Search results

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

procedure to the claimed, withpursuant to the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged infringementof Article 58.1 of the RGPD, typified

and the lack of cooperation with the Spanish Data Protection Agency (83 (2) (f) GDPR). Therefore, in view of the aggravating factors applied to the case,

Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established in article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure ofthe Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

established by Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? Was there a personal data breach? The AEPD considered that there was an infringement of Article 5(1)(f), as there was a leak

accordance with Articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on Procedure Common Administration of Public Administration (LPACAP), as it does not allegations

the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeaepd.gob.es 4/20 LPACAP, for the alleged violation of Article

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

provisions of article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, which in its Section f) establishes that

and 64 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October 2015 on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter referred to as the LPACAP), on

out in Article 64.2(f) of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administration (hereinafter LPACAP). In accordance

of Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1/10, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged violation

in Article 64 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Procedure Common Administrative Framework for Public Administrations, which in paragraph (f) provides that

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance