Search results

Wiesbaden held a data subject could not make a claim for injunctive relief for an alleged violation of his data subject rights because the GDPR does not allow

access an official computer and whether the permission of an employee is required for the Head of Service to use any of the computers belonging to an agency

Authority in password-protected ZIP format with an online download option via a channel protected by an https SSL 3.1 certificate. 3. During the analysis

The Slovenian Supervisory Authority (IP) issued an opinion as foreseen under Article 58(3) GDPR on the issue of the validity of consent to access digital

Helenic DPA (HDPA) caused by an external cyber attack. The starting point of the breach was a server of the OTE group, which has an annual turnover of €3,258

denounced that the respondent had installed a video surveillance system with an alleged focus on the complainant's house, infringing article 5(3) GDPR which

the amount of HRK 9,375.00. The data subject filed an appeal against the first instance verdict due to an incorrectly established factual situation, incorrect

The Spanish DPA issued a warning to an events organiser whose website did not provide clear information on cookies nor allowed users to reject cookies

video surveillance system, which is for security reasons. -It does not provide an impression of what in your case is captured with the camera(s) installed on

address of theclaimant was already on an internal list of persons who were notthey send communications, but due to an error they sent you a communication

with administrative fines of up to EUR 10 000 000 or in the case of an enterprise, an amount equivalent to a maximum of 2 % of total annual turnover for

debit or credit card and the abolition of cash payments on the bus and to take an enforcement action against this measure under the GDPR. The DPA rejected the

September 9, September 2020, an access to an available network drive is also detected in the equipment, locating information of an apparently sensitive nature

Articles 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(f) GDPR. The AEPD examined a complaint submitted by an anonymous citizen against the Regional Government of Andalucía (Department

tested for inconveniences. As a result of an error in the setup of a particular data filter in FLIS, there had been an unlawful disclosure of information, which

Summary In 2019, the Danish Data Protectioncarried out a planned audit at an office community of law firms. The audit focused on processing security, including

granularity"). Finally, the Datatilsynet reiterated that "consent must be an expression of an unequivocal expression of will on the part of the data subject." As

the case. After an unsuccessful appeal to the Higher Regional Court Vienna (Oberlandesgericht Wien - OLG Wien), the claimant flied an appeal with the Austrian

of this process, on April 8, 2020, the claimed states: That they have sent an email in response to the claim of the claimant. They attach a copy of the

designation of an obligation to cease and desist can - also taking into account the principles of effectiveness and equivalence - only include an obligation