Search results

and letter f., Article 5, paragraph Article 6 (1) (a) Article 32 (1), (1), (33) 1 and 35, para. 1. Below is a more detailed review of the case and a justification

with the supervisory authority Article 32: Security of processing Article 33: Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority Article

the German original. Please refer to the German original for more details. 33 O 376/22 District Court of Cologne IN THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE Judgment In the

width="15%"><select class="newMainText" id=_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos name=_piref33_15473_33_15453_15453.etos style="width:140px;" ><option value="-1"

restrictions to this right that Articles 23 GDPR and 33 Law 4624/2019 provide. More specifically, Article 33 mentions that the right to access cannot be fulfilled

relieve the doctor of his obligation to notify a breach, as required by Article 33 GDPR? During the hearing before the CNIL, the doctor explained his position

measures in place to guarantee security of processing. Violation of Article 33(1) for failing to notify the Garante of the violation of personal data Violation

authority in accordance with Article 33(1) of Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information set out in Article 33(3) of that Regulation, and to notify

dnung, Bundesdatenschutzgesetz (DS-GVO/BDSG3), C.H. Beck, 2021, Art 15 RZ 33f, the term copy in para. 3 refers to the information to be provided pursuant

the Federal Constitutional Court has clarified that the provision of Art. 33 Para elected constituency (BVerfG, decision of September 20, 2016 - 2 BvR

particular the complainant's statement of 22 January 2019, page 2 (OZ 1 p 33). They also rely on the statement of the complainant of 22 January 2019, page

HDPA - 33/2023 Authority: HDPA (Greece) Jurisdiction: Greece Relevant Law: Article 5(1)(a) GDPR Article 5(1)(c) GDPR Article 6(1)(c) GDPR Article 17(1)

deleted when the purposes have been fulfilled (C‑553/07, EU:C:2009:293, point 33). It also held that each processing operation should be compliant with Articles

violation of Article 33 GDPR. The DPA imposed a fine of EUR 3,0000 for breach of Article 32 GDPR and a warning for breach of Article 33 GDPR. Also, the DPA

of Article 33(1) and 33(5) GDPR found by the LSA: In relation to the objection of the FR SA on the absence of an infringement of Article 33(1) GDPR, the

subject, and for failing to notify this data breach, in violation of Articles 5, 33 and 34 GDPR. A data subject filed a complaint with the Greek DPA (Hellenic

Dutch original for more details. Litigation Chamber Decision on the merits 33/2020 of 19 June 2020 File number : DOS-2019-05200 Subject : Complaint about

being informed of the data breach contrary to the requirements of Article 33 GDPR. Based on a data subject's complaint, the Romanian DPA started investigations

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) held that a rare disease foundation violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify a data breach within the prescribed 72 hours. In

in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph. 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph. 3 of the Regulation