Search results

the Federal Constitutional Court has clarified that the provision of Art. 33 Para elected constituency (BVerfG, decision of September 20, 2016 - 2 BvR

violation of Article 33 GDPR. The DPA imposed a fine of EUR 3,0000 for breach of Article 32 GDPR and a warning for breach of Article 33 GDPR. Also, the DPA

subject, and for failing to notify this data breach, in violation of Articles 5, 33 and 34 GDPR. A data subject filed a complaint with the Greek DPA (Hellenic

being informed of the data breach contrary to the requirements of Article 33 GDPR. Based on a data subject's complaint, the Romanian DPA started investigations

of Article 33(1) and 33(5) GDPR found by the LSA: In relation to the objection of the FR SA on the absence of an infringement of Article 33(1) GDPR, the

Dutch original for more details. Litigation Chamber Decision on the merits 33/2020 of 19 June 2020 File number : DOS-2019-05200 Subject : Complaint about

found the violation of the provisions of art. 32 para. (1) and (2) and art. 33 para. (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation. The operator DADA CREATION

security breach in its voicemail box function. Had Telenor Norge violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify the Datatilsynet of the data breach? Had Telenor

DPA fined a magazine company €31,200 for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32, and 33 GDPR because of a personal data security breach caused by vulnerabilities

been notified with regards to the security incident, in breach of Article 33 GDPR, for which the controller was fined RON 4,918.3 (approximately €1,000)

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) held that a rare disease foundation violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify a data breach within the prescribed 72 hours. In

(controller) notified the Romanian DPA of two data breaches in line with Article 33 GDPR. Following the notifications, the DPA launched an investigation which

didn't consider the incident to have triggered this requirement as per Article 33 GDPR. * Innovation Norway is state-owned and the Norwegian government's instrument

in accordance with Art. 33 paragraph. 1 of the Regulation 2016/679, which must contain the information specified in art. 33 paragraph. 3 of the Regulation

Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Article 34 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No further action Started:

limit mandated by Article 33(1). Did the secretariat of the DPA breach its data security obligations under Articles 32(1), 33(1), and 34(1)? The Datatilsynet

breach to the supervisory authority, in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Under Article 33, the controller should have reported the breach within 72 hours

The AEPD approved a transport hub's compliance with Articles 32 and 33 GDPR after having used its investigation powers. After a security guard of Madrid’s

The Datatilsynet issued a decision on Articles 32 and 33 GDPR due to unencrypted e-mails sent by the controller. After carrying out investigations at its

the under General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. According to Article 33 of GDPR, in the case of a personal data breach, the Data Controller shall