Search results

Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA). Dr. Giorgos Rousopoulos, representing the Scientific Personnel Association of the HDPA, addressed the audience and expressed

freedoms. The HDPA explicitly stated its concerns about this law's compatibility with the GDPR in its Opinion 1/2020. Pursuant to Article 21(1) of the Data

far as 2011, the Greek DPA issued a national directive for the CCTV at workplaces, and that national directive was also a reference to that decision. Relative

PERSONAL DATA 37/2020 (Department) The Personal Data Protection Authority met in a department composition at its headquarters on 19-02-2020 at the invitation

decision for details. HELLENIC REPUBLIC Athens, 26-02-2020 Ref.:C/ΕΞ/1552/26-02-2020 DECISION NO. 3/2020 (part) The Personal Data Protection Authority met

present, but they did not receive any response. The HDPA asked the company to clarify its position. The HDPA stressed that the fulfillment of the right to information

PERSONAL DATA 38/2020 (Department) The Personal Data Protection Authority met in a department composition at its headquarters on 19-02-2020 at the invitation

(Artcile 5(1) GDPR) and the content of Article 6 GDPR and the provisions of the HDPA Order 1/2011 to be fulfilled and implemented. But, the HDPA noted that

(c)), C/EX/2332-1/14-05-2019 (for the complaint under (b) and (c)) and C/EX/2332-1/14-05-2019 (for the complaint under (d)). d'), C/EX/3218- 1/06-06-2019 (for

accordance with the provisions of articles 55 para. 1, 2 para. 1 and 3 para. 2 GDPR and 13 para. 1 item g' Law 4624/2019, the Authority has the authority

respectively, the reference numbers G / EX / 5585- 1 / 18-08-2020 and G / EX / 5585-2 / 18-08-2020 documents respectively, requesting to provide the necessary

principle Article 5(1)(c) by sharing an employee's personal and health data with multiple recipients without proper justification. The HDPA ordered DEYA X to

supplemented file. The HDPA held that COSMOTE violated Articles 5 and 6 Law 3471/2006 (national law implementing the Directive 2002/58/EC Directive on privacy and

database and that any such call was made by mistake. The respondent informed the HDPA that their election-related promotional phone calls were operated by a group

Guidelines 5/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679, 4 1920 2020, pp. 38-39. See EDPB, Guidelines 5/2020 on consent under Regulation 2016/679, 4 May 2020, p.

Complaint no. Γ/ΕΙΣ/7103/16-10-2020, Γ/ΕΙΣ/7255/22-10-2020, Γ/ΕΙΣ/7299/23-10- 2020, G/EIS/7300/23-10-2020 and G/EIS/7301/23-10-2020 notifications of breaches

purpose limitation under Article 5(1)(a) of the GDPR. 1(b) and the obligation (principle) of accountability under Article 5(1)(b). 2 of the GDPR, that is to

to call the company for section meeting on 11-11-2020, with reference number C / EX / 6076-1 / 30-10-2020 her document. The company attended the meeting

Teleraise): one (1) complaint (with item G.C.1 in the Appendix) d) ST & Co. E.E. (hereinafter also Zitatel): eight (8) complaints (with items G.D.1 to G.D.7 and

after a thorough discussion, DECIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW 1. With article 5 par. 1 of the General Regulation (EU) 2016/ 679 for the protection of