Search results

From GDPRhub
  • for this, Plesner has referred to the English Data Protection Authority (ICO), which writes the following on its website about the concept of "legal claim":
    43 KB (6,531 words) - 14:04, 21 September 2022
  • Member States of the European Union have also expressed their opinion (see ICO, Direct marketing guidance, version 1.124 October 2013; CNIL, Délibération
    144 KB (23,155 words) - 15:46, 6 December 2023
  • (f), according to the ICO [12] also applies to potential but not yet updated legal claims, as the following appears from the ICO's guidelines on the processing
    105 KB (17,427 words) - 18:19, 16 February 2022
  • discussion on the practical implications of Brexit for EDPB members and the ICO’s involvement with the EDPB post-Brexit. The Chair declared that the EDPB
    15 KB (2,014 words) - 19:45, 6 June 2020
  • issues seemed to need "further and definitive consideration in this case", the ICO should be invited to consider intervening to assist it. This is the first
    122 KB (20,830 words) - 10:42, 12 January 2022
  • the AEPD of reference number 36/2020. - Reference number 11: opinion of the ICO (Information Commissioner's Office) entitled “The use of live facial recognition
    337 KB (50,591 words) - 15:29, 5 August 2021
  • generic abbreviation “N / A”. The reference to the UK Control Authority (ICO) as the authority to consult in case of identification of high residual risks
    180 KB (29,599 words) - 13:51, 28 July 2021
View ( | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)