Search results

personal data under Article 9(1) GDPR. Their processing would require the data subjects' explicit consent under Article 9(2)(a) GDPR and § 151(4) GewO, ordered

interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. On the erasure obligations under Article 17 GDPR, the CJEU held that under Article 17(1)(d) GDPR SCHUFA will be under

administrative fine for the infringement of Article 6(1) or Article 6(1)(b) GDPR meet the requirements of Article 4(24) GDPR. 504. The EDPB decides that the relevant

of personal data of data subjects guaranteed by Article 44 GDPR and consequently breached Article 44 GDPR. The DPA issued a fine of 300,000 SEK (approx.

............. ......................4 1.3.1 Who has implemented the Tool and for what purpose, etc. ........4 1.3.2 Recipient of the data ............

...............3 1.3 What Coop has stated............................................... ........................................4 1.3.1 Who has implemented

within the meaning of Article 4 no. 2 of the GDPR and the term "transfer" within the meaning of Article 44 et seq. of the GDPR. GDPR had to be differentiated

the documents or files containing their personal data under Article 15(3) GDPR and Article 12 of the ePrivacy Directive. However, there is a right to a

age of consent in Sweden is 13 years following § 4 of the Data Protection Act. Under Chapter 3 § 3 number 3 there is a general provision opening up for processing

26/2021 - 4/4 This interim decision can be appealed within 30 days of its notification registered with the Marktenhof (article 108, § 1, of the law of 3 December

violation of Article 6(1) GDPR; 2. Did not provide the complainant with enough information prior to the processing, in violation of Article 13 GDPR; 3. Processed

protection within the meaning of Article 45 of the GDPR and without appropriate safeguards within the meaning of Article 46 of the GDPR. Furthermore, the plaintiff

categories of personal data, cf. GDPR article 9 no. 1, cf. article 4 no. 15. The medical list disputes this. Article 4 (15) reads as follows: "For the purposes

Therefore, given that Article 6(1), Article 5(1)(a), Article 5(1)(d), Article 5(1)(c), and Article 14 GDPR were infringed in connection to Article 5(1)(b), the

Infringement of Article 6 and 9 GDPR qualifies for the maximum amount for administrative fines as set out in Article 83(5) GDPR: 20,000,000 € or 4% of the total

defendant within the meaning of Article 4 of the GDPR. The defendant is therefore a controller within the meaning of Art. 4 No. 7 GDPR. b. 44 The Senate is convinced

reading first sentence of Article 15(3), in conjunction with Article 12(5) of the GDPR under Article 23(1)(i) GDPR. (judgment of 4 May 2023, Österreichische

various GDPR violations (including the principles of legality, transparency and fairness, minimisation and security among others). In total, 4 complaints

under Article 32 GDPR? 4) Does Article 82(3) GDPR allow the controller to be exempt from liability for damages if the data breach as defined by 4(12) GDPR

Protection Act 2019 sets exceptions in Article 9(1) GDPR, Article 15 GDPR, Article 16 GDPR, Article 18 GDPR and Article 21 GDPR for scientific or historical research