Search results

also appears, such as his name and address. work email. The complainant sent an email on January 22, 2021 to members of the staff meeting in which he requested

the controller was informed of the complaint - the controller did not have an appropriate legal basis for the direct marketing and legitimate interests

claimed party is considered responsible for an infringementtypified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD , in an initial assessment, they are considered concurrentthe

defendant was not at fault with regard to an alleged breach of the GDPR. Finally, there is no causality of an alleged breach of the GDPR for the alleged

out in the public interest under Article 6(1)(e) GDPR does not constitute an appropriate and adequate legal basis for all the personal data processed.

of some employees of an external commercial partner (the company Penta Finanziamenti Italia Srl, hereinafter "Penta") through an application called Speedy

have been accredited the following: PROVEN FACTS FIRST: The 08/07/2020 has an entry in the AEPD police report bulletin FORAL DE NAVARRA (hereinafter, the

for the infringement of Article 6(1) of the GDPR, as the defendant agreed to an early voluntary payment of the corresponding part (48,000 €) of the fine suggested

impose on the claimed person as responsible for an offense typified in the Article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, in an initial assessment, they are considered concurrent

without obtaining consent or a contract for doing so. The complainant filed an action against Alterna Operador Integral SL (Flip Energy). The complainant

failed to pay the invoices issued on June 16, 2016, for an amount of 32.74 euros and July 19, 2016, for an amount of 20.32 euros, reason for which the claimant

mother of the child, as an involved partyin the Y1 procedure, has the right to access the file.83. The Ethics Committee has issued an opinion on this matter

"), while in Article 32 par. 2 GKP is provided in the context of an assessment of an appropriate level of security h taking into account the risk arising

sedeagpd.gob.es, 7/11 A65067332, as responsible for an offense classified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, in an initial assessment, they are considered concurrent

competent to resolve this process. II The defendant is charged with committing an offense for violation of article 13 of the RGPD, regarding the information

had to assess whether the culpability constitutes a requirement for imposing an administrative sanction under the GDPR. The AEPD ruled that by sending the

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (as regards (hereinafter GPRD), an offense under Article 83(5)(a) of the GPRD and described as very serious in

this body may be considered as an administrative offense in accordance with the provisions of the GDPR, classified as an infraction in its article 83.5

deletion of the personal data held by the data controller in the context of an job application process. The DPA undertook a broader investigation. Could

"ASOCIACIÓN DE VIGILANTES DE SEGURIDAD DEL AEROPUERTO DE BARCELONA" with €1800 for an infringement of the principle of confidentiality in the processing of data