Search results

the Article 12 of the GDPR, in conjunction with Article 17 of the GDPR. V Classification of the infringement of article 12 of the GDPR The aforementioned

in Article 25 GDPR. Additionally, the AEPD concluded that the controller had violated Article 5(1)(f) GDPR, noting that although the GDPR does not demand

established in article 5 of the GDPR. The security of personal data is regulated in articles 32, 33 and 34 of the GDPR. III The GDPR defines personal data security

excessive for the intended purpose of processing as per Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Recital 39 GDPR. The AEPD issued a reprimand on the controller. Share your comments

Regarding the substitution of the fine with a reprimand, the DPA alluded to Recital 148 GDPR which stated that the applicable sanctions for the violation of the

performance of a contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) and for legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Article 6(1)(b) GDPR In its original draft decision, the

Article 81 of the GDPR, but not the actually relevant Article 82 of the GDPR. The claims asserted in the counterclaim under Article 82 of the GDPR were confirmed

Therefore, the AEPD fined the controller €2000 for a violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. In order to determine the amount of the fine, the DPA took into account

(Article 5(2) GDPR), of engagement of a processor (Article 28 GDPR), and in respect of the security of processing of personal data (Article 32 GDPR). However

according to Article 6(1)(c) GDPR would be a valid legal basis, related to the exception provided by Article 9(2)(h) GDPR: the employer has the obligation

of the GDPR – (article 13.1. c) of the GDPR) and does not mention the data retention periods personal data processed (article 13.2. a) of the GDPR more precisely);

Adopted 13 GDPR for processing on foot of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR . The IE recalls the general requirement of transparencyunder Article5(a)GDPR 54,anditsp

the processing (Article 21(1) GDPR). Finally, the DPA fined the controller €12,000 for a violation of Article 6(1) GDPR due to the lack of a valid legal

subject. For violating Article 6 GDPR, the DPA fined the controller €4,000 and ordered, in accordance with Article 58(2) GDPR, the removal of the device in

process. It considers that the process of adaptation to the GDPR. . In accordance with Recital 82 of the RGPD, the registration of activities of Treatment

system. When the workers asked about the information listed under Article 13 GDPR, they only received a generic answer saying that the personal data were being

c) GDPR in conjunction with Article 5.1 a) GDPR and Article 5.2 GDPR. - Violation of article 13.1 d) GDPR in conjunction with article 5.1 a) GDPR and

with the requirements of Articles 13 and 14 of the GDPR? In relation to Article 13 and 14 of the GDPR, the AEPD held that the information CaixaBank provided

5(1)(f) GDPR and a fine of €100,000 for the violation of Article 37 GDPR. The DPA issued a reprimand for the violations of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article

point b) GDPR and Article 100, §1, 5 ° WOG to be reprimanded for the infringement of Article 25 (1) GDPR; b. on the basis of Article 83 GDPR and Articles