Search results

for the infringement of Article 6(1) of the GDPR, as the defendant agreed to an early voluntary payment of the corresponding part (48,000 €) of the fine suggested

impose on the claimed person as responsible for an offense typified in the Article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, in an initial assessment, they are considered concurrent

without obtaining consent or a contract for doing so. The complainant filed an action against Alterna Operador Integral SL (Flip Energy). The complainant

failed to pay the invoices issued on June 16, 2016, for an amount of 32.74 euros and July 19, 2016, for an amount of 20.32 euros, reason for which the claimant

The Spanish DAP ordered Google to delist an article based on the "right to be forgotten". The AEPD issued a decision related to the right to be forgotten

fined electronics and appliance company EUR 3,000 because it kept contacting an individual for commercial purposes, although the individual had objected to

of €3000 on GTL for a breach of art. 12 and 15 of the GDPR in relation to an access request from a former employer. In particular, the Garante specified

sedeagpd.gob.es, 7/11 A65067332, as responsible for an offense classified in article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, in an initial assessment, they are considered concurrent

competent to resolve this process. II The defendant is charged with committing an offense for violation of article 13 of the RGPD, regarding the information

had to assess whether the culpability constitutes a requirement for imposing an administrative sanction under the GDPR. The AEPD ruled that by sending the

such data and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (as regards (hereinafter GPRD), an offense under Article 83(5)(a) of the GPRD and described as very serious in

this body may be considered as an administrative offense in accordance with the provisions of the GDPR, classified as an infraction in its article 83.5

deletion of the personal data held by the data controller in the context of an job application process. The DPA undertook a broader investigation. Could

"ASOCIACIÓN DE VIGILANTES DE SEGURIDAD DEL AEROPUERTO DE BARCELONA" with €1800 for an infringement of the principle of confidentiality in the processing of data

veterinarian unlawfully. He argued that his personal data was processed for an illegitimate purpose, knowing that the controller used the complainant’s personal

to impose on the defendant as responsible for an infraction typified in article 83.5.b) of the RGPD, in an initial assessment, they are estimated to be

consent. Consequently, after considering some circumstances [(i) there is an unintended negligent conduct by the defendant, and (ii) basic personal data

Knuddels' favour: The transfer of user data to an unauthorized third party was not at Knuddels' instigation but by an external hacker attack. As a result of this

the laptop and external hard drives and in the form of paper documents in an appropriate manner, and whether the data controller's procedure was in accordance

Data Protection Authority informed Varde Municipality that an employee who has been assigned an internal responsibility for the processing of personal data