Search results
From GDPRhub
- Meanwhile postpone the decision for 7 more URLs until the data subject presents the required additional evidence and court decisions. The data subject submitted36 KB (5,761 words) - 17:19, 22 April 2024
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9788429 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)"one-stop-shop" mechanism. The Italian DPA acknowledged the Irish DPA’s position in its decision. However, the Italian DPA held the ePrivacy Directive to57 KB (9,084 words) - 15:11, 13 July 2022
- Viennese Civil Court (LGfZRS) has denied jurisdiction. The Higher Regional Court (OLG) has overturned the judgment and held that the Civil Court has jurisdiction5 KB (429 words) - 15:45, 10 March 2022
- the decision-making process and decisions of the Litigation Chamber, as well as due to the specificity and public interest present in this decision, it19 KB (2,707 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
- EFTA Court - Joined Cases E-11/19 and E-12/19 (category EFTA Court) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)GDPR. Adpublisher challenged both decisions before the BoA and requested that both decisions be set aside. The Court decided, pursuant to Article 39 of59 KB (8,242 words) - 10:47, 17 March 2021
- of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) appealed the judgment. Both the Swedish Administrative Court of Appeal and the Court of Appeal of England and Wales8 KB (1,072 words) - 13:34, 11 August 2022
- processing could be relied on. The DPA also referred to a Spanish Supreme Court, second chamber, case STS 363/2017 of 15 February 2017, where it was noted28 KB (4,608 words) - 13:27, 13 December 2023
- ve appeal before the Contentious-administrative Chamber of the National Court, in accordance with the provisions of article 25 and section 5 of the fourth20 KB (3,052 words) - 08:17, 16 April 2024
- million people was exposed online. Following a routine sweep of Irish IP addresses, the Irish National Cyber Security Centre (CSIRT-IE) discovered the exposed50 KB (8,081 words) - 18:52, 5 March 2022
- OGH - 6Ob56/21k (request for preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)6Ob56 / 21k head The Supreme Court, as a court of appeal by the Senate President Hon.-Prof. Dr. Gitschthaler as chairman, the court councilors Univ.-Prof. Dr122 KB (20,253 words) - 08:17, 19 August 2021
- respond to DSARs, the court has the discretion whether or not to issue an order to make Lloyds comply and confirmed that the court would not have exercised3 KB (372 words) - 11:58, 29 November 2021
- Finland, Slovakia and Slovenia. This decision may be appealed against to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court within one month from the date of its37 KB (4,319 words) - 09:20, 17 November 2023
- national courts and the Court of Justice only the national court has the authority to interpret and apply the national legal provisions, while the Court of Justice49 KB (7,800 words) - 09:22, 5 January 2024
- has found no basis to postpone the case pending the European Court of Justice's decisions in the aforementioned cases. The Privacy Board had the following91 KB (14,440 words) - 10:06, 17 November 2023
- In the first decision by a German higher court on these facts, the Higher Regional Court of Hamm held that loss of control over personal data is not sufficient130 KB (21,874 words) - 09:43, 15 February 2024
- administrative and case law of the Court of Appeal of Brussels, section Court of Markets”. 27. The case law of the Markets Court to which reference is made requires207 KB (31,357 words) - 14:21, 8 June 2022
- importance of transparency in the decision-making process and the decisions of the Litigation Chamber, this decision will be published on the website of45 KB (6,780 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
- to the Constitutional Court." 4. The application of the Federal Administrative Court in the case before the Constitutional Court 14 hof corresponds to202 KB (29,013 words) - 13:35, 12 January 2023
- Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 of 12 July 2016 on the adequacy of the protection conferred by the EU US Privacy Shield. In this ruling, the Court considered83 KB (12,999 words) - 15:30, 6 March 2024
- Inspectorate's decision is reversed so that Sbanken is not ordered to change the spelling of A's name in its processing systems. The decision is unanimous26 KB (4,150 words) - 16:14, 6 December 2023