Search results

deliberation on Article 82 of the Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés. Could the CNIL decide a prohibition

the processing lacked a legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR and breached the principle of good faith under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR. As a result, the DPA ordered

determined in Article 6.1. GDPR. 36. To this end, the Disputes Chamber examines the extent to which the legal grounds as provided in Article 6.1. GDPR can be

three-part test (Article 6 GDPR) - i) Legitimate interest ii) Necessity and iii) Balancing tests. The Commissioner has established that there is a legitimate

connection with the violation of article/and 5.1. c); 6.1.; 13.1. (c);13.1(e) and13.2(a)AVG: r PAGE 01-00001582885-0002-0033-01- □1-� r L _JCourt of Appeal Brussels

e-mail box without a legal basis, cf. the Privacy Ordinance Article 6 No. 1 letter f, for failure to assess protests, cf. , cf. Article 13. Background to

in Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, as the company processed personal data without having any of the legal titles listed in Article 6(1) GDPR

that the infringement of Article 5.1 b) GDPR and Article 6.1 a) GDPR is proven. However, the controller expressly acknowledges a serious mistake in which

SOLUCIONES ENERGÉTICAS, S.A., with NIF A85818797, for a violation of Article 6.1 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR, a fine of 50,000 euros (fifty

accountability with the principles of Article 5(1) and par.2 in conjunction with Article 6(1) GDPR. B. imposes on NEW YORK COLLEGE S.A. the effective, proportionate

defendant wrongfully relied on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR as a legal basis and acted contrary to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. After the defendant rejected

statement of the law, Article 10 defines the Authority’s competence in compliance with Article 55 GDPR.Article 55 GDPR provides for a restriction only in

infringement of article 6.1 of the GDPR, infringement typified in article 83.5 of the aforementioned Regulation 2016/679. II breached obligation Article 6.1 of the

The Danish DPA found that Securitas A/S had a legal basis under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR for disclosing the personal data of an employee to the Police Intelligence

controllers lacked a legal basis for processing in violation of Article 6(1) GDPR and failed to inform data subjects pursuant to Article 13 GDPR. In addition

violated Article 6(1) GDPR, since the newsletter was sent without a legal basis. First, the data subject had not given consent, Article 6(1)(a). Moreover

specific categories of information in Article 8 (1) and (5) of Directive 95/46 or in Article 9 (1), Article 10 (1) and Article 10 of Regulation 2016/679, the

the necessary consent was obtained, which is not acceptable under Article 6(1)(a) GDPR. The Danish DPA assumed that Leadwise placed its own and third-party

contract lacked a legal basis under Article 6(1) GDPR. In light of this, the DPA issued a fine of €70,000 to másLUZ Energía (SIE) by virtue of Article 83(5) GDPR

paragraph 1 (a) Article 6 Regulation (EU) 2016/679, as well as legitimate interests, cf. Item 6 the same articles of law, cf. paragraph 1 (f) Article 6 Regulation