Search results

own profile (applications r) - v)) and - "Group 4": improved means of contacting the defendant for paying doctors (applications w) - x)). With regard to the

period of time has elapsed as a human rights concern (see ECHR, M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 2018, nos. 60798/10 and 65599/10, § 100)

article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels - 2019/AR/1600- p. 3 - •

not outweigh the interests of the data subject (op. cit. marginal 101 f. m.w.r.). In this weighing up of interests, not only the type (criticality) and scope

203/22, r+s 2023, 265 Rn. 17; BGH ruling of April 22, 2022 – VI ZR 147/21, r+s 2022, 478 Rn. 6; BGH judgment of March 7, 2017 – VI ZR 125/16, r+s 2017,

data. This is in line with case-law by the Austrian Administrative Court (W 258 2217446-1 on the presumed "affinity for a political party"). the data subject

case of the plaintiff party C***** W*****, represented by T*****, against the defendant party Ö*****, represented by W*****, for EUR 2,500.00 s.A, on the

plaintiff, (Agent: mr. R.J.G. Ensink), and The college of mayor and aldermen of the municipality of Dongen (defendant) (Agents: mr. W.C.J.M. Dankers and [name

officio 4. 3R.v.St., June 29, 1993, e.g. Vedesca, no. 43,526. 4 MAREEN, D., The motives of the administrative legal act, TBP 2000, 20-38. See also: R.v.St.,

2018, against the N*** party E***stadt (respondent), represented by Erich R***, for violation of the right to secrecy as follows - The complaint is dismissed

GmbH). Company A used the services of company C (Amazon Web Services EMEA S.à r.l.) a subsidiary of company D (Amazon Web Services, Inc.) based in the United

reasons cited must suffice to Decision to wear. r PAGE 01-00001823325-0031-0040-02-01-� �!l�l!I L oo-w. _J, Court of Appeal Brussels -2020/AR/813- p. 32

AFFICHE_W in addition to verifying that they are not necessary cookies, are identified by the website itself as advertising, IDE and AFFICHE_W or, They

for example, KG Berlin, Order of 4 July 2017 - 1 W 153/16 - StAZ 2018, 183 and of 1 August 2013 - 1 W 413/12 - StAZ 2013, 348). 51 In administrative court

regard to bringing the processing into line with aforementioned provisions. r PAGE 01-00002223628-0002-0011-1-01-01-� L _JCourt of appeal Brussels-2021/AR/282-

confirms the contested decision. This decision was made by Mrs. A.R. Sturhoofd, J.H. Lieber and J.W. van Zaane and pronounced in public on June 1, 2021 by the

ECLI:NL:HR:2017:208, NJ 2017/134 m.nt. S.D. Lindenbergh and YES 2017/56 m.t. M.R. Hebly (Donata/New India), para. 3.3.3 (which statement is also cited in footnote

v. Commissioners of Customs & Excise (1973) 2 AllE.R 943 and Banker’s Trust v. Shabira (1980) 1 W.L.R 1274 are covered by this Law and, by extension, are

processing of data, determined in a G e . m P E P ro p o r ti o n d of f a l e r e c t a r e n t s o S R C T P AV deceived by interested parties. Since then

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 09.08.2021 Business number W211 2222613-2 Saying W211 2222613-2/12E DECISION The Federal Administrative Court decides