Search results

.....................................4 1.3.1 Who has implemented the Tool and for what purpose, etc. ........4 1.3.2 Recipient of the data ..........

defendant by the Inspector General are signed by the group [...]. 5. The hearing of July 13, 2020 29. From the hearing of July 13, 2020 - of which a record

implementing Law No. 78-17 of 6 January 1978 on Data Processing, Data Files and Individual Liberties; Having regard to Deliberation No. 2013-175 of 4 July 2013

relevant to assess an indivuidual's creditworthiness. Neither EU law nor the national Austrian law contain provisions on the allowed storage period of creditworthiness

article 4 of Organic Law no. 4/2017, of 25 August unconstitutional, with general mandatory force , for violation of the provisions of article 34, no. 4, of

character subsidiary, by the general rules on administrative procedures." II The physical image of a person, according to article 4.1 of the GDPR, is data personnel

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two months

the inspected with section 4 of chapter 4 of the GDPR. 3. […] the inspectorate [is active in the field of transport] […]. 4. The controlled has approximately

sanctions, including administrative fines, must be subject to sufficient procedural guarantees in accordance with the general principles of the Law of the Union

was transposed into national law at the article 82 of the law "Informatique et Libertés", within chapter IV of the law relating to the Rights and obligations

equipment, has been transposed into national law in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act, within Chapter IV of the Act relating to the Rights and Obligations

that in national law nor the law of 3 December 2017 establishing the Data Protection Authority (see its in particular Article 4), nor the Law of 30 July 2018

standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §4 GDPR Art15 saying W176 2244407-1/18E In the name of the republic! The Federal Administrative Court, through the judge

section 5 of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of July 13, regulating the Contentious-administrative jurisdiction, within a period of two months

clause 4.4 of the data protection information. There is no express provision regarding the relationship between data protection law and the law on general

infractions typified in article 83.4 of the RGPD that under the rubric "General conditions for the imposition of administrative fines” provides: Violations of

of the fourth additional provision of Law 29/1998, of 07/13, regulatory authority of the Contentious-Administrative Jurisdiction, within a period of two

regulations for administrative sanctioning procedures in art. 53.2.b) of Law 39/15 where among the rights of the interested party in the administrative procedure

which puts an end to the administrative procedure as prescribed by the art. 114.1.c) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of the

proportionality, or general principles of the Community law, such as the principles of equity and respect for the law and the law, many of his reflections