Search results

sentence 1 VwGO). 53 The claim of the plaintiff is based on Art. 15 para. 3 sentence 1, Art. 12 para. 5 sentence 1 DSGVO in conjunction with Art. 5 para

Article 6 (1) (c) GDPR to fulfill the employer's legal obligation and to safeguard the client's legitimate interests in accordance with Art 6 Paragraph 1 lit

to To 1): € 1.200,00 To 2): € 300,00 To 3): € 300,00 . . . In total: € 1.800 To 1): 3 days To 2): 1 day To 3): 1 day ... In total: 5 days Ad 1): Art. 83

4/1945 B-VG Art. 133 valid from 01/03/1930 to 06/30/1934 BVwGG § 10 today BVwGG § 10 valid from 01/01/2014 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from

to object is dismissed. Legal basis: Art. 15, Art. 17, Art. 21, Art. 51 (1), Art. 57 (1) lit. f, Art. 77 (1) and Art. 91 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 ( General

15 Paragraph 2 AGG, Section 61b Paragraph 1 ArbGG, Section 242 BGB, Art 15 EUV 2016/679, Art 82 Paragraph 1 EUV 2016/679 ... more Claim for compensation

October 12, 2023, Zl. W256 2275675-1/4E, regarding the suspension of proceedings in a data protection matter (Parties involved: 1. S P in W, and 2. Labor Market

guaranteed by Art. 1 and Art. 2 GG. Personal rights are treated as other rights i.S. protected from objectively unlawful interventions by Section 823 (1) of the

system. 10 As of August 1, 2018, only the working times determined by time recording would be valid. It was also announced that from September 1, 2018,

to Art. 82 Para. 1 DS-GVO in case of violation of the duty to provide information according to Art. 15 Para. 1 DS-GVO chain of standards: GDPR Art. 15

according to To 1): Art 5 Paragraph 1, Art 9 in conjunction with Art 83 Paragraph 5 lit a GDPR To 2): Art 5 para 1, Art 6 para 1 in conjunction with Art 83 para

first party involved for expenses of EUR 1,106.40 within 14 days, otherwise execution. Reason I. Roman one. 1 1. By decision of the data protection authority

applying the provisions of Section 1 (1) and (2) DSG, Art. 4 Z 7 Previous search term GDPR Next search term and Art. 6 Section 1 lit constitutionally guaranteed

preliminary ruling: "1. Is Art. 83 (4) to (6) GDPR to be interpreted in such a way that it incorporates the functional company concept assigned to Art. 101 and 102

to 06/30/1934 DSG Art. 1 § 1 today DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01.2014 last changed by Federal Law Gazette I No. 51/2012 DSG Art. 1 § 1 valid from 01.01

paragraph 1 AVG §73 paragraph 1 B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 Paragraph 1 DSG §24 Paragraph 10 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art51 GDPR Art56 GDPR Art60 GDPR Art65 GDPR

attorney is admissible (§ 68, Subsection 1, Sentence 1, GKG); it was filed in due form and time (§ 68, Subsection 1, Sentence 3 in conjunction with § 63,

is not only secondary law (Art. 51 para. 1 and Art. 52 GDPR), but also explicitly by Art.8 Para.1 GRC (as well as Art.16 Para.1 TFEU). is protected, speaks

instructions, Art. 38 Para. 3 DS-GVO. According to Art. 39 DS-GVO, he is primarily responsible for information, advice and monitoring tasks. According to Art. 4 No

date 09/06/2023 standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 DSG §24 GDPR Art58 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 1st, 2019 to May 24th, 2018 last