Search results

the case. After an unsuccessful appeal to the Higher Regional Court Vienna (Oberlandesgericht Wien - OLG Wien), the claimant flied an appeal with the Austrian

of this process, on April 8, 2020, the claimed states: That they have sent an email in response to the claim of the claimant. They attach a copy of the

in accordance with Articles 6 and 7 GDPR. The Spanish DPA (AEPD) launched an investigation on Orange's marketing practices after several complainants lodged

a fine for an amount of 70,000 euros (seventy thousand euros). TENTH: Once the proposed resolution was notified, the defendant requested an extension of

address of theclaimant was already on an internal list of persons who were notthey send communications, but due to an error they sent you a communication

with administrative fines of up to EUR 10 000 000 or in the case of an enterprise, an amount equivalent to a maximum of 2 % of total annual turnover for

debit or credit card and the abolition of cash payments on the bus and to take an enforcement action against this measure under the GDPR. The DPA rejected the

September 9, September 2020, an access to an available network drive is also detected in the equipment, locating information of an apparently sensitive nature

Articles 5(1)(c) and 5(1)(f) GDPR. The AEPD examined a complaint submitted by an anonymous citizen against the Regional Government of Andalucía (Department

tested for inconveniences. As a result of an error in the setup of a particular data filter in FLIS, there had been an unlawful disclosure of information, which

Summary In 2019, the Danish Data Protectioncarried out a planned audit at an office community of law firms. The audit focused on processing security, including

"), while in Article 32 par. 2 GKP is provided in the context of an assessment of an appropriate level of security h taking into account the risk arising

32 GDPR) after an employee recorded video surveillance footage with their mobile phone and shared it on social media. The controller is an supermarket chain

The Croatian DPA (AZOP) imposed a fine of approximately €120,000 against an energy company for a violation of Article 15(3) GDPR by failing to provide

and Article 13 GDPR. On 14 February 2019, the Luxembourg DPA decided to open an investigation into the companies of Group A and particularly into Company

obliged to correct an incorrect verdict and, if necessary, to make any missing determinations, it is not allowed to exchange the alleged act. An inadmissible

mother of the child, as an involved partyin the Y1 procedure, has the right to access the file.83. The Ethics Committee has issued an opinion on this matter

the amount of HRK 9,375.00. The data subject filed an appeal against the first instance verdict due to an incorrectly established factual situation, incorrect

The Spanish DPA issued a warning to an events organiser whose website did not provide clear information on cookies nor allowed users to reject cookies

video surveillance system, which is for security reasons. -It does not provide an impression of what in your case is captured with the camera(s) installed on