Search results

Jagielska, J. Jagielski, R. Stankiewicz, M. Grzywacz, art. 149, in: Law on proceedings before administrative courts. Commentary, ed. R. Hauser, M. Wierzbowski

down the more or else requested. This decision was made by Mrs. N.W.M. van den Heuvel, R.R.M. the Moor and T. van der Valk and was pronounced in public on

where appropriate, of the personal data. - With reference to its Resolution R/00818/2012, the capture of images of public spaces by private surveillance

Provincial Administrative Court in Rzeszów (Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Rzeszowie - WSA Rzeszów). The WSA Rzeszów overturned the decision from the

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 1 6 6 - 1/4 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Regional Court) as the court of appeal of 24 April 2020, GZ 14 R 159. April 2020, GZ 14 R 159/19h-13, whereby the judgment of the Regional Court for Civil

Procedure. The Kp. Pursuant to Article 12 (2) (a) of the Administrative P r o c e d u r e Act, an administrative action against a decision of the Authority is

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

at Decision date July 10, 2023 business number W256 2234976-1/19E W256 2234976-2/19E I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Federal Administrative Court

original for more details. Ro 2020/04/0031-9 February 1, 2024 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President

during the control activity: see previous point 1.1., spec. letter m., r., t ., w.), preordained to assign a score to the rider for the declared purpose

without, however, sharing the PIN and PUK codes ”(see cit. note, p. 24, 25); r. “Company telephone and SIM therefore remained available to the Complainant

Duschel, Mag. Klaus Hanten, lawyers in Vienna, against the defendant City of W*****, represented by Dr. Andreas Joklik, lawyer in Vienna. Andreas Joklik,

Spanish original for more details. 1/4  File No.: EXP202203923 RESOLUTION Nº: R/00738/2022 Having regard to the claim made on March 7, 2022 before this Agency

He also referred to an article he wrote about the GDPR in the magazine "f & w lead and manage in the hospital", issue 02/17. The penultimate sentence of

of the original. Please refer to the Bulgarian original for more details. R E W E N I E No. 8 Sofia, 15 November 20 1 9 (Promulgated SG No. 99 of November

is mandatory if the conditions are met (see VG Würzburg, B.v. 28.1.2020 - W 8 E 19.1669 - juris marginal no. 48; Rathke in Zipfel/Rathke, Lebensmittelrecht

M. Georgieva and T. Mitova, acting as Agents, – the French Government, by R. Bénard, A.-L. Desjonquères, D. Dubois and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents, –

has a right to refuse to give evidence or testify (see BayVGH, loc.cit. m.w.N.). The order pursuant to § 31a para. 1 sentence 1 StVZO does not presuppose

[Name of company], at [place], plaintiff, authorized representative: mr. H.W.J. melting head, and the State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate (Telecom