Search results

ROOM - GOYA 14 (MADRID) Phone: 914007258 Email: Team/User: MAD NIG: 28079 24 4 2022 0000131 1 JURISPRUDENCE Model: ANS105 JUDGMENT CCO COLLECTIVE CONFLICTS

compliance with the exercise of a proper local news right. It added that (4) the photograph was not a mug shot and did not show the data subject in any

as "Regulation 2016/679"), following an administrative procedure initiated ex officio to impose on Ms A. T. conducting business activity under the name

understood broadly (Hödl in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 4 DSGVO Rz 9; Eßer in Eßer/Kramer/von Lewinski, DSGVO-BDSG6 Art 4 DSGVO Rz 7). [16] 2.1 Therefore, even inner

refer to the Greek original for more details. Summary The Authority examined ex officio the compliance of the Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs

within a period of four weeks. Legal basis: Art. 4 Z 1, Z 2 and Z 11, Art. 6 Para. 1 lit. c, Art. 7 Para. 4, Art. 9, Art. 51 Para. 1, Art. 57 Para. f, Art

identification data of the parties be published directly. 3Ibid. Decision 57/2022 - 4/4 12. In accordance with its dismissal policy, the Disputes Chamber will refer

the legitimate aim pursued. 4. Where processing for a purpose other than that for which the personal data have been collected 4. Where processing for a purpose

which the personal data are intended and the legal basis of the processing; 4.5.2016 L 119/40 Official Journal of the European Union EN (d) where the processing

Article 4, introductory paragraph, and (17) of the AVG, in the EU during the period from 25 May 2018 to the present. The breach continues today. 4. Penalty

examination of the elements of the file, the Authority with no. prot.G/EX/3007/23-11-2022 and G/EX/3005/23-11-2022 documents invited the above-mentioned companies

Directive 01/2011 and Law 4624/2019, as well as the GDPR. According to Article 9(4) of Directive 01/2011, the transmission to third parties of data originating

initiative. 4. The Authority obliges the Data Controller to pay a data protection fine of HUF 1000000, ie HUF 1 million. The fine pursuant to point 4 shall be

this way across. However, on 4 February 2020, the database was no longer available in this way. The Authority's NAIH / 2020/66/4. By order no., he called for

amended) (hereinafter referred to as the "Regulation 2016/679"), after conducting ex officio administrative proceedings to impose an administrative fine on East

after consent was withdrawn. Following several compaints, the DPA launched an "ex officio" investigation. The controller (Client 1, Pitagorasz Oktatási Stúdió

Article 12(3) GDPR (the controller failed to answer within a month), Article 12(4) GDPR (The controller failed to provide a reason why it did not comply with

the context of the investigation of the complainants, sent the no. prot. G / EX / 2241 / 24.3.20 document for providing clarifications regarding the complaint

with article 4.1 of the RGPD, is data personal protection and their protection, therefore, is the object of said Regulation. In article 4.2 of the RGPD

Disputes Chamber. Decision 42/2022 - 4/5 therefore to be regarded as manifestly unfounded within the meaning of Article 57.4 of the GDPR. 12. Finally, and in