Search results

Articles 12 and 15 GDPR regarding the right to access personal data, while it also underlined the restrictions to this right that Articles 23 GDPR and 33 Law 4624/2019

complaint in accordance with Article 78, second paragraph, of the GDPR and recital 141 of the GDPR. Has the defendant observed the reasonable period in handling

to access under Article 15 GDPR because the controller was entitled to reject the request pursuant to Article 12(5)(b) GDPR. The court reasoned that this

an access request under Article 15(1) GDPR. According to Recital 63 GDPR, the right of access under Article 15 GDPR serves data subjects to be informed about

justification or basis for the processing, violating Article 9 GDPR. AEPD highlighted that Recital 46 GDPR already recognizes that, in exceptional situations, such

situation is warranted. In this respect, Recital 137 GDPR states 65 66See Article 77 GDPR. See Recital 137 GDPR. 28that an urgent need to act in order to

regard on that article 2.1) GDPR read in conjunction with recital 15 of the GDPR, although an exclusion from the scope of the GDPR provides for files or a

e) of the GDPR). 8.1.4. As for breaches of Articles 5.2. and 24 of the GDPR 88. Article 24.1 of the GDPR which covers Chapter IV of the GDPR devoted to

according to Art 15 Paragraph 1 GDPR, such as the origin of the data. In accordance with Art 15 (4) GDPR and Recital 63 GDPR, the information must be restricted

AB for violating Article 17 GDPR by not deleting personal data of the complainant without undue delay and Article 23 GDPR by providing incorrect information

of the GDPR according to Art. 99 Para. 2 GDPR as of May 25, 2018 follows from Art. 79 Para. 2 Sentence 1 GDPR in conjunction with recital 22 GDPR as well

causality between the "GDPR breach" and the "damage". Article 82(1) GDPR requires that the damage occurs as a result of a specific GDPR breach. Although it

norm addressee of Chapter V GDPR. The bB be directly responsible for BF2, which violated Art. 44 ff GDPR. Regarding The GDPR is applicable to the processing

Article 32 GDPR. Retaining personal data of an applicant for a lease after another applicant has been selected also violates Article 5(1)(e) GDPR. The customer

understood as made to the GDPR, in accordance with article 94 of the last. Likewise, it is apparent from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly

the sanctioning regime imposed by the GDPR. And this is because the GDPR is a closed and complete system. The GDPR is a European standard directly applicable

the meaning of Art. 15 (1) (2) (b) GDPR in conjunction with Art 4 No. 1 GDPR. According to recital 63 p. 7 to the GDPR, the party entitled to information

transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding GDPR recitals (32, 39, 42, 47, 58, 60, 61, and 72), as well are Articles

4 no. 1 GDPR cf. Arning/Rothkegel in Taeger/Gabel, GDPR/BDSG, 3rd ed. 2019, Art. 4 GDPR para. 8 ff. mwN; Klar/Kühling in Kühling/Buchner, GDPR/BDSG, 3rd

plaintiff pursuant to Article 82(1) GDPR, since there have been violations of Article 6(1)(a) GDPR and Article 34 GDPR. The defendant also breached the obligation