Search results

German DPA. The complaint was transferred to the Swedish DPA in an Article 60 GDPR procedure. The Swedish DPA held in decision DI-2021-10263 that the controller

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. 1(3) Expressen Lifestyle AB

the preliminary ruling proceedings, in return for the legal person under Swedish law HOIST FINANCE AB, with its registered office in Amsterdam, DEFENDANT

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. 1(12) Trygg-Hansa Insurance

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details.

collective agreement was concluded between the Swedish Food Workers' Union and an employers' association called The Swedish Food Federation. In point 2.2.1, subsection

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. 1(8) The Health and Medical

filed two rectification requests and an access request at Klarna Bank AB, a Swedish payment provider. Klarna had used incorrect first names in invoices for

constitutionally protected under the Swedish Freedom of Expression Act. To illustrate the issue at hand, Swedish law contained exceptions on the applicability

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. 1(11) CDON AB Södergatan 22

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. 1(15) Avanza Bank AB Regeringsgatan

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. 1(8) Lensway Group AB Diary

machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. CLAIMS, M.M. The Swedish Privacy Agency (IMY) demands

transferred the complaint to the Swedish DPA, which was the Lead Supervisory Authority (Article 56 GDPR) in this case. The Swedish DPA used the mechanisms for

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. Decision Diary No. 1 (12)

unencrypted email to the Swedish Police Authority. The researchers also claimed the second email to be an accident. After this incident the Swedish Police Authority

The decision below is a machine translation of the Swedish original. Please refer to the Swedish original for more details. The Board of Health in the

The Swedish DPA reprimanded Google LLC for refusing several requests for search results' removal under Article 17(1) and 21 GDPR. The DPA held that Google

instance administrative court partially upheld the Swedish DPA's original ruling. Contrary to the Swedish DPA’s position, the court ruled that not all letters

of the Swedish DPA (IMY) to fine a school €20,000 (SEK 200,000) for using facial recognition technology to register student attendance. The Swedish DPA carried