has been verified that this Agency has not received an allegation
some to the same
Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure
Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which
the party claimed was informed in the agreement to open the proceeding-
establishes that if allegations are not made within the stipulated period on the content of the
initiation agreement, when it contains a precise statement about the
imputed responsibility, may be considered a resolution proposal. At
present case, the agreement to initiate the disciplinary proceedings determined the
facts in which the imputation was specified, the infraction of the RGPD attributed to the
claimed and the sanction that could be imposed. Therefore, taking into account that
the party complained against has made no objections to the agreement to initiate the file and
In accordance with the provisions of article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP, the aforementioned agreement of
beginning is considered in the present case resolution proposal.
In view of everything that has been done, by the Spanish Data Protection Agency
In this proceeding, the following are considered proven facts:
FACTS
FIRST: On February 9, 2021, this Agency received a claim
against A.A.A. with NIF ***NIF.1 for having two video surveillance cameras installed in
the facade of your home, C/ ***DIRECTORY.1, ***CITY COUNCIL.1, facing
towards the public thoroughfare, with an informative poster without data related to the owner of the file of
recording or who to contact to exercise the rights established in the regulations
of data protection.
SECOND: Several photographs and a police report of the
Town Hall of *** TOWN HALL.1.
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 3/10
THIRD: The Agreement to Start this sanctioning procedure was notified
dated August 5, 2021, without, to date, having received
in this Agency allegations by the respondent.
FOUNDATIONS OF LAW
I
By virtue of the powers that article 58.2 of the RGPD recognizes to each authority of
control, and according to the provisions of articles 47 and 48.1 of the LOPDGDD, the Director
of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection is competent to resolve this
process.
II
The physical image of a person under article 4.1 of the RGPD is personal data
and its protection, therefore, is the subject of said Regulation. Article 4.2 of the GDPR
defines the concept of “treatment” of personal data.
Article 22 of the LOPDGDD establishes the specificities of data processing
for video surveillance purposes, indicating the following:
"one. Natural or legal persons, public or private, may carry out the
processing of images through camera systems or video cameras with the
purpose of preserving the safety of people and property, as well as their
facilities.
2. Images of public roads may only be captured to the extent that
is essential for the purpose mentioned in the previous section.
However, it will be possible to capture the public road in an extension
superior when necessary to guarantee the security of goods or
strategic installations or infrastructures linked to transport, without
In no case may it involve capturing images of the interior of a home
private.
3. The data will be deleted within a maximum period of one month from its
collection, except when they had to be kept to prove the commission of
acts that threaten the integrity of persons, property or facilities. In that
case, the images must be made available to the competent authority in
within a maximum period of seventy-two hours from the date of knowledge of the
existence of the recording.
The blocking obligation provided for in
article 32 of this organic law.
4. The duty of information provided for in article 12 of the Regulation (EU)
2016/679 will be understood to be fulfilled by placing an informative device
in a sufficiently visible place identifying, at least, the existence of the treatment,
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/10
the identity of the person in charge and the possibility of exercising the rights provided for in the
Articles 15 to 22 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679. It may also be included in the
informative device a connection code or internet address to this
information.
In any case, the data controller must keep available to
those affected the information referred to in the aforementioned regulation.
5. Under article 2.2.c) of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, it is considered
excluded from its scope of application the treatment by a natural person of images
that they only capture the interior of their own home.
This exclusion does not cover processing carried out by a security entity
private that had been contracted for the surveillance of a home and had access
to the images.
6. The processing of personal data from the images and
sounds obtained through the use of cameras and video cameras by the Armed Forces
and Security Bodies and by the competent bodies for surveillance and control in
penitentiary centers and for the control, regulation, vigilance and discipline of the
traffic, will be governed by the legislation transposing Directive (EU) 2016/680,
when the treatment is for the purposes of prevention, investigation, detection or
prosecution of criminal offenses or execution of criminal sanctions, including
protection and prevention against threats to public safety. Out of
In these cases, said treatment will be governed by its specific legislation and
additionally by Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and this organic law.
7. What is regulated in this article is understood without prejudice to the provisions of
Law 5/2014, of April 4, on Private Security and its development provisions.
8. The treatment by the employer of data obtained through information systems
cameras or video cameras is subject to the provisions of article 89 of this law
organic.”
III
In accordance with the foregoing, the processing of images through a
video surveillance system, to be in accordance with current regulations, must comply with
the following requirements:
- Respect the principle of proportionality.
- When the system is connected to an alarm center, you can only
be installed by a private security company that meets the requirements
contemplated in article 5 of Law 5/2014 on Private Security, of April 4.
- The video cameras will not be able to capture images of the people who
are outside the private space where the security system is installed.
video surveillance, since the processing of images in public places can only be
carried out, unless there is government authorization, by the Forces and Corps of
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 5/10
Security. Nor can spaces owned by third parties be captured or recorded without
the consent of their owners, or, as the case may be, of the persons who are
find.
This rule admits some exceptions since, on some occasions, for the protection
of private spaces, where cameras have been installed on facades or inside,
it may be necessary to guarantee the security purpose the recording of a
portion of public road. That is, cameras and video cameras installed for the purpose of
security will not be able to obtain images of public roads unless it is
essential for said purpose, or it is impossible to avoid it due to the location of
those and, extraordinarily, the minimum space for said
purpose. Therefore, the cameras could exceptionally capture the portion
minimally necessary for the intended security purpose.
- The duty to inform those affected provided for in the
articles 12 and 13 of the RGPD, and 22 of the LOPDGDD, in the terms already indicated.
- The person in charge must keep a record of treatment activities
carried out under its responsibility, including the information to which it makes
reference article 30.1 of the RGPD.
- The installed cameras cannot obtain images from private space of
third party and/or public space without duly accredited justified cause, nor can
affect the privacy of passers-by who move freely through the area. No this
allowed, therefore, the placement of cameras towards the private property of neighbors
with the purpose of intimidating them or affecting their private sphere without just cause.
- In no case will the use of surveillance practices be admitted beyond the
environment object of the installation and in particular, not being able to affect the spaces
surrounding public, adjoining buildings and vehicles other than those accessing the
guarded space.
In summary and to facilitate the consultation of interested parties, the Spanish Agency for
Data Protection offers through its website [https://www.aepd.es] access to
the legislation on the protection of personal data, including the RGPD and the
LOPDGDD (section “Reports and resolutions” / “regulations”), as well as the Guide
on the use of video cameras for security and other purposes, as well as the Guide
for compliance with the duty to inform (both available in the section “Guides
and tools”).
It is also of interest, in the event of carrying out low-risk data processing, the
facilitates free tool (in the “Guides and tools” section), which, through
specific questions, allows to assess the situation of the person in charge with respect to the
treatment of personal data that it carries out, and where appropriate, generate various
documents, informative and contractual clauses, as well as an annex with measures
guidelines considered minimum.
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 6/10
IV
In the present case, the claim was filed because the respondent has
installed two video surveillance cameras on the facade of his home, oriented
towards the public thoroughfare, with an informative poster without data related to the owner of the file of
recording or who to contact to exercise the rights established in the regulations
of data protection.
As proof of these manifestations, the evidence indicated in the
“Facts” section of this agreement.
The corrective powers available to the Spanish Agency for the Protection of
Data, as a control authority, is established in article 58.2 of the RGPD. Between
they have the power to issue a warning -article 58.2.b)-, the
power to impose an administrative fine in accordance with article 83 of the RGPD -
article 58.2 i)-, or the power to order the controller or processor
that the treatment operations comply with the provisions of the RGPD, when
appropriate, in a certain way and within a specified period -article 58. 2
d)-.
According to the provisions of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the measure provided for in article 58.2
d) of the aforementioned Regulation is compatible with the sanction consisting of a fine
administrative.
v
In accordance with the evidence available and which has not been
distorted in the sanctioning procedure, the claimed party has installed two
video surveillance cameras that could be capturing images of third parties, and
In addition, the informative poster of the existence of said chamber is incomplete, so
It is considered that these facts violate the provisions of articles 5.1.c) and 13
of the RGPD, which supposes the commission of infractions typified in article 83.5 of the
GDPR, which provides the following:
"Infringements of the following provisions shall be sanctioned, in accordance
with paragraph 2, with administrative fines of a maximum of EUR 20,000,000 or,
in the case of a company, an amount equivalent to a maximum of 4% of the
global total annual turnover of the previous financial year, opting for
the largest amount:
a) the basic principles for the treatment, including the conditions for the
consent under articles 5, 6, 7 and 9;
b) the rights of the interested parties according to articles 12 to 22;
[…].”
For the purposes of the limitation period for infractions, the infractions indicated in
the previous paragraph are considered very serious and prescribe after three years, in accordance with
Article 72.1 of the LOPDGDD, which establishes that:
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 7/10
"According to the provisions of article 83.5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679
are considered very serious and will prescribe after three years the infractions that suppose
a substantial violation of the articles mentioned therein and, in particular, the
following:
a) The processing of personal data violating the principles and guarantees
established in article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
b) The processing of personal data without the concurrence of any of the
conditions of legality of the treatment established in article 6 of the
Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
(…)
h) The omission of the duty to inform the affected party about the treatment of their
personal data in accordance with the provisions of articles 13 and 14 of the
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and 12 of this Organic Law.
(…)»
SAW
The fine imposed must be, in each individual case, effective, proportionate
and dissuasive, in accordance with the provisions of article 83.1 of the RGPD. Therefore,
It is appropriate to graduate the sanction to be imposed in accordance with the criteria established by the
article 83.2 of the RGPD, and with the provisions of article 76 of the LOPDGDD, regarding
to section k) of the aforementioned article 83.2 RGPD:
In the initial assessment, the following have been considered:
- The nature of the offense by having a video surveillance system that
is oriented towards public transit areas without just cause, trying to
data of identifiable natural persons (art. 83.5 a) RGPD.
- The intention or negligence of the infraction, the cameras are oriented
to the outside of your establishment (83.2.b) RGPD).
- The informative poster that appears on the façade does not indicate who the
responsible for the treatment and where the interested parties can go to
exercise your rights recognized in the RGPD.
SAW
However, as already indicated in the initial agreement and in accordance with the
established in the aforementioned article 58.2 d) of the RGPD, according to which each authority of
control may "order the person responsible or in charge of processing that the
processing operations comply with the provisions of this Regulation,
where appropriate, in a certain manner and within a specified period […].”
The respondent is required to take the following steps:
- provide the images observed with the devices in question,
indicating on a location map the parts that correspond to its
private property.
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 8/10
- Prove that you proceeded to remove the cameras from the places
current, or to the reorientation of the same towards their particular area.
- certifies having proceeded to place the informative device in the
video-monitored areas or to complete the information offered in the same
(must identify, at least, the existence of a treatment, the identity
of the person in charge and the possibility of exercising the rights foreseen in
said precepts), locating this device in a sufficiently
visible, both in open and closed spaces.
- certifies that it keeps the information available to those affected
referred to in the aforementioned RGPD.
It is warned that not meeting the requirements of this organization may be
considered as an administrative offense in accordance with the provisions of the RGPD,
typified as an infraction in its article 83.5 and 83.6, being able to motivate such conduct the
opening of a subsequent sanctioning administrative proceeding.
Therefore, in accordance with the applicable legislation and having assessed the criteria for
graduation of sanctions whose existence has been proven,
the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency RESOLVES
FIRST: IMPOSE A.A.A. with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of article 5.1.c)
of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD, a fine of €1,000 (one thousand euros).
SECOND: IMPOSE A.A.A. with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of article 13
of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD, a fine of €500 (Five hundred
euros).
THIRD: ORDER A.A.A. with NIF ***NIF.1 which, by virtue of article 58.2.d)
of the GDPR, within ten days, take the following measures:
- provide the images observed with the devices in question,
indicating on a location map the parts that correspond to its
private property.
- Prove that you proceeded to remove the cameras from the places
current, or to the reorientation of the same towards their particular area.
- certifies having proceeded to place the informative device in the
video-monitored areas or to complete the information offered in the same
(must identify, at least, the existence of a treatment, the identity
of the person in charge and the possibility of exercising the rights foreseen in
said precepts), locating this device in a sufficiently
visible, both in open and closed spaces.
- certifies that it keeps the information available to those affected
referred to in the aforementioned RGPD.
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 9/10
FOURTH: NOTIFY this resolution to A.A.A.
FIFTH: Warn the sanctioned party that he must make the imposed sanction effective once
Once this resolution is enforceable, in accordance with the provisions of the
article 98.1.b) of the LPACAP, within the voluntary payment term established in article
68 of the General Collection Regulations, approved by Royal Decree 939/2005, of
July 29, in relation to article 62 of Law 58/2003, of December 17,
by entering, indicating the NIF of the sanctioned person and the procedure number
that appears at the top of this document, in the restricted account number ES00
0000 0000 0000 0000 0000, opened in the name of the Spanish Protection Agency
of Data in the banking entity CAIXABANK, S.A.. Otherwise, it will proceed to
its collection in executive period.
Received the notification and once executed, if the date of execution is
between the 1st and 15th of each month, both inclusive, the term to make the payment
voluntary will be until the 20th day of the following month or immediately after, and if
between the 16th and last day of each month, both inclusive, the payment term
It will be until the 5th of the second following month or immediately after.
In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDGDD, this
Resolution will be made public once it has been notified to the interested parties.
Against this resolution, which puts an end to the administrative procedure in accordance with art. 48.6 of the
LOPDGDD, and in accordance with the provisions of article 123 of the LPACAP, the
Interested parties may optionally file an appeal for reconsideration before the
Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection within a month from
counting from the day following the notification of this resolution or directly
contentious-administrative appeal before the Contentious-Administrative Chamber of the
National Court, in accordance with the provisions of article 25 and section 5 of
the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the
Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months from the
day following the notification of this act, as provided in article 46.1 of the
aforementioned Law.
Finally, it is pointed out that in accordance with the provisions of article 90.3 a) of the LPACAP,
The firm resolution may be provisionally suspended in administrative proceedings if the
The interested party expresses his intention to file a contentious-administrative appeal.
If this is the case, the interested party must formally communicate this fact by
writing addressed to the Spanish Agency for Data Protection, presenting it through
Electronic Register of the Agency [https://sedeagpd.gob.es/sede-electronica-
web/], or through any of the other records provided for in article 16.4 of the
aforementioned Law 39/2015, of October 1. You must also transfer to the Agency the
documentation proving the effective filing of the contentious appeal-
administrative. If the Agency was not aware of the filing of the appeal
contentious-administrative within a period of two months from the day following the
notification of this resolution would end the precautionary suspension.
938-26102021
Sea Spain Marti
Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 10/10
C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es
28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es
