Search results

of RON 12,424 (approximately €2,500). At the same time, the DPA imposed a corrective measure based on Article 58(2)(d) GDPR and ordered the controller to

deletion request of the data in question, breaching Article 17(1) GDPR. Pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, the DPA ordered the controller to remedy the irregularities

basis of Article 6(1)(e) GDPR - public interest - or the legal basis of Article 6(1)(f) GDPR - legitimate interest. Moreover, Article 21(3) GDPR specifically

GDPR. As result, the controller was fined approximately €5,000 (RON 24,745). Furthermore, using their powers laid down in Article 58(2)(d) GDPR , the DPA

based on Article 3, paragraph 2, Article 5, paragraph 1 a), f) of GDPR subsection, Article 6(1), Article 9(2), Article 58(2)(d), GDPR Article 23 and Article

further details see Article 14(1)(d) GDPR. Similar to the ex-ante information in Article 13(1)(e) and 14(1)(e) GDPR, Article 15(1)(c) GDPR requires the controller

measures, as per Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, have been adopted, obliging the controller to complete implementation of relevant technical and organizational measures

9871 (approximately €2000) for these violations. In accordance with Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, the DPA also imposed corrective measures. First, the DPA ordered

administrative penalty fee: 1) Article 5, Paragraph 1, subparagraphs d and a; 2) Article 13; 3) paragraph 3 of Article 12; and 4) Article 15(1). Viking Line Oy

GDPR and Article 66.2 WOG); and • compliance with the transparency obligations (Article 12 GDPR) and the te provide information (Article 13 GDPR). Page

data transmitted, stored or otherwise processed." As such, under Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, the controller was ordered to take into account the risk assessment

the wording of Article 77(1) GDPR and from Article 58(2)(d) GDPR that national DPAs only have competence to take action with respect to GDPR violations that

evaluating the effectiveness of security measures (Article 32(1)(d) GDPR). According to Article 4(5) GDPR, "pseudonymisation" means the processing of personal

with Chapter V of the GDPR. Therefore, it requested the Irish DPA to adopt against Meta an order pursuant to Article 58(2)(d) GDPR. The EDPB also established

9,798.6 (approximately €2000). In accordance with Article 58(2)(d) GDPR, the DPA also imposed corrective measures. First, it ordered the data controller

reference, see Article 143 of the Code). However, detailed time-limits can be found in Regolamento n. 2/2019 cited above. Under Article 154 of the Code

breached Article 6(1)(e) GDPR and ordered all 53 municipalities to bring their processing in line with Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Article 6(1) GDPR, by ensuring

reliance on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR or at least exercise the right to object under Article 21 GDPR. If the legal basis is Article 6(1)(f) GDPR (i.e. 'legitimate

commentary to Article 60 GDPR, Article 61 GDPR, Article 62 GDPR, Article 63 GDPR, Article 64 GDPR, Article 65 GDPR, Article 66 GDPR and Article 56 GDPR. The SA

provided for in Article 6(1)(a) GDPR or, as the case may be, Article 9(2)(a) GDPR, and consent is withdrawn according to Article 7(3) GDPR, data must be